
Note:This pass was by mid afternoon EDT.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
MiamiensisWx wrote:On the surface, most of the audience appears to have been taught to immediately reject all contrary evidence from those who do not expect cyclogenesis. Unfortunately, this attitude has been unintentionally encouraged, and hostility toward posters who denounce development in certain cases is increasing. If this attitude continues, I will stop providing my objective analyses to this site. The "head powers" have done a nice job with the management of the site, but I feel my presence is unwarranted. Anyone who is familiar with me knows that I do not debunk or deny all probabilities for cyclogenesis. In fact, I was (initially) consistently calling for the plausible development of Arthur in the southern Caribbean Sea in late May; though the timing was incorrect and I eventually changed my views, we still witnessed it, despite doubts from others. I will undoubtedly lurk, but further posts will not occur. You will immediately realize the invaluable necessities of an objective person if illogical conclusions spiral out of control. The fact remains clear that most of the pro-development arguments are invalid, and the facts illustrated in my previous post have not been soundly addressed. It is one thing to disagree with a post's hypothesis and supporting evidence/proofs, which should be encouraged; it is an entirely different situation when the other person does not back his/her arguments with contrary data. The latter reality continues to be a predominant force on this forum. If you want to observe and scrutinize my free analyses, please see my site at http://www.freewebs.com/emdolphinwx/analyses.htm. Time and frequency of daily analyses is dependent on external factors that I can't control.
I am done. It's been an enjoyable experience over the past four seasons, but my public appearance is finally and dutifully coming to an end.
Goodbye..
MiamiensisWx wrote:I'll briefly re-enter the thread and deposit one final notice.
I have never taken any of the "illogical" or ignorant posts/forecasts to heart; this forum does not constitute my life or critical priorities. There are numerous well rounded and heavily savvy posters here, including those from amateurs, met students, and meteorologists. Unfortunately (and regretfully), there are also several "other" anonymous posters who regularly leave their imprint of false science, poor circular reasonings, or no supporting proof for their illogical posts. They occasionally (read: often) persuade even the more rational posters to concur with them. The crux is that the pressure to "bow down" and support these types of posts from anyone has become intolerable. I feel that any well reasoned scientific response to these posts (without any personal attacks) are immediately branded as false, etc. Therefore, it is the sane decision for me to permanently abandon this forum, though I will lurk.
Ed Mahmoud wrote:MiamiensisWx wrote:I'll briefly re-enter the thread and deposit one final notice.
I have never taken any of the "illogical" or ignorant posts/forecasts to heart; this forum does not constitute my life or critical priorities. There are numerous well rounded and heavily savvy posters here, including those from amateurs, met students, and meteorologists. Unfortunately (and regretfully), there are also several "other" anonymous posters who regularly leave their imprint of false science, poor circular reasonings, or no supporting proof for their illogical posts. They occasionally (read: often) persuade even the more rational posters to concur with them. The crux is that the pressure to "bow down" and support these types of posts from anyone has become intolerable. I feel that any well reasoned scientific response to these posts (without any personal attacks) are immediately branded as false, etc. Therefore, it is the sane decision for me to permanently abandon this forum, though I will lurk.
I went back and reread page 5. I think you had a lot more science behind you than the 2 or 3 doubters/pro-development posters who followed, but I don't think they were being disrepsectful.
People who visit often know who makes scientific forecasts, and who predicts the second coming of Hurricane Dennis.
wxman57 wrote:Convection appears to be weakening a little this evening as the lower-level swirl moves offshore. Looks very much like the wave that moved offshore (and fell apart) a few days ago. I know a lot of you here can't wait for the next storm to develop, but don't put too much hope on this one. It's unlikely to make "invest" much less become a TD. The next 24-48 hours will tell the story. If convection falls apart completely over the next 24 hours then it's gone.
cycloneye wrote:This pic looks like fire all around but its Water Vapor.
Infared imagery
Low cloud imagery
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests