Here is the discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145505
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Here is the discussion
0 likes
-
Stormsfury
- Category 5
- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
Irregardless, preparations should be make for Isabel as a Cat 3 and as a strong CAT 3. Charleston, SC made those preparations assuming Hugo would be a CAT 3 and a strong CAT at that to play it safe. Remember, HUGO was at 105 mph on the morning of Sept. 21st, and by 6 pm, HUGO grew to 135 mph with a sudden burst of intensification just before landfall. (Best track and re-analysis put HUGO at 120 kts or 138 mph).
Intensity forecasts are the hardest things to gauge. I must admit, I gotta hand it to the SHIPS model which at the time seemed spurious about weakening Isabel as much as it did 5 days ago, but sure enough, Isabel is down to 105 mph.
SF
Intensity forecasts are the hardest things to gauge. I must admit, I gotta hand it to the SHIPS model which at the time seemed spurious about weakening Isabel as much as it did 5 days ago, but sure enough, Isabel is down to 105 mph.
SF
0 likes
-
SacrydDreamz
- Category 1
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:00 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
