2014 Tropical Model Track/Intensity Verification

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

2014 Tropical Model Track/Intensity Verification

#1 Postby USTropics » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:12 am

I'm introducing this thread to examine how the models have performed thus far this year on a per storm basis. The post directly succeeding this one will look at how the models have performed in terms of track guidance (I will be adding intensity error in the near future). I will keep this updated with each new system introduced in the Atlantic.

Some notes first:
  • The error values I'm listing below are not official values by the NHC.
  • Most of the model guidance and raw data I will be presenting can be found here: http://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/aid_public/
  • I will provide a legend directly below these notes that will describe each model that is being included. I will also list the wiki page for more information as well as where the model runs can be located (if applicable).
  • The ECMWF is not present because it is a proprietary model. While there is public data available, it is not sustainable to produce efficient results short of manually recording the results of each run (which I will do when I have more time in the future).
  • I have included the experimental model UWN4 (see legend below for more details). I will also look to include the experimental model FIM in the future.
  • The data provided includes from the time the system was designated an invest (except for the NHC track, which does not start initialization until a TD forms). This is the average of the entire storm's model runs which is then verified against the actual position of the storm.
  • Don't put too much stock into the 0 hour positional error. Some models are given the start position of the system and others are not.
  • Lastly, keep in mind that every storm provides a different situation to model with a multitude of variables. No one particular model is best. A collection of models should always be analyzed for pattern recognition.

Legend:
Last edited by USTropics on Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: 2014 Tropical Model Track/Intensity Verification

#2 Postby USTropics » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:12 am

Image


Image
** The NHC track has such a high 5 day error due to the initial 5 day track (which was slow and more west then the eventual track). I would consider it an outlier but you can see the full 5 day graphic loop here to reference what I'm referring to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2014/graphics/al04/loop_5W.shtml

Image


Image


Image
Last edited by USTropics on Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: 2014 Tropical Model Track/Intensity Verification

#3 Postby USTropics » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:13 am

Reserved for intensity forecast error.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Hurricanehink and 45 guests