MAN SOMEONE ANSWER NEGATIVE OR POSITIVE NAO?................
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
MAN SOMEONE ANSWER NEGATIVE OR POSITIVE NAO?................
What do u all think. Will we have a strong negative nao or positive nao this winter. There reports of both but mostly negative nao. Though its impossible to predict nao this far out for the winter. I hope Chicago or anywhere in the Midwest have a winter like last year where we recieved like no snow. So what do u all think. Will we have a strong negative nao this winter or positive. I can only for a negative. But will probably end up positive most of winter like it always usually is.
0 likes
-
- S2K Analyst
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Re: MAN SOMEONE ANSWER NEGATIVE OR POSITIVE NAO?............
MidwestWeather,
Some winters see the NAO primarily negative; others see it primarily positive. While there appear to be cycles where strings of winters see a predominant sign, this is not a new phenomenon. Reconstructed NAO indices that go back as far as 1500 show this tendency.
Finally, neither major snowstorms nor exceptionally snowy months require either a negative or positive NAO. They have occurred with both signs. Intellicast's Joe D'Aleo has written on this with regard to blockbuster East Coast snowstorms.
At some point in the future--unless, of course I forget
--I'll touch on this with regard to snowy months.
With regard to Chicago, January 1918 saw 42.5" of snow with a negative NAO for the month; February 1896 received 27.8" with a positive NAO; and March 1926 witnessed 23.1" with a neutral to slightly positive NAO.
Some winters see the NAO primarily negative; others see it primarily positive. While there appear to be cycles where strings of winters see a predominant sign, this is not a new phenomenon. Reconstructed NAO indices that go back as far as 1500 show this tendency.
Finally, neither major snowstorms nor exceptionally snowy months require either a negative or positive NAO. They have occurred with both signs. Intellicast's Joe D'Aleo has written on this with regard to blockbuster East Coast snowstorms.
At some point in the future--unless, of course I forget

With regard to Chicago, January 1918 saw 42.5" of snow with a negative NAO for the month; February 1896 received 27.8" with a positive NAO; and March 1926 witnessed 23.1" with a neutral to slightly positive NAO.
0 likes
Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: HurricaneBelle, jaguars_22 and 24 guests