Invest 97L E Windwards,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#121 Postby LAwxrgal » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:01 pm

Wow we got the invest... :eek: Things are really getting going now.
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#122 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:02 pm

cycloneye wrote:http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html

Invest 97L!!!!!


I no see it?
0 likes   

User avatar
fwbbreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 896
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 10:09 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

#123 Postby fwbbreeze » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:02 pm

cycloneye wrote:http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html

Invest 97L!!!!!


Here comes the acticvity many have ben hoping for!! :lol:
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#124 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:03 pm

jhamps10 wrote:is it just me, or am I seeing a small circulation area on vis shot at 46W 9 or 10 N?

Can I please get a confirmation on this?


It's not a closed LLC. There is vorticity...but it is not closed.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4008
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#125 Postby AJC3 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:03 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Wthrman13 wrote:Who needs floaters when you have the NASA GHCC loops?

http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES

I pretty much never look at the SSD loops unless I want to use the overlays. The GHCC images, when zoomed in with 100% quality, are both better image quality and better temporal resolution than just about anything else available on the web.

8-)


I totally agree. I think most people just don't know about the GHCC, that's why they look at the SSD. I only look at the SSD when 1) I want to see an overlay and 2) I want to auto-update...so when I go to bed I can open my laptop up in the middle of the night (when a system is out there I am watching) and see the very latest...instead of refreshing.

But...when it comes to trying to truly see what is going on...GHCC is the way to go for the average weather buff who only has public access. It has a lot better zoom capability and updates anywhere b/w 2x more often to 6x more often...depending on the mode they have it in (when you are in the 1KM field).

Why would you not want this?

Or this?

I can always tell when someone is trying to close off a circulation by using the SSD. :lol:

Edit: I also use the SSD to get my channel 2 imagery. Too bad GHCC hasn't added that.


Or a better enhancement for WV imagery.

Also, what i use at home is a great companion program that makes it very easy to compose/name your own subsectors within the predefined GHCC sectors. It's called GHCCSAT by Mike Bryson.

http://www.nexrad3.com/GhccSat.html
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145952
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#126 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:04 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#127 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:05 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/trop_ge_vis_float1_0.html
OMIT images 173, 174 and 180.
This should soon be our next invest.


Wow I was actually right for once. :eek:
0 likes   

jhamps10

#128 Postby jhamps10 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:05 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
jhamps10 wrote:is it just me, or am I seeing a small circulation area on vis shot at 46W 9 or 10 N?

Can I please get a confirmation on this?


It's not a closed LLC. There is vorticity...but it is not closed.


I didn't say that it was closed, but thanks for the confirm AFM. I could tell that it was still open, but as I see now we have a new invest on it, so looks like it will be time to stay up till 1 or 2 AM to track this one. Because this one IMO is a bigger threat to the US than TD 4.
0 likes   

User avatar
crownweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 596
Age: 51
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am
Location: Sturbridge, Massachusetts
Contact:

#129 Postby crownweather » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:06 pm

I was a little surprised by the text of the 205 pm TWD:

TROPICAL WAVE IS ALONG 46W S OF 20N MOVING W NEAR 15 KT. THIS
WAVE CONTINUES TO BE FAIRLY WELL-DEFINED WITH BROAD LOW-MID
CYCLONIC TURNING NOTED ABOUT THE AXIS. A LOW-MID LEVEL SWIRL IS
STILL EVIDENT ALONG THE WAVE NEAR 10.5N. DESPITE ITS
STRUCTURE...DEEP CONVECTION REMAINS MINIMAL AND CONFINED WITHIN
THE ITCZ. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THIS WAVE DOES NOT APPEAR
LIKELY AS ITS OVERALL STRUCTURE REMAINS BROAD AND THE NRN
EXTENSION OF THE WAVE REMAINS EMBEDDED IN A LARGE AREA OF
SAHARAN DUST.

Was surprised that they aren't expecting further development when the 1130 am TWO mentioned slow development.

Rob Lightbown
Crown Weather Services
http://www.crownweather.com
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

#130 Postby miamicanes177 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:07 pm

large area of 30kt shear just to the north of 97L. Hopefully this thing will get the life sheared out of it.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#131 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:08 pm

AJC3 wrote:
Or a better enhancement for WV imagery.

Also, what i use at home is a great companion program that makes it very easy to compose/name your own subsectors within the predefined GHCC sectors. It's called GHCCSAT by Mike Bryson.

http://www.nexrad3.com/GhccSat.html


Yeah...a better enhancement on the WV would be nice.

Thanks for the program. I always just modify the parameters I have...moving the lat/long around from the bookmark I've made.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#132 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:09 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:large area of 30kt shear just to the north of 97L. Hopefully this thing will get the life sheared out of it.


