
7 years ago today
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
- MGC
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5899
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
- Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.
I was up in the OKC area about a month after the May 3rd F5 tornado. Naturally, I had to go see the damage. Incredible to say the least. Thought I'd never see anything like that again until Katrina. I was watching TWC this morning and they said that there has not been another F5 since the May 99 OKC F5....MGC
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
HurricaneBill wrote:wxmann_91 wrote:HurricaneBill wrote:Is this the longest we've gone without an F5? 7 years?
Yep. F4's are becoming less common also.
Why is that? Are they getting stricter with the scale?
Yeah, pretty much. If there are many houses nearby, or the structure is not constructed "to the standard" (which, unfortunately, many aren't), the tornado automatically cannot get an F5 rating.
However, I believe in the end they will cancel each other now, cause now you can get an F5 if the ground is scoured away completely (they couldn't before). The info in the first paragraph is purely from EF developers and researchers, so I'm probably wrong.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
wxmann_91 wrote:HurricaneBill wrote:
Why is that? Are they getting stricter with the scale?
Yeah, pretty much. If there are many houses nearby, or the structure is not constructed "to the standard" (which, unfortunately, many aren't), the tornado automatically cannot get an F5 rating.
However, I believe in the end they will cancel each other now, cause now you can get an F5 if the ground is scoured away completely (they couldn't before). The info in the first paragraph is purely from EF developers and researchers, so I'm probably wrong.
Oh, OK. I figured Derek Ortt had gotten to them.

0 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
- WaitingForSiren
- Category 1
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 pm
- Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
- Contact:
While a very active period with numerous reports of tornadoes, the may outbreak of 2003 failed to live up to the expectations half the time. May 4 2003 lived up to the expectations, and may 6 was a over-producer, but may 8 and 10 didnt really produce what was forecast. Like i said there were numerous reports may 8 and 10, bt the tornadoes were weak (especially may 10) or short lived.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
WaitingForSiren wrote:While a very active period with numerous reports of tornadoes, the may outbreak of 2003 failed to live up to the expectations half the time. May 4 2003 lived up to the expectations, and may 6 was a over-producer, but may 8 and 10 didnt really produce what was forecast. Like i said there were numerous reports may 8 and 10, bt the tornadoes were weak (especially may 10) or short lived.
True. May 10-11 should've been a massive outbreak.
0 likes
- WaitingForSiren
- Category 1
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 pm
- Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
- Contact:
Do you have any idea why all the tornadoes may 10 were weak? When i watch radar animations all of the supercells appear to be rather weak...like there just wasnt enough instability or something. Im thinking maybe the atmosphere was a little TOO moist, with dewpoints way into the 70s. seems like most major outbreaks have low 60s dews.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
WaitingForSiren wrote:Do you have any idea why all the tornadoes may 10 were weak? When i watch radar animations all of the supercells appear to be rather weak...like there just wasnt enough instability or something. Im thinking maybe the atmosphere was a little TOO moist, with dewpoints way into the 70s. seems like most major outbreaks have low 60s dews.
I recall there was an AMS paper on the reasons that outbreak failed, but I can't find it anymore.
I really think it's the quality vs. the quantity of the moisture. I wasn't watching the radars that day, or tracking the event, so I have no idea what doomed it.
0 likes
Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests