brunota2003 wrote:The mountains very well may have helped. There is most likely some truth to the myth that towns are "protected" if they have a mountain right next door. It would be harder for the strongest winds to reach the surface, because the mountains would disrupt the lower portion of the circulation (friction can be a life saver). Now think about it, if it hadn't of been in a mountainous area, and instead flat land like the Midwest, what would the winds of been like at the surface?
Hard to say, but on 4/27, there was a solid EF4 tornado in the middle of the Smoky Mountains. Fortunately, it was in a remote area, but it did tear huge towers and trees to pieces. Not sure if I agree with that theory. But then again, 4/27 had a more dynamic system, so that could have been a 5 instead of a 4 in flat land in that case.
If that was the case, it made the difference between severe damage and total destruction.