Local forcasters calling for moderate risk tomorrow 4/24....
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
jkt21787 wrote:OUN, unlike most other offices, won't usually issue a tornado warning for wall clouds or funnel clouds or weak-moderate rotation, unless there is something quite imminent with it. They usually wait until its about on the ground.
That's dangerous, especially at night. If it touches down in a developed area suddenly, it could be deadly...
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
CrazyC83 wrote:jkt21787 wrote:OUN, unlike most other offices, won't usually issue a tornado warning for wall clouds or funnel clouds or weak-moderate rotation, unless there is something quite imminent with it. They usually wait until its about on the ground.
That's dangerous, especially at night. If it touches down in a developed area suddenly, it could be deadly...
The big reason for that is the cutting edge technology and the number of chasers out of the OKC/Norman area. They have technology 5 years before anyone else does. They have more storm chasers/spotters in OKC area than any other. Probably more than the next closest 3 combined. The news channels in okc alone have more than a half dozen chasers each each station also has at least one helicopter and I think channel 9 and channel 4 have 2 helicpoters.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm
soonertwister wrote:Something totally impressive about this El Reno tornado tonight is that it was anticyclonic, which is extremely rare. Even more rare was that it was an intense anticyclone, which to me looked likely to be an F4.
First strong anticyclone I've ever seen on video.
F4?! You are kidding, right?
The storm barely did any damage to the airport. F1 probably, maybe low end F2, though that's highly up for debate depending on the airport hangar's structural integrity. Tornado never got wider than a few dozen yards either.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm
We are obviously talking about two different tornadoes. The one I saw was a LOT bigger than a few dozen yards, and was definitely rotating faster than an F2.
Whether or not it's the one that hit the airport, I couldn't tell you. I was listening to internet audio when I watched the view on TV.
Whether or not it's the one that hit the airport, I couldn't tell you. I was listening to internet audio when I watched the view on TV.
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
soonertwister wrote:We are obviously talking about two different tornadoes. The one I saw was a LOT bigger than a few dozen yards, and was definitely rotating faster than an F2.
Whether or not it's the one that hit the airport, I couldn't tell you. I was listening to internet audio when I watched the view on TV.
Ummm no, there were two tornadoes in elreno area today. One was itty bitty maybe not even on the ground and the other was an F1...F2 at best...There wasn't an F4 in the state tonight, hell even the strong one down by the red river will probably turn out to be a strong F2 weak F3 and that was late this evening. The one in el reno was weak relatively speaking.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
jkt21787 wrote:soonertwister wrote:Something totally impressive about this El Reno tornado tonight is that it was anticyclonic, which is extremely rare. Even more rare was that it was an intense anticyclone, which to me looked likely to be an F4.
First strong anticyclone I've ever seen on video.
F4?! You are kidding, right?
The storm barely did any damage to the airport. F1 probably, maybe low end F2, though that's highly up for debate depending on the airport hangar's structural integrity. Tornado never got wider than a few dozen yards either.
I'd say it was an F1 or maybe even an F0 - they are not very strong structures.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 630
- Age: 38
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:02 pm
- Location: Westport, CT
- Contact:
The first El Reno tornado was by far the bigger one, and though I was not close enough to see the ground-level circulation, I'm pretty sure it didn't hit anything but some trees. The second El Reno tornado, which was a classic anticyclonic trucated cone, has officially been rated an F1 from the roof damage it did to the El Reno Airport. We witnessed what appeared to be a third tornado as the supercell cycled back up about ten minutes later but it may have just been a funnel cloud -- we're reviewing the video.
0 likes
Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests