Auroral activity is currently visible from New Hampshire and could become brighter and visible from more southerly locations tonight. In addition we have another X-class flare in progress and a proton event has started.
Steve
Aurora Alert
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
Aurora Alert
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
Extremeweatherguy wrote:has the aurora ever been seen as far south as Houston, TX? If so is there any possiblity of that happening from this event? It would sure be neat to see one time.
I'm guessing it somewhat unlikely. The highest rating of geomagnetic storm (G5) takes the southern edge of the aurora to about 35 N latitude, putting it somewhere around central OK / AK. But I'd like to be wrong!
Edited: revised geography
0 likes
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
Under the most extreme circumstances, the aurora has been seen in the Tropics. One display in 1909 was seen in Singapore. The March 1989 aurbo was seen in HI. We have seen a number of bright displays down here in SE AZ and since our geomagnetic latitude (which is what determines auroral visibility) is not much different from Houston's, they have undoubtedly been in the visiblilty zone of past aurbos. The main problem has to do with light pollution because unless you are outside of the city in a dark sky location you will never see the aurora (or at least only very rarely). This particular storm is going to be marginal for southern observers though with the current ap/K values at 179/8- which we continue at that level for a while it might happen.
Steve
Steve
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 42
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Aurora Alert
Aslkahuna wrote:Auroral activity is currently visible from New Hampshire and could become brighter and visible from more southerly locations tonight. In addition we have another X-class flare in progress and a proton event has started.
Steve
This would be the fourth X-class flare from sunspot 930 (at least since it cross the eastern limb). The latest rating from SEC has minor events due to solar radiation storming (S1), but severe for geomagnetic storming (G4). A G4 event, statistically, only happens 100 times every cycle (or 11 years).
I haven't heard of too many impacts from this latest flare (which registered as X1.5), but it's still pretty early, I suppose.
0 likes
Aslkahuna wrote:Under the most extreme circumstances, the aurora has been seen in the Tropics. One display in 1909 was seen in Singapore. The March 1989 aurbo was seen in HI. We have seen a number of bright displays down here in SE AZ and since our geomagnetic latitude (which is what determines auroral visibility) is not much different from Houston's, they have undoubtedly been in the visiblilty zone of past aurbos. The main problem has to do with light pollution because unless you are outside of the city in a dark sky location you will never see the aurora (or at least only very rarely). This particular storm is going to be marginal for southern observers though with the current ap/K values at 179/8- which we continue at that level for a while it might happen.
Steve
I want to see an aurora. I heard in 1989, it could be seen far south as Central America. We have light pollution in the Houston area.

0 likes
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
I know the 1989 aurora was almost overhead from here in SE AZ so given the height the red aurora reaches in big displays (1000 km) it definitely would have been seen in Central America and Houston would have seen it as well if it were not for the city lights. That is the key because the diffuse glow of the city lights will hide all but the brightest parts of a big aurbo. BTW last nights event was indeed faintly seen in AZ according to Spaceweather.com.
Steve
Steve
0 likes
Aslkahuna wrote:I know the 1989 aurora was almost overhead from here in SE AZ so given the height the red aurora reaches in big displays (1000 km) it definitely would have been seen in Central America and Houston would have seen it as well if it were not for the city lights. That is the key because the diffuse glow of the city lights will hide all but the brightest parts of a big aurbo. BTW last nights event was indeed faintly seen in AZ according to Spaceweather.com.
Steve
Cool. I hate light pollution.

0 likes
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
Chris Schur photographed the aurbo from Payson AZ and his description jibes with what I saw down here allowing for me being further south so it was visible as far south as AZ just not very bright down here. Considering how remarkable this burst of activity has been for this phase of the cycle it's could be a while before we see another big display.
Steve
Steve
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests