The basic problem is that, as we have seen during the course of this lengthy Frances watch, the Saffir-Simpson intensity scale is inadequate to fully describe a hurricane. It gives a good idea of intensity in the very center of a storm, but no idea whatsoever of the size of the storm-force wind circulation. This has left TV meteorologists struggling to explain wind-field maps to average viewers who either tune out or scratch their heads in bafflement.
Clearly what is needed is a size descriptor which can be quickly and intuitively "grasped", if you'll pardon the expression. Given that most men, at least, will automatically and subliminally associate anything round with breasts, the clear choice is to use breast cup sizes. A small yet extremely intense storm like Andrew would be a Cat 5 A, or maybe even Cat 5 AA, while a large and intense storm like Frances was at one point would be a Cat 4 D, or even Cat 4 DD. Size classifications would be based on the diameter of the hurricane force wind field.
Having thought of the idea, I humbly suggest that this brilliant modification of the Saffir-Simpson Scale be called (after my august self) the "Saffir-Simpsom-Rooth Intensity/Size Scale".
Opinions?
Jan
