Abstract Thought: Is a Typhoon Tip Possible in the Atlantic

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#61 Postby Cyclenall » Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:26 pm

If the user HalloweenGale told us that then we would understand that better. It makes more sense now but I find it hard to beileve that happened. A track of that would be great so we can see how Gay made a round.

So Gay became a Tropical Cyclone after he was an Ex-Tropical Low that caused the December 1992 Gale?
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4025
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#62 Postby AJC3 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:32 pm

Cyclenall wrote:If the user HalloweenGale told us that then we would understand that better. It makes more sense now but I find it hard to beileve that happened. A track of that would be great so we can see how Gay made a round.

So Gay became a Tropical Cyclone after he was an Ex-Tropical Low that caused the December 1992 Gale?



Nah, once it became XTROP, it stayed that way.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#63 Postby P.K. » Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:51 pm

AJC3 wrote:Its remnants then formed into a massive storm off the Aleutian Islands of Alaska. After reforming again in British Columbia and crossing California, it gave birth to another low in Texas. Then on December 11th, 1992, this storm traveled east and became a great "Noreaster" along the U.S. East Coast with 90 mile an hour wind gusts.[/i]


It then appears from the NCEP reanalysis to have formed yet another low in the North Atlantic on the 16th Dec which then went to pass to the NW of the UK at sub 965hPa on the 18th Dec. Now the Free University of Berlin who give names to all areas of high and low pressure over Europe certainly would not have referred to this as it's original TC name as it was not the original extratropical storm. I'm not sure how far you can follow it and still say its remnants of an ex tropical system really.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4025
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#64 Postby AJC3 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:17 pm

P.K. wrote:
AJC3 wrote:Its remnants then formed into a massive storm off the Aleutian Islands of Alaska. After reforming again in British Columbia and crossing California, it gave birth to another low in Texas. Then on December 11th, 1992, this storm traveled east and became a great "Noreaster" along the U.S. East Coast with 90 mile an hour wind gusts.[/i]


It then appears from the NCEP reanalysis to have formed yet another low in the North Atlantic on the 16th Dec which then went to pass to the NW of the UK at sub 965hPa on the 18th Dec. Now the Free University of Berlin who give names to all areas of high and low pressure over Europe certainly would not have referred to this as it's original TC name as it was not the original extratropical storm. I'm not sure how far you can follow it and still say its remnants of an ex tropical system really.



Conventional thinking is that you can as long as there is some temporal continuity in the SLP and/or vorticity fields.

BTW...I should have already have it bookmarked, but could provide me the link to the NCEP reanalysis site. I was looking to use it since our office archive of "Daily Weather Maps" only goes back to '94.
0 likes   

Patrick99
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: SW Broward, FL

#65 Postby Patrick99 » Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:00 am

boca_chris wrote:
CHRISTY wrote:This is from wilma....What a storm!

IN ADDITION TO THE SPECTACULAR CLOUD PATTERN OBSERVED ON SATELLITE
...AN AIR FORCE RECONNAISSANCE PLANE MEASURED 168 KNOTS AT 700 MB
AND ESTIMATED A MINIMUM PRESSURE OF 884 MB EXTRAPOLATED FROM 700MB.
UNOFFICIALLY...THE METEOROLOGIST ON BOARD THE PLANE RELAYED AN
EXTRAPOLATED 881 MB PRESSURE AND MEASURED 884 MB WITH A DROPSONDE.
THIS IS ALL IN ASSOCIATION WITH A VERY SMALL EYE THAT HAS BEEN
OSCILLATING BETWEEN 2 AND 4 N MI DURING EYE PENETRATIONS. THIS IS
PROBABLY THE LOWEST MINIMUM PRESSURE EVER OBSERVED IN THE ATLANTIC
BASIN AND IS FOLLOWED BY THE 888 MB MINIMUM PRESSURE ASSOCIATED
WITH HURRICANE GILBERT IN 1988.


Wilma certainly is the queen of all storms beating out Katrina in my opinion....Florida is lucky it stayed over the Yucatan while I did and there was some shear from a strong trough or else a CAT 4+ easily into South Florida.


