Rainband wrote:From this point on I am only listening to the NHC
and of course EF Hutton...

Moderator: S2k Moderators
and his thoughts would be just as reckless as they were before.
Stratosphere747 wrote:AFM...
Is there even a distinct center yet? Still seems as if it is very broad and seems to still have a small centers popping up here and there when running a 30 loop run on the GHC site.
It also looks to be taking that more westward movement as that the NHC forecasted.
Scott
Zadok wrote:and his thoughts would be just as reckless as they were before.
Well sitting here in a rental apartment in West palm Beach after going through Frances and Jeanne last year his "thoughts" don't seem all that reckless to me. I would like to hear them. As far as I know he never personally attacted anyone although he came under personal attack himself.
Air Force Met wrote:Zadok wrote:and his thoughts would be just as reckless as they were before.
Well sitting here in a rental apartment in West palm Beach after going through Frances and Jeanne last year his "thoughts" don't seem all that reckless to me. I would like to hear them. As far as I know he never personally attacted anyone although he came under personal attack himself.
Maybe we define reckless differently. Making a forecast with no data to back you up...including some very bad observations (garbage in...garbage out) over a couple-week period...and then never backing it up or debating an issue when people bring up your flawed data...only then to change your mind 180 degrees the other way...is what I define as reckless...and when you do that...you bring on personal attacks yourself.
Now...a big problem people have here (epsecially new people) is they think this board is like other boards (no names) where you can make off the wall predictions (like Great One...he whose name is not mentioned) without any accountability. This is not that type of board. This is a board for serious discussions (most of the time) about the tropics...not a place for wild speculation (which in his case was made as if it were FACT) without rebuttal. If that is the kind of board people want (where you can have any unbased opinion count as equally as anyone's elses and where you are never challenged or held accountable)...then this is not the place for them.
Nto all "opinions" are equal....and even though this is a free society where opinions should be heard...not every opinion MUST be heard. Nobody has the right to be heard...only the right to say it....but not the right to make people hear it. Not all opinions are equal...and frankly...a lot of opinions are worthless and not based on anything other than pure speculation and wishes. If that's the kind of place people want...then they need to look elsewhere...because that is mpt Storm2K....and this is the EXACT reason I am here and not on other boards...because by and large...these people are serious about the weather and want to get it right...rather than just make some wild guesses and say "oh well" when they blow it time after time.
NHC says it's movingStormcenter wrote:Well at 5pm the NHC says Katrina is moving NW at 9mph.
What am I missing on satellite and radar. It sure looks like she's
moving w or wnw the last 6 hours. But hey if the NHC says it's moving
NW then it's moving NW.![]()
http://www.srh.weather.gov/radar/loop/D ... kamx.shtml
Air Force Met wrote:Zadok wrote:and his thoughts would be just as reckless as they were before.
Well sitting here in a rental apartment in West palm Beach after going through Frances and Jeanne last year his "thoughts" don't seem all that reckless to me. I would like to hear them. As far as I know he never personally attacted anyone although he came under personal attack himself.
Maybe we define reckless differently. Making a forecast with no data to back you up...including some very bad observations (garbage in...garbage out) over a couple-week period...and then never backing it up or debating an issue when people bring up your flawed data...only then to change your mind 180 degrees the other way...is what I define as reckless...and when you do that...you bring on personal attacks yourself.
Now...a big problem people have here (epsecially new people) is they think this board is like other boards (no names) where you can make off the wall predictions (like Great One...he whose name is not mentioned) without any accountability. This is not that type of board. This is a board for serious discussions (most of the time) about the tropics...not a place for wild speculation (which in his case was made as if it were FACT) without rebuttal. If that is the kind of board people want (where you can have any unbased opinion count as equally as anyone's elses and where you are never challenged or held accountable)...then this is not the place for them.
Nto all "opinions" are equal....and even though this is a free society where opinions should be heard...not every opinion MUST be heard. Nobody has the right to be heard...only the right to say it....but not the right to make people hear it. Not all opinions are equal...and frankly...a lot of opinions are worthless and not based on anything other than pure speculation and wishes. If that's the kind of place people want...then they need to look elsewhere...because that is mpt Storm2K....and this is the EXACT reason I am here and not on other boards...because by and large...these people are serious about the weather and want to get it right...rather than just make some wild guesses and say "oh well" when they blow it time after time.
FlSteel wrote:It almost looks like she has ingested some dry air into her center and that is preventing her from strengthening too much. TWC said that the press has dropped 3mb. So I guess she is beginning to strengthen some.
WITH THE IMPROVED BANDING FEATURES...SYMMETRICAL UPPER-LEVEL OUTFLOW
...AND RELATIVELY WEAK SHEAR...AT LEAST STEADY INTENSIFICATION OF A
NORMAL RATE OF 10 KT PER 12 HOURS UNTIL LANDFALL OCCURS SEEMS
JUSTIFIED. THIS IS SIMILAR TO THE SHIPS INTENSITY MODEL...BUT MUCH
LESS THAN THE NOW VERY BULLISH GFDL MODEL WHICH BRINGS KATRINA TO
111 KT JUST BEFORE LANDFALL. IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT THAT WITH
SSTS NEAR 31C AND A LOW SHEAR ENVIRONMENT...CONDITIONS ARE
FAVORABLE FOR POSSIBLE RAPID INTENSIFICATION TO OCCUR BETWEEN NOW
AND LANDFALL. THIS IS SUGGESTED BY THE SHIPS MODEL EXPERIMENTAL
RAPID INTENSIFICATION OUTPUT...WHICH INDICATES A 57 PERCENT
PROBABILITY OF THAT OCCURRING. THE ONLY INHIBITING FACTOR IS THE
DRY AIR THAT SURROUNDS KATRINA AND HAS BEEN WORKING ITS WAY INTO
THE INNER-CORE REGION AND ERODING THE DEEP CONVECTION. IF THE DRY
AIR MIXES OUT WITHIN THE NEXT 12 HOURS...THEN INTENSITIES WOULD
LIKELY BE HIGHER THAN THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS INDICATING.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests