Isabel heading toward a weakening faze

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
John
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Miami FL

Isabel heading toward a weakening faze

#1 Postby John » Wed Sep 17, 2003 10:21 pm

Hi Res, WV imagery strongly suggests that a large plum of dry air is continuing to entrain itself into the circulation center of Isabel, Isabel looks more like a Sub Tropical feature than the classic Hurricane she was just three days ago. There was only a slight drop in pressure reported by Recon, so I would expect the current intensity to be maintained a bit longer. The inner core structure is still not well defined, Isabel has a large Ragged banding type eye, such tropical Cyclones typically do not strengthen much if at all. IMO Isabel should continue to wind down slowly.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#2 Postby Stormsfury » Wed Sep 17, 2003 10:25 pm

I beg to differ ... IMO, Isabel may be trying to fight one last breath before landfall ... look at this WV imagery loop...

http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... geir3.html
0 likes   

koto26
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:52 pm

#3 Postby koto26 » Wed Sep 17, 2003 10:26 pm

Couldnt agree more SF
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#4 Postby Lindaloo » Wed Sep 17, 2003 10:39 pm

I agree SF... but look at all that dry air being pushed towards her.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

The deep reds are missing

#5 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:32 pm

I'm sorry but Isabel is still missing those deep (dark red in color) areas of convection around her eye wall. Her eye wall remains distorted and not well rounded. As long as she doesn't have this then she status quo or less. I've said this already a million times before, she looks very extra tropical. I know the data says otherwise but that what it looks like to me. She has never been the same since she started moving more northward toward the very cool dry air and shear. IMO
Last edited by Stormcenter on Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Wolfman21
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Roxboro, NC
Contact:

Re: The deep reds are missing

#6 Postby Wolfman21 » Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:34 pm

Stormcenter wrote:I'm sorry but Isabel is still missing those are deep (dark red in color) areas of convection around her eye wall. Her eye wall remains distorted and not well rounded. As long as she doesn't have this then she status quo or less. I've said this already a million times before, she looks very extra tropical. I know the data says otherwise but that what it looks like to me. She has never been the same since she started moving more northward toward the very cool dry air and shear. IMO


You cant judge a book by its cover buddy........
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

In this case I think you can...

#7 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:45 pm

In this case I think you can. Where is the deep convection around the eye wall? Don't get me wrong she will cause some major damage. I expect a lot wind but not as much rainfall as your "normal" tropical systems based on the dry she is coming into. Now sure things can change before she makes landfall but that's the way it stands as of right now. IMO
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

Re: The deep reds are missing

#8 Postby Stormsfury » Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:47 pm

Stormcenter wrote:I'm sorry but Isabel is still missing those are deep (dark red in color) areas of convection around her eye wall. Her eye wall remains distorted and not well rounded. As long as she doesn't have this then she status quo or less. I've said this already a million times before, she looks very extra tropical. I know the data says otherwise but that what it looks like to me. She has never been the same since she started moving more northward toward the very cool dry air and shear. IMO


Isabel is NOT extratropical ... RECON's already verified that ... 17C at the 700mb flight level is NOT extratropical. Latest IR imagery showing convection has totally wrapped around the center of Isabel once again. Isabel continues to fight and she will until she makes landfall ...

http://www.atmos.washington.edu/cgi-bin/latest.cgi?ir-e
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Didn't say that...

#9 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:56 pm

I didn't say she was "Extra Tropical". I said she "Looked extra tropical".
The fact is she does. Even though she may in not in fact be. I've tracked hurricanes for over 27 years and I've seen many of them via satellite imagery. She "looks" like many of the storms that become extra tropical in the atlantic as they move towards the north. The convection around the "eye wall" is not intense at all. The eye is VERY distorted and ragged.
The center is lopsided. Please look at past (2 days ago) infrared loops of Isabel before she started heading northward to see my point. The very cool dry air and shear are the key reasons for this. Like I said things can and may change before she makes landfall but that's the way I see it now. IMO

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes   

Guest

#10 Postby Guest » Thu Sep 18, 2003 12:13 am

Can someone PLEASE explain to me how that image below shows Isabel weakining????????????? I think NOT! Case closed!

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherluvr
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 653
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:25 pm
Location: Long Island NY

#11 Postby weatherluvr » Thu Sep 18, 2003 12:23 am

Off the top of my head I can think of at least a dozen hurricanes that looked a lot worse than this on satellite photos.
0 likes   

Wolfman21
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Roxboro, NC
Contact:

#12 Postby Wolfman21 » Thu Sep 18, 2003 12:29 am

[url]http:/www.weather.com/maps/news/atlstorm13/isabelcurrentposition_large.html[/url]

LOL, i dont see her weakening here..... maybe just me.... I see a defined EYE, and it looks to be coming together.... But hey, thats an amateur just looking.....
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Please read

#13 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 18, 2003 12:37 am

Please read the excerpt from the 11pm NHC discussion on Isabel.
It pretty much speaks for itself and what I've been trying to say.
Remember this is NOT me saying this it's the NHC. Nothing has changed since they wrote that. She still does NOT have any of what is mentioned below, bottom line. I would think you guys would be happy to know that instead of dissapointed.

ISABEL LACKS A WELL-DEFINED INNER CORE AND DEEP CONVECTION IS
MINIMAL AT THIS TIME. IN FACT...SATELLITE INTENSITY ESTIMATES
SUGGEST THAT MAXIMUM WINDS ARE ON THE ORDER OF 75 TO 80 KNOTS.
0 likes   

Guest

#14 Postby Guest » Thu Sep 18, 2003 12:47 am

Stormcenter......What i am arguing is that Sat above which is a recent shot (Not 11pm) and sence 11pm as that shows she has been looking better and better!
If i am NOT mistaken this thread is titled ( Isabel is headed towards a weakening faze)?????
Which that Sat CLEARLY shows otherwise! :)
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Never recovered

#15 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 18, 2003 8:05 am

Isabel has never recovered from her dry air/shear battle. She is now just a faint resemblance of what she once was. No folks despite all the worries Isabel will not be another Hugo. But she do some signifcant damage IF her winds are anything around 100 mph when she makes landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
WEATHER53
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: College Park, MD

#16 Postby WEATHER53 » Thu Sep 18, 2003 10:00 am

Several of the threads that contained a spirited, but civil, point-counterpoint about the idea that dry air would kill Isabel have apparemtly been taken down. Coming ashore at 100-110 mph is a Long way from being a goner. No one, no one, wanted a 150 mph hurricane but once the storm was down to the 110 and continued to show the ability to survive or deflect the dry air entrainment it was a bust to write this thing off. Sorta reminds me of winter where it is 40 but guys are harping that the cold air will come in at any moment and turn the rain to snow.
0 likes   

User avatar
JCT777
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6251
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 9:21 am
Location: Spring Mount, PA
Contact:

#17 Postby JCT777 » Thu Sep 18, 2003 10:36 am

Great points, 53. Certainly, Cat 2 Isabel is a dangerous storm to those living close to where she is making landfall.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cdenton12, duilaslol and 34 guests