It would appear that the shear is a little far to the north to have any affects on it as of right now.
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... g8shr.html

However in time it could become a factor in development.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145952
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#133 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:09 pm

DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL972006) ON 20060822 1800 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS... ...36 HRS...
060822 1800 060823 0600 060823 1800 060824 0600

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 10.0N 47.0W 10.2N 49.5W 10.5N 51.6W 10.6N 53.3W
BAMM 10.0N 47.0W 10.2N 50.1W 10.6N 52.7W 11.1N 55.0W
A98E 10.0N 47.0W 10.1N 50.4W 10.3N 53.7W 10.8N 56.7W
LBAR 10.0N 47.0W 10.1N 50.1W 10.5N 53.1W 11.0N 56.1W
SHIP 25KTS 28KTS 30KTS 34KTS
DSHP 25KTS 28KTS 30KTS 34KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS... ..120 HRS...
060824 1800 060825 1800 060826 1800 060827 1800

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMD 10.9N 54.8W 11.5N 57.5W 11.8N 60.7W 11.6N 65.4W
BAMM 11.9N 57.0W 13.8N 59.9W 15.8N 63.0W 17.5N 66.1W
A98E 11.3N 59.3W 12.6N 63.7W 14.0N 67.6W 16.1N 71.5W
LBAR 11.4N 59.1W 12.4N 64.3W 15.8N 69.2W .0N .0W
SHIP 39KTS 47KTS 49KTS 51KTS
DSHP 39KTS 47KTS 49KTS 51KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 10.0N LONCUR = 47.0W DIRCUR = 270DEG SPDCUR = 17KT
LATM12 = 10.0N LONM12 = 43.5W DIRM12 = 270DEG SPDM12 = 16KT
LATM24 = 10.0N LONM24 = 40.0W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 0NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1009MB OUTPRS = 1011MB OUTRAD = 100NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM


First model plots for 97L.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#134 Postby LAwxrgal » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:11 pm

hmm....Ships develops this system slowly but surely.... 51kts in 5 days.... would this be Ernesto if it develops?
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

jhamps10

#135 Postby jhamps10 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:12 pm

yeah, because I think that we will have debby at 5 PM based on looking at sat. data
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#136 Postby MWatkins » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:15 pm

crownweather wrote:I was a little surprised by the text of the 205 pm TWD:

TROPICAL WAVE IS ALONG 46W S OF 20N MOVING W NEAR 15 KT. THIS
WAVE CONTINUES TO BE FAIRLY WELL-DEFINED WITH BROAD LOW-MID
CYCLONIC TURNING NOTED ABOUT THE AXIS. A LOW-MID LEVEL SWIRL IS
STILL EVIDENT ALONG THE WAVE NEAR 10.5N. DESPITE ITS
STRUCTURE...DEEP CONVECTION REMAINS MINIMAL AND CONFINED WITHIN
THE ITCZ. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THIS WAVE DOES NOT APPEAR
LIKELY AS ITS OVERALL STRUCTURE REMAINS BROAD AND THE NRN
EXTENSION OF THE WAVE REMAINS EMBEDDED IN A LARGE AREA OF
SAHARAN DUST.

Was surprised that they aren't expecting further development when the 1130 am TWO mentioned slow development.

Rob Lightbown
Crown Weather Services
http://www.crownweather.com


I believe that is the opinion of that paticular TAFB forecaster...who also BTW has done some work (I think) with Saharan Dust.

However...all indications are the NHC is thinking there could be some development...although deep convection is limited the structure of this system has improved since yesterday. The dry air to the north may be an inhibiting factor...but not one that would completely shut down development.

Hence, the invest...

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#137 Postby Stratosphere747 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:17 pm

Never really thought of this...

But are the forecasters that write the TWDs based in Miami?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#138 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:18 pm

John has not done much work with Saharan dust

His research centered on topographic impacts of PR and Hispaniola on Hurricane Georges, thats his specialty, though he did get a daily spiel from me on dry air interactions

I'm going to see what he's thinking on this one
0 likes   

jhamps10

#139 Postby jhamps10 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:18 pm

I would think so, cause NHC is in miami
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#140 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:19 pm

MWatkins wrote:
crownweather wrote:I was a little surprised by the text of the 205 pm TWD:

TROPICAL WAVE IS ALONG 46W S OF 20N MOVING W NEAR 15 KT. THIS
WAVE CONTINUES TO BE FAIRLY WELL-DEFINED WITH BROAD LOW-MID
CYCLONIC TURNING NOTED ABOUT THE AXIS. A LOW-MID LEVEL SWIRL IS
STILL EVIDENT ALONG THE WAVE NEAR 10.5N. DESPITE ITS
STRUCTURE...DEEP CONVECTION REMAINS MINIMAL AND CONFINED WITHIN
THE ITCZ. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THIS WAVE DOES NOT APPEAR
LIKELY AS ITS OVERALL STRUCTURE REMAINS BROAD AND THE NRN
EXTENSION OF THE WAVE REMAINS EMBEDDED IN A LARGE AREA OF
SAHARAN DUST.

Was surprised that they aren't expecting further development when the 1130 am TWO mentioned slow development.

Rob Lightbown
Crown Weather Services
http://www.crownweather.com

I believe that is the opinion of that paticular TAFB forecaster...who also BTW has done some work (I think) with Saharan Dust.
However...all indications are the NHC is thinking there could be some development...although deep convection is limited the structure of this system has improved since yesterday. The dry air to the north may be an inhibiting factor...but not one that would completely shut down development.
Hence, the invest...
MW

Mike looking the Visible pictures as of yesterday there was a lot of Dust surrounding this area.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... col-3.html

today there is less dust as it has moved fairly quickly to the west.
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... rucol.html
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 39 guests