Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145795
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#1 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:05 am

http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/Fo ... un2008.pdf

They add that the number of named storms includes the first named storm Arthur,that is why I put the * beside the 15.They also dont rule out El Nino.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#2 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:39 am

Wow we've alredy reached the June update, time has flown by!

Anyway yep they do leave the el nino option open but they are very havily in favor of cool neutral values remaining. All years they use as examples had above average ACE values, some seasons have been removed from the list like 1999.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#3 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:41 am

They way their forecasts have been performing over the past few years, they can't rule out anything. 15/8/4 is about the average between 95-07.
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

#4 Postby OuterBanker » Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:22 am

No change in numbers. Analog years did change and the years used for this forecast are very kind to the Carolinas (no hits, lots of near misses). That part is good although landfall probs for most of zone 8 (as well as 3 and 6) are about 55% higher than normal on their landfall prob page. Doesn't make much sense using those analog years. Or are those years used more based on activity and not track patterns (always had a question which is used).
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#5 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:27 am

Why the *?

15 Storms on Steriods? :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145795
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#6 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:32 am

They say in the report that if a Weak El Nino develops,anyway it will be an active season like the ones below that had a Weak El Nino:

1951
1953
1969
2004
0 likes   

User avatar
Decomdoug
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 177
Age: 72
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#7 Postby Decomdoug » Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:37 am

"Why the *?"

Includes Author
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#8 Postby RL3AO » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:06 pm

Decomdoug wrote:"Why the *?"

Includes Author


Arthur. An author is a person who writes a book.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#9 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:13 pm

I'm sorry but their credibilty is not what it use to be
especially when they make changes as the
season progresses. :roll: I think after what many of us have
seen the last 10 years we all know now that the numbers don't
mean much when it only takes one Katrina or Rita type to make it
a pretty active season for ANYONE.
0 likes   

HURRICANELONNY
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 am
Location: HOLLYWOOD.FL

Re: Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#10 Postby HURRICANELONNY » Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:05 pm

Current Atlantic Basin Conditions
Current conditions in the Atlantic basin are quite favorable for an active hurricane season. These conditions have trended even more favorable than were observed in early April. Our early June Atlantic predictor (Predictor 1) calls for a very active hurricane season in 2008. The current sea surface temperature pattern in the Atlantic is a pattern typically observed before very active seasons. Waters off the coast of Iberia as well as the eastern tropical Atlantic are very warm right now (Figure 10). In addition, cool SST anomalies in the central tropical Atlantic have moderated considerably over the past month (Figure 11). Sea level pressures have been below average throughout most of the eastern Atlantic during the month of May (Figure 12).
DOESN'T SOUND GOOD. I HOPE EL NINO COMES.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20016
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#11 Postby tolakram » Tue Jun 03, 2008 8:39 pm

Stormcenter wrote:I'm sorry but their credibilty is not what it use to be
especially when they make changes as the
season progresses. :roll: I think after what many of us have
seen the last 10 years we all know now that the numbers don't
mean much when it only takes one Katrina or Rita type to make it
a pretty active season for ANYONE.


If you look at what they are trying to do I think the science is solid and worthwhile. Going back and looking at various inputs to try and predict the current season should eventually work, but it will take a while. What I object to is the way they present the data to the media.
0 likes   

Ad Novoxium
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 348
Age: 35
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:12 am

Re:

#12 Postby Ad Novoxium » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:09 pm

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:Why the *?

15 Storms on Steriods? :lol:

If Humberto and Lorenzo were any indication...

RL3AO wrote:
Decomdoug wrote:"Why the *?"

Includes Author


Arthur. An author is a person who writes a book.

Arthur Shakespeare?
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Philip J. Klotzbach / Dr Gray June Forecast=15*/8/4

#13 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:28 am

HURRICANELONNY wrote:Current Atlantic Basin Conditions
Current conditions in the Atlantic basin are quite favorable for an active hurricane season. These conditions have trended even more favorable than were observed in early April. Our early June Atlantic predictor (Predictor 1) calls for a very active hurricane season in 2008. The current sea surface temperature pattern in the Atlantic is a pattern typically observed before very active seasons. Waters off the coast of Iberia as well as the eastern tropical Atlantic are very warm right now (Figure 10). In addition, cool SST anomalies in the central tropical Atlantic have moderated considerably over the past month (Figure 11). Sea level pressures have been below average throughout most of the eastern Atlantic during the month of May (Figure 12).
DOESN'T SOUND GOOD. I HOPE EL NINO COMES.


The point about the cooler SSt's moderating and now even becoming above average in a lot of places is a very good one bodes wwell for the idea of a higher number of majors compared with average, indeed the zone between 30-40N is well above average and if that continues we could see stronger storms up those latitudes then normal, esp given the reasonable chances for recurvature to occur.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#14 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 05, 2008 2:35 pm

Image

If the analog years are truly a vision of the season ahead, it will be a rough season.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#15 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:02 pm

What does it look like if you use the years:

1951, 1961, 2000, and 2001
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#16 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:14 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#17 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:35 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

If the analog years are truly a vision of the season ahead, it will be a rough season.


So much for the analog years!!!
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#18 Postby RL3AO » Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:37 pm

Yep. :lol:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sphelps8681 and 37 guests