Possibly highest Chesapeake Storm Surge Ever....

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

Possibly highest Chesapeake Storm Surge Ever....

#1 Postby Derecho » Fri Sep 19, 2003 5:55 pm

One reason for the "BUST!" posts are that a lot of the media were concentrated in places like Virginia Beach where not much happened.

The portions of the OBX that did suffer severe damage (Avon, Buxton, Ocracoke) were too cut off for even the media.

And as it turns out the really huge surge was up the Chesapeake Bay where no national media had staked itself out, really.

The local tidal rivers here are higher than I (or even old-timers) can ever remember. Fortunately, in my county my sister has been county planner for 20+ years and housing in flood areas has basically been eliminated; all we have are parks and fairgrounds in them.

But around the Chesapeake and Potomac the storm surge flooding has been enormous; higher than the 1933 hurricane and comparable to Hazel according to old-timers. Much of Annapolis and whole neighborhoods of Baltimore that have never flooded are underwater.

And there are whole areas of the southern Chesapeake (Crisfield, Tangier Islands, Smith Islands) I haven't heard anything about even on local news.
0 likes   

JetMaxx

#2 Postby JetMaxx » Fri Sep 19, 2003 6:54 pm

I agree with you Der....it's the worst flooding around Annapolis and Baltimore I've ever seen....and even worse than 1933; which is understandable since Isabel was a much deeper hurricane at landfall (957 vs 971 mb).

I warned folks this would be a bad hurricane and would put storm surge flooding in places it had never occurred before in any of our lifetimes...and sadly it did.

And if people think the northern Outer Banks (Nags Head, Kitty Hawk) were damaged, wait until they see what Isabel's storm surge did to the southern Outer Banks from Rodanthe and Avon to Hatteras, Ocracoke and Portsmouth.

I saw some video from a newschopper overflight about an hour ago, and there are motels, businesses, and beach homes that are gone in Hatteras Village....several houses left floating in Pamlico Sound WEST of Hatteras. The damage appears almost as bad as Dauphin Island and Gulf Shores did after Frederic; and is very reminiscent of the Florida panhandle coast after Opal....highways are washed away, cuts where the storm surge carved new channels in Hatteras Island; in fact, the storm surge damage in the Hatteras area appears far worse than after the passage of hurricane Emily in 1993.
0 likes   

floydchaser
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:21 pm

#3 Postby floydchaser » Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:15 pm

Storm surge was the major story with this storm. That's why this kind of track, which is very rare, is so dangerous for the mid-atlantic. The wind reports from Isabel are fairly weak, although they were also low for the 1933 storm. However, both took the same track, significantly impacting areas not used to hurricanes. Even though people associate the Outer Banks with hurricanes, they haven't ended up on the NE quad of a storm in a while. If Emily had plowed 20-30 miles farther inland, the result would have been devastating.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, gib, HurricaneFan, ouragans and 85 guests