
0z GFS has a hurricane by Oaxaca but also somehow doesn’t have a displaced ULAC shearing it. So yea don’t think this is happening.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Yellow Evan wrote:https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/899428152688914512/image0.jpg
18z GFS brings a hurricane almost onshore near Guerrero.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/899429404638347324/gfs_shear_epac_25.png
Very good upper level setup but no idea if flow will be uniform.
aspen wrote:After how badly the GFS performed with Pamela and given the recent development of the La Niña, a very good UL pattern doesn’t matter. “Future Rick” will also have far less time over water than Pamela. Looks to be a late season version of Amanda ‘20.
aspen wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/899428152688914512/image0.jpg
18z GFS brings a hurricane almost onshore near Guerrero.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/733552978572869632/899429404638347324/gfs_shear_epac_25.png
Very good upper level setup but no idea if flow will be uniform.
After how badly the GFS performed with Pamela and given the recent development of the La Niña, a very good UL pattern doesn’t matter. “Future Rick” will also have far less time over water than Pamela. Looks to be a late season version of Amanda ‘20.
Ubuntwo wrote:aspen wrote:After how badly the GFS performed with Pamela and given the recent development of the La Niña, a very good UL pattern doesn’t matter. “Future Rick” will also have far less time over water than Pamela. Looks to be a late season version of Amanda ‘20.
Way too early to get that specific let alone list off analogues. Very high run to run variation.
The GFS spins up the system faster than any other model, and it is the only one to depict a quick landfall. The model tends to struggle with convective feedback in monsoon troughs which can be exacerbated by tehuantepecer. Take its solution with a big load of salt.
Upper divergence is always important in tropical cyclones. La Nina is not gonna change that
Yellow Evan wrote:GFS is also wanting to spin up multiple tropical cyclones out of the monsoon trough which may explain the northward track but on the other hand this could lead to a faster than modeled genesis.
Ubuntwo wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:GFS is also wanting to spin up multiple tropical cyclones out of the monsoon trough which may explain the northward track but on the other hand this could lead to a faster than modeled genesis.
The GFS also has a more pronounced break in the ridge, compared to the Euro and CMC.
https://i.imgur.com/kkgC89n.png
https://i.imgur.com/6ZKfBo2.png
Ubuntwo wrote:aspen wrote:After how badly the GFS performed with Pamela and given the recent development of the La Niña, a very good UL pattern doesn’t matter. “Future Rick” will also have far less time over water than Pamela. Looks to be a late season version of Amanda ‘20.
Way too early to get that specific let alone list off analogues. Very high run to run variation.
The GFS spins up the system faster than any other model, and it is the only one to depict a quick landfall. The model tends to struggle with convective feedback in monsoon troughs which can be exacerbated by tehuantepecer. Take its solution with a big load of salt.
Upper divergence is always important in tropical cyclones. La Nina is not gonna change that
aspen wrote:I was only listing Amanda as an analogue because of a similar genesis location just south of Guatemala/El Salvador/SE Mexico, with a landfall on the coast. There have been other storms like that too. If this disturbance tries to spin-up quickly, perhaps it could be like Max ‘17, rapidly becoming a low-end hurricane before landfall.
Users browsing this forum: HurricaneBelle, Ulf and 165 guests