Some strengthening? Looks that way..

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
SacrydDreamz
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:00 pm
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Some strengthening? Looks that way..

#1 Postby SacrydDreamz » Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:31 am

Not like yesterday when many of us were talking about convection wrapping around.. this looks different. Notice how the outflow has expanded to the west in the face of the shear and the center has reorganized further west as well under an infant CDO. If this trend continues I'd expect some modest strengthening as long as shear doesn't increase. Dry air is out there but it doesn't appear to be having quite the negative effect it did yesterday, though it still will hinder any strengthening. My very unskilled forecast.. a minimal cat 3 at landfall near Ocracoke Inlet, NC

Initial: 90kts.
12hr: 90kts.
24hr: 95kts.
36hr: 100kts.
48hr: 105kts.
60hr: 100kts.
72hr: 55kts. INLAND
96hr: 35kts. EXTRATROPICAL
Last edited by SacrydDreamz on Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

#2 Postby soonertwister » Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:45 am

If you are predicting 110 knots at landfall, that is a strong cat-3, not a weak one. 115 knots is a cat-4, but 5 knots up or down won't make that much of a difference.

Isabel could make landfall in an area that hasn't seen a major hurricane in a century, so the rightful concern is that the people there won't be fully prepared for the storm's impact. Very dangerous scenario, to be sure.
0 likes   

User avatar
SacrydDreamz
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:00 pm
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

#3 Postby SacrydDreamz » Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:21 am

Thanks for pointing that out!! I wasn't thinking properly with the conversion :oops: Anyhow, I also adjusted due to initial intensity
0 likes   

User avatar
JCT777
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6251
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 9:21 am
Location: Spring Mount, PA
Contact:

#4 Postby JCT777 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:38 am

Randy - your intensity for Isabel up until (and just after) landfall looks excellent - that is very close to what I think the intesity will be over the next 72 hours. :)
0 likes   

JoshL
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:11 am
Contact:

#5 Postby JoshL » Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:44 am

It does look like it might actually be getting better organized.
0 likes   

User avatar
vortex100
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 10:10 am
Location: Fayetteville, GA
Contact:

#6 Postby vortex100 » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:06 am

As mentioned by the NHC in the 11 am Discussion, the main problem is that the core of this storm has been severe disrupted. The convective bands are a mess. I have seen this happen many times in the past and it is very difficult, although not impossible, for a hurricane to regain strength after this type of disruption. Outflow is looking better and better, but if Isabel had about 4-5 days over warm water instead of just 2 there would be a better chance of a significant comeback. Even so, I am still expecting some strengthening to a top level cat 2 storm or low level cat 3 storm just before landfall.
0 likes   

Anonymous

Some red is back

#7 Postby Anonymous » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:15 am

Looks like it might be trying to intensify. Some red (deeper convection) has reappeared in the radar for the first time in a while. That's not good. Would rather it be weakening than intensifying as it nears its landfall approach.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... IR4/20.jpg
0 likes   

Guest

#8 Postby Guest » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:20 am

Well if my Hunch is correct we wont be dealing with nowhere near a 3...................More later!...............BTW we will be lucky if its a cat 2 when she goes in assuming my hunch is correct!.......................
0 likes   

User avatar
~SirCane
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 9:55 pm
Location: Pensacola, FL
Contact:

yeah..

#9 Postby ~SirCane » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:20 am

It does look a little better organized this morning. I don't see it being any stronger than 115mph at landfall.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#10 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:22 am

better organized? what are you seeing that I am not?
0 likes   

Anonymous

Deeper Convection

#11 Postby Anonymous » Tue Sep 16, 2003 11:29 am

Derek Ortt wrote:better organized? what are you seeing that I am not?


I do some red on the floater now -- which has not been present since yesterday. Maybe it is not a big deal or maybe it is trying to make a come back or at least hold its own.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... IR4/20.jpg
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dl20415, JaviT, Lizzytiz1 and 41 guests