"Some fluctuations in intensity are likely"

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 798
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

"Some fluctuations in intensity are likely"

#1 Postby tallywx » Wed Jun 01, 2005 8:49 pm

"Some fluctuations in intensity are likely before landfall"

We've all seen this line time and time again, published when a major hurricane is with 24 hours of landfall. Many times, we see it when the official forecast is for a storm to experience some weakening before landfall, but to remain on the safe side, they take the path of least regret.

It varies depending on how close a storm is to landfall. If a storm is out in the middle of the ocean with a particular expectation of weakening, they will state that expectation explicitly. But when lives are at stake, they'd rather broadbrush "fluctuations."

Question is, is there a preferable way to do this? If the NHC has a pretty good handle that more chances than not, a storm is going to weaken before landfall, and more chances than not, it ends up doing so, this creates potential problems. First of all, it makes people think they've experienced a stronger hurricane than they have (e.g. Opal, Ivan), meaning that their future expectations are not in line with reality in terms of what a particular strength of storm can do. Second, if the storm does weaken and people are aware of it, they misperceive the skill of the NHC (e.g. "the NHC said it was comin' in at 145, but it only hit at 115").

So how can we realistically convey the strength change that is actually expected, account for the remaining uncertainty of intensity forecasts, and inform the public in a manner that doesn't negatively influence future actions? What about listing a range of potential windspeeds at a 24 hour period. Is the NHC accurate enough to call a windspeed within one standard deviation? For example, instead of saying "fluctuations are expected" for Ivan, I believe they had enough skill to foresee that "Ivan is expected to hit with winds anywhere between 115 to 135 mph." Or with Charley, I believe they knew conditions were right for the type of intensification for which they could have said, "Charley is expected to hit with winds between 115 and 150 mph." That way, people know the current intensity but also the realistic possibilities of what they can expect, both best case and worst case.
Last edited by tallywx on Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Josephine96

#2 Postby Josephine96 » Wed Jun 01, 2005 8:51 pm

Some fluctuations are that the storm bombs.. :eek:
0 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 798
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

#3 Postby tallywx » Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:01 pm

Yeah, by the current definition, "fluctuation" basically covers any direction of strength change of any magnitude.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#4 Postby Brent » Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:21 pm

tallywx wrote:Yeah, by the current definition, "fluctuation" basically covers any direction of strength change of any magnitude.


Yep... :lol:
0 likes   
#neversummer


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 620 guests