92L Invest - Western GOM - Sat Pics, Models, Comments, etc.

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#101 Postby wxman57 » Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:40 pm

I just don't see the high shear that he NHC is talking about. True, there are strong westerly winds along the northern Gulf coast but not over the convection near 22N-23N. Tropical storms can form with upper level winds like this. What I cannot understand at all is how 90L is still an invest and this isn't. 90L is in a much higher shear environment and has no convection. Just doesn't make sense. Maybe Jack Bevin has Sunday plans that don't include working? ;-) A tropical storm cannot form if the NHC ignores it.

It does look like the greatest threat of heavy rain will be into Louisiana rather than Texas, though.

Which disturbance appears better organized, 90L or the system in the Gulf. 90L is under extreme shear, much higher than that over the Gulf:

Image
Last edited by wxman57 on Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#102 Postby gatorcane » Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:42 pm

wxman57 wrote:I just don't see the high shear that he NHC is talking about. True, there are strong westerly winds along the northern Gulf coast but not over the convection near 22N-23N. Tropical storms can form with upper level winds like this. What I cannot understand at all is how 90L is still an invest and this isn't. 90L is in a much higher shear environment and has no convection. Just doesn't make sense. Maybe Jack Bevin has Sunday plans that don't include working? ;-) A tropical storm cannot form if the NHC ignores it.

It does look like the greatest threat of heavy rain will be into Louisiana rather than Texas, though.


WxMan I agree. It seems that the NHC wants to ignore this thing. It should be invest by now in my opinion. It also looks like you have changed your forecast to it being more of a LA event now rather than Texas. It does look like it is still caught up in the westerlies. Lets hope the shear stays high or rapid strengthening is likely given the high SSTs in the GOM right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#103 Postby wxman57 » Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:53 pm

Here's a surface plot. Tampico's pressure (wnw of the low) is down to 1007 mb. Pressure at the buoy east of the low is down 2mb in the past 3 hours. Dew points on the mid TX coast into the low-mid 70s. The front is washing out across the NW Gulf. SSTs in the 82-84F range. Shear is diminishing as the warm front moves inland into south LA tonight.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#104 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:01 pm

wxman57 wrote:I just don't see the high shear that he NHC is talking about. True, there are strong westerly winds along the northern Gulf coast but not over the convection near 22N-23N. Tropical storms can form with upper level winds like this. What I cannot understand at all is how 90L is still an invest and this isn't. 90L is in a much higher shear environment and has no convection. Just doesn't make sense. Maybe Jack Bevin has Sunday plans that don't include working? ;-) A tropical storm cannot form if the NHC ignores it.

It does look like the greatest threat of heavy rain will be into Louisiana rather than Texas, though.

Which disturbance appears better organized, 90L or the system in the Gulf. 90L is under extreme shear, much higher than that over the Gulf:

Image clipped


Not if the 18Z NAM is correct: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_060l.gif
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#105 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:03 pm

in that NAM what is goin on in the atlantic in the far right of that picture.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#106 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:05 pm

fact789 wrote:in that NAM what is goin on in the atlantic in the far right of that picture.
that NAM image is showing total precipitation between now and 60 hrs. from now, so there must be a lot of rain that should fall out in that area during that time.

The big thing to notice though is the bullseye of widespread 5-7" of rain in parts of SE Texas from this system.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#107 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:08 pm

And that same map could easily shift east towards Louisiana, with the area being so broad.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#108 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:09 pm

The system is sheared in that most of the convection is to the north and east of the low center. However it's not that much removed from the center yet and if deep convection persists throughout the night, than I think it will have a better chance of development.
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

#109 Postby perk » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:10 pm

Ok now for the million dollar question, where's this system gonna end up.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#110 Postby ROCK » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:13 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:And that same map could easily shift east towards Louisiana, with the area being so broad.



or it could shift west.....
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#111 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:19 pm

ROCK wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:And that same map could easily shift east towards Louisiana, with the area being so broad.



or it could shift west.....


Mexico? Possible.....

Lower and Middle Texas coast are already under FFW's....

Unless you are talking tropical formation...
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#112 Postby southerngale » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:24 pm

A lot of the rain is moving to the north or NW into southern Texas. NHC said the whole system was nearly stationary....is that still so?

Radar Loop

(not the best radar for details, but I like it for showing the general direction and it covers a large area)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#113 Postby wxman57 » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:39 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:/quote]

Not if the 18Z NAM is correct: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_060l.gif


The NAM/WRF is about the worst model to use in the tropics. I haven't seen it even close to being correct with any system this year or last.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#114 Postby LAwxrgal » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:42 pm

I have a question. Will this system even have time to form before making "landfall" somewhere on the coast?
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

Rainband

#115 Postby Rainband » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:45 pm

according to the satellite the low is over land


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-avn.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#116 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:46 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:/quote]

Not if the 18Z NAM is correct: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_060l.gif


The NAM/WRF is about the worst model to use in the tropics. I haven't seen it even close to being correct with any system this year or last.
we arn't just looking at a "tropical" system though. I thought our rain/svr. weather was going to be caused by a number of different things coming together over the area.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#117 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:10 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:/quote]

Not if the 18Z NAM is correct: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_060l.gif


The NAM/WRF is about the worst model to use in the tropics. I haven't seen it even close to being correct with any system this year or last.
we arn't just looking at a "tropical" system though. I thought our rain/svr. weather was going to be caused by a number of different things coming together over the area.


The NAM sucks at everything beyond 24 hours. Period.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#118 Postby gatorcane » Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:12 pm

The NAM sucks at everything beyond 24 hours. Period.


oooooo :grr: :grr: :eek:

Florida 3
Auburn 3
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#119 Postby ROCK » Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:19 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:/quote]

Not if the 18Z NAM is correct: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_060l.gif


The NAM/WRF is about the worst model to use in the tropics. I haven't seen it even close to being correct with any system this year or last.
we arn't just looking at a "tropical" system though. I thought our rain/svr. weather was going to be caused by a number of different things coming together over the area.


The NAM sucks at everything beyond 24 hours. Period.



"cough" alberto..... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5302
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#120 Postby Nimbus » Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:35 pm

The anticyclone seems to still be centered back near the Mexican coastline. Should get at least one more big convective burst near the coast. Maybe the NHC feels the trough coming in from the west will sweep all this out? Anyone have the surface pressure tendencies?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, lilbump3000 and 31 guests