Should be interesting.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57"
I'll be interested to see how that works. Would they issue a forecast for a disturbance that has a 20% chance of development in the next 48hrs (todays' outlook format) but a 70% chance by day 4 or 5? Or will they always have a lower chance of development in the extended range? Will they "go for it" or not? If, as they say, they'll be basing predictions greatly upon model guidance, then they'd have to go with higher development chances beyond 48 hrs in many cases.
brunota2003 wrote:Or maybe break into down into two segments. One example could be out to 72 hours and the other is 72 to 120 hours.
Users browsing this forum: Stratton23, USTropics and 46 guests