#149 Postby LarryWx » Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:36 am
I recall the MJO NOT being a reliable indicator at all last year.
Of course, last year not being reliable could have been an "outlier" of sorts. Nevertheless, in my opinion, it is unproven statistically. I'd love to see a hard statistical study on MJO. I'm betting that one of the problems is that classifying wet or dry is subjective/inexact, sort of like the qualifications for a negative NAO.
Last edited by
LarryWx on Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.