New Vortex

GulfBreezer · #1 Postby **GulfBreezer** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:24 pm

406
URNT12 KNHC 102355
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 10/2357Z
B. 19 DEG 33 MIN N
85 DEG 32 MIN W
C. 700 MB 3143 M
D. 35 KT
E. 9 DEG 30 NM
F. 175 DEG 39 KT
G. 086 DEG 049 NM
H. 1013 MB
I. 7 C/ 3025 M
J. 8 C/ 3033 M
K. 6 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 1345/7
O. .1 / 10 NM
P. AF980 0804A CLAUDETTE OB 07
MAX FL WIND 39 KT E QUAD 2341Z.

GulfBreezer · #2 Postby **GulfBreezer** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:25 pm

WOW..............I have a hard time believing these numbers...........INPUT PLEASE!!!!

DOES ANYONE OUT THERE HAVE A CLUE ABOUT THIS?

According to these ##'s she could just be a tropical wave????!!!!

Rainband · #3 Postby **Rainband** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:29 pm

Either she is toast or the center relocated to the north..by toast I mean light..not dark or burnt LOL :o

Thunder44 · #4 Postby **Thunder44** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:32 pm

If this relfects Claudette's true intensity, then storm maybe nothing more now than a minimal TS or Tropical Depression. Talk about fluctions in intensity! This storm dropped to 12 MBs then up 25 Mb all in less then 24 hours. You think this storm just moved inland over the mountains.

#5 Postby **Andrew92** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:33 pm

But still, Lili was on her last legs last year (though in a different location but still.........) and we saw what happened. :roll:

I'm still watching Claudette like a hawk.

-Andrew92

#6 Postby **pojo** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:35 pm

I can help you with this:

A. 10/2357Z (July 10th, 2357- 6hrs CDT= 1757 => 5:57pm)
B. 19 DEG 33 MIN N (19*N 33 minutes)
85 DEG 32 MIN W (85* W 32 mimutes)
C. 700 MB 3143 M (dropped dropwinsonde at 700 mb)
D. 35 KT (35 knots winds)
H. 1013 MB (1013 MB at Center of Circ)

wrkh99 · #7 Postby **wrkh99** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 8:02 pm

It's a bad recon fix. They made a very quick trip and gave up .

weatherlover427 · #8 Postby **weatherlover427** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 8:13 pm

So what does this mean?

Colin · #9 Postby **Colin** » Thu Jul 10, 2003 9:31 pm

I think it means it's wrong??? To me it seems like it...

#10 Postby **vbhoutex** » Fri Jul 11, 2003 12:57 am

wrkh99 wrote:It's a bad recon fix. They made a very quick trip and gave up .

James where are you coming up with this? They do not make a quick trip and turn around and go back home when they are flying hundreds of miles. they fly continuously for hours trying to make a fix using an x shaped pattern. It is now 1am cdt and I am getting recon in as I type this.

New Vortex

New Vortex

Who is online