1979: Male names introduced in the Atlantic

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

1979: Male names introduced in the Atlantic

#1 Postby HurricaneBill » Thu Dec 16, 2004 2:47 pm

1979 marked a big change in the naming of Atlantic hurricanes. For the first time, male names were used. Right off the bat, Bob became the first male hurricane in the Atlantic.

This change came after Florida feminist Roxcy Bolton criticized the NHC for naming hurricanes with only female names. She said it was degrading to women. (25 years later, Bolton says she's still not satisfied with the naming lists but feels a compromise is better than nothing. She had wanted hurricanes named after senators.)

I'm just curious as to what you all felt prior to this. Did you find it sexist that only female names were used? Did you find it sexist that male names were being excluded? Or did you just feel "Who the heck cares?!".
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2044
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#2 Postby Hurricanehink » Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:16 pm

While I wasn't around, I would probably say who cares. It doesn't change a hurricane's personality whether it has a male or female name. If Hurricane Frankie, for example, would hit some place, it would do the same damage as if a Hurricane Brunhilda was coming.
0 likes   

User avatar
The Big Dog
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:30 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

#3 Postby The Big Dog » Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:44 pm

I never understood why it is degrading to women, but then I'm not a woman. I've heard that naming them after women began when mets named storms after their wives and girlfriends.

So why isn't she satisfied now? Alternating isn't good enough? It's certainly better than the senator idea. Hurricane Hillary? Hurricane Strom? Barack? Orrin? Arlen?
0 likes   

chadtm80

#4 Postby chadtm80 » Thu Dec 16, 2004 4:53 pm

Give me a break.. Who the heck cares.. Sounds like she will never be satisfied... Get a life lady
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#5 Postby Stormsfury » Thu Dec 16, 2004 5:08 pm

This change came after Florida feminist Roxcy Bolton criticized the NHC for naming hurricanes with only female names. She said it was degrading to women. (25 years later, Bolton says she's still not satisfied with the naming lists but feels a compromise is better than nothing. She had wanted hurricanes named after senators.)


wanted hurricanes named after senators? gee, there's a concept.

Only thing politicians can agree on ... increase our own pay and it's all about ME ...

SF
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#6 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:00 pm

It should be clear to the public that tropical cyclones in the Atlantic and in other parts of the world are given names to be able to identify them better. In the future everyone will remember Hurricane Iván, but will someone remember it as Hurricane #9 of '04? I don't think so. Thereafter, I can imagine how someone is going to get upset because Nature's worse creature is given names. After all, there's always someone that is upset about something.
0 likes   

User avatar
Gorky
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 334
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 am
Location: Scarborough, North Yorkshire, UK

#7 Postby Gorky » Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:34 pm

In maritime terms, most objects are referred to as 'she'. Naming hurricanes like this seems pretty normal to be honest. Just one case of political correctness gone crazy if you ask me. Still no harm in giving them male names I suppose although there wasn't much need to change.
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

A little off topic here....

#8 Postby george_r_1961 » Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:12 am

In 1988 forecaster Gil Clark of the NHC named the 7th storm of the season after himself; we all remember hurricane Gilbert. In 1969 the late John Hope, then NHC director, named the 3rd storm of the year after his daughter. Hurricane Camille.
0 likes   

User avatar
CharleySurvivor
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:38 pm
Location: Tampa, FL formerly Port Charlotte FL

#9 Postby CharleySurvivor » Mon Dec 20, 2004 7:36 am

Whatever they choose to name the hurricanes, there will always be a person to complain about it.

I am a female and really don't give a heck about the names.
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#10 Postby Andrew92 » Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:11 pm

I just want to say to her, guess what lady, if Hurricane Charley had instead been named, say, Hurricane Mallory or Hurricane Hillary or Hurricane Roxcy, it would have still done the same damage it did with the name Charley.

Some people will never be satisfied I guess.

-Andrew92
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Teban54 and 204 guests