Based on satellite pics, I still think Wilma, Gilbert & even Mitch *looked* better than Tip.

Wilma beats 'em all, IMO.
0 likes   

wjs3
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:57 am

#66 Postby wjs3 » Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:05 am

AJC:

Is this what you're looking for?

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/Composites/Hour/

Links are on that page to daily composites, etc.

WJS3
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#67 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:52 pm

Wilma certainly is the queen of all storms beating out Katrina in my opinion


Wilma was unquestionably the most intense in the basin, and I give you the most awesome looking when she had that pinhole eye... a beautiful thing to see, but God help those in her way. But in my book, for obvious reasons, albeit with a female name, Katrina will always be the King of storms for the GOM, Category ranking notwithstanding.

Based on satellite pics, I still think Wilma, Gilbert & even Mitch *looked* better than Tip.


I have to agree.. while truly ENORMOUS in size.. even NOAA sites have her filling up the entire Western US, not nearly as "photogenic" as the ones you've cited, and as much as I HATE her, I'd say Katrina at her peak was also a much better "looking" storm.

Wilma beats 'em all, IMO.


In terms of sheer awe appearing, I'd have to agree.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#68 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:23 pm

Getting back to the main topic: I think Tip is Possible in the Atlantic, but the chance is very very small due to the size of Ocean needed to generate such a monster storm (and thus the area of low shear needed, and all the heat needed as fuel to keep it going).
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#69 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:56 pm

Getting back to the main topic: I think Tip is Possible in the Atlantic, but the chance is very very small due to the size of Ocean needed to generate such a monster storm (and thus the area of low shear needed, and all the heat needed as fuel to keep it going).


For all those reasons, and a few others, I think the chances on the high end of improbable. Perhaps not "impossible"... but very highly improbable.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

Jim Cantore

#70 Postby Jim Cantore » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:37 pm

thats pretty amazing, I want a satelitte shot of it lol
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#71 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:38 pm

Based on satellite pics, I still think Wilma, Gilbert & even Mitch *looked* better than Tip.


The sat pic posted here was not from Tip at its peak. Calamity has the image of Tip at its peak, which I should've saved the last time he posted it. :x
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#72 Postby Jim Cantore » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:39 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
Based on satellite pics, I still think Wilma, Gilbert & even Mitch *looked* better than Tip.


The sat pic posted here was not from Tip at its peak. Calamity has the image of Tip at its peak, which I should've saved the last time he posted it. :x


I have it too

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g154/HurricaneFloyd1999/WPAC/?action=view&current=TIP.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#73 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:40 pm

thanks floyd
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#74 Postby Jim Cantore » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:43 pm

no problem :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#75 Postby Cyclenall » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:57 pm

Whoa, I've never seen Tip at it's peak but just some other ones at CAT4! That is very nice but not perfect. It looks like Hurricane Wilma when she weakened to a CAT4 but only with a smaller eye. Doesn't look 870 Mb but looks more Sub-900 Mb.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#76 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:05 pm

Cyclenall wrote:Whoa, I've never seen Tip at it's peak but just some other ones at CAT4! That is very nice but not perfect. It looks like Hurricane Wilma when she weakened to a CAT4 but only with a smaller eye. Doesn't look 870 Mb but looks more Sub-900 Mb.


That doesn't look like it was exactly at peak, rather it looks like it's starting a ERC in the image posted. Still, I believe it was the morning after it peaked.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#77 Postby Cyclenall » Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:35 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
Cyclenall wrote:Whoa, I've never seen Tip at it's peak but just some other ones at CAT4! That is very nice but not perfect. It looks like Hurricane Wilma when she weakened to a CAT4 but only with a smaller eye. Doesn't look 870 Mb but looks more Sub-900 Mb.


That doesn't look like it was exactly at peak, rather it looks like it's starting a ERC in the image posted. Still, I believe it was the morning after it peaked.

Well is there any image of it at true peak then? Also, how do you know that image isn't of Tip when it was at peak?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#78 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:00 pm

looks like a classic category 5 hurricane, no question about it at all.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jr0d, Shawee, Sps123 and 43 guests