T.S Ernesto #10 Sat pics, analysis, models thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- storms in NC
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
- Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
- Contact:
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23006
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
ConvergenceZone wrote:wxman57 wrote:One thing I'm sure of, there's no LLC near 15.1N/71.4W (extrapolated from NHC's 15Z position of 15.1/71.2). Nothing even remotely looking like low-level clouds rotating there. Do any of you see an LLC west of the convection? That was the point of my original post.
There is a moderate MLC to the northeast near 15.7N/70.5W, but no observations to confirm an LLC. Look at the arc of clouds streaming westward south of the DR. Squalls streaming away to the west don't indicate a significant inflow. I am not saying there is no closed low there, but it may be more broad and weaker than earlier today.
We will have to wait for the plane to see just where the center is. I think it looks less organized than earlier.
wxman57, isn't this a bit expected though with the shear conditions it's had to go through?? I know I didn't expect it to go through this shear and