Hammy wrote:Stratton23 wrote:Hammy the NAM is utter garbage with tropical development, its really only useful for winter, temperature and that sort of stuff
This is very true, when we're talking the track, because it overdevelops storms--but it's extremely useful in knowing when something is (or rather, isn't) going to develop.
I've used and familiarized myself with it for over a decade now, and it's ALWAYS, without fail, picked up these close to home storms well before any of the models do--it has spun up things that don't form, but not once has it actually missed a storm--if something's going to form in the Gulf, it's always the first to show it.
Given how hypersensitive this model is, if even it isn't showing development, then there isn't likely going to be any, the same way the UKMET is a near-certainty when it actually does show development (given it has the opposite issue of frequently missing storms)
It might have been Humberto where the NAM, joined by the Canadian, at that time called 'The Crazy Uncle' (they have made improvements) were the first to see development.