7 years ago today

U.S. & Caribbean Weather Discussions and Severe Weather Events

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Jim Cantore

7 years ago today

#1 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed May 03, 2006 7:36 pm

I cant believe nobody has mentioned this


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#2 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed May 03, 2006 7:47 pm

That was a very sad day.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#3 Postby Jim Cantore » Wed May 03, 2006 8:16 pm

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#4 Postby MGC » Wed May 03, 2006 9:29 pm

I was up in the OKC area about a month after the May 3rd F5 tornado. Naturally, I had to go see the damage. Incredible to say the least. Thought I'd never see anything like that again until Katrina. I was watching TWC this morning and they said that there has not been another F5 since the May 99 OKC F5....MGC
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#5 Postby HurricaneBill » Wed May 03, 2006 10:39 pm

Is this the longest we've gone without an F5? 7 years?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#6 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed May 03, 2006 10:50 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:Is this the longest we've gone without an F5? 7 years?


Yep. F4's are becoming less common also. The introduction of the EF Scale promises to continue to decrease the number of violent tornadoes, as another poster mentioned in another forum.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#7 Postby HurricaneBill » Thu May 04, 2006 1:06 am

wxmann_91 wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:Is this the longest we've gone without an F5? 7 years?


Yep. F4's are becoming less common also.


Why is that? Are they getting stricter with the scale?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#8 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu May 04, 2006 1:12 am

HurricaneBill wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:Is this the longest we've gone without an F5? 7 years?


Yep. F4's are becoming less common also.


Why is that? Are they getting stricter with the scale?


Yeah, pretty much. If there are many houses nearby, or the structure is not constructed "to the standard" (which, unfortunately, many aren't), the tornado automatically cannot get an F5 rating.

However, I believe in the end they will cancel each other now, cause now you can get an F5 if the ground is scoured away completely (they couldn't before). The info in the first paragraph is purely from EF developers and researchers, so I'm probably wrong.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#9 Postby HurricaneBill » Thu May 04, 2006 2:13 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:
Why is that? Are they getting stricter with the scale?


Yeah, pretty much. If there are many houses nearby, or the structure is not constructed "to the standard" (which, unfortunately, many aren't), the tornado automatically cannot get an F5 rating.

However, I believe in the end they will cancel each other now, cause now you can get an F5 if the ground is scoured away completely (they couldn't before). The info in the first paragraph is purely from EF developers and researchers, so I'm probably wrong.


Oh, OK. I figured Derek Ortt had gotten to them. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#10 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu May 04, 2006 5:35 pm

lol Bill

Another major svr event started 3 years ago today - The Great May Outbreak of 2003.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#11 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu May 04, 2006 5:55 pm

I remember that...that was incredable...I couldve sworn there was an F5 with that event...
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#12 Postby MiamiensisWx » Thu May 04, 2006 5:57 pm

I remember this from 1999, too. I was watching footage and images of it on TV as it unfolded and after it occurred. VERY impressive system for sure, and a very sad aftermath!
Last edited by MiamiensisWx on Thu May 04, 2006 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
WaitingForSiren
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
Contact:

#13 Postby WaitingForSiren » Thu May 04, 2006 5:57 pm

While a very active period with numerous reports of tornadoes, the may outbreak of 2003 failed to live up to the expectations half the time. May 4 2003 lived up to the expectations, and may 6 was a over-producer, but may 8 and 10 didnt really produce what was forecast. Like i said there were numerous reports may 8 and 10, bt the tornadoes were weak (especially may 10) or short lived.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#14 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu May 04, 2006 6:01 pm

WaitingForSiren wrote:While a very active period with numerous reports of tornadoes, the may outbreak of 2003 failed to live up to the expectations half the time. May 4 2003 lived up to the expectations, and may 6 was a over-producer, but may 8 and 10 didnt really produce what was forecast. Like i said there were numerous reports may 8 and 10, bt the tornadoes were weak (especially may 10) or short lived.


True. May 10-11 should've been a massive outbreak.
0 likes   

User avatar
WaitingForSiren
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
Contact:

#15 Postby WaitingForSiren » Thu May 04, 2006 6:14 pm

Do you have any idea why all the tornadoes may 10 were weak? When i watch radar animations all of the supercells appear to be rather weak...like there just wasnt enough instability or something. Im thinking maybe the atmosphere was a little TOO moist, with dewpoints way into the 70s. seems like most major outbreaks have low 60s dews.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#16 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu May 04, 2006 6:27 pm

WaitingForSiren wrote:Do you have any idea why all the tornadoes may 10 were weak? When i watch radar animations all of the supercells appear to be rather weak...like there just wasnt enough instability or something. Im thinking maybe the atmosphere was a little TOO moist, with dewpoints way into the 70s. seems like most major outbreaks have low 60s dews.


I recall there was an AMS paper on the reasons that outbreak failed, but I can't find it anymore.

I really think it's the quality vs. the quantity of the moisture. I wasn't watching the radars that day, or tracking the event, so I have no idea what doomed it.
0 likes   


Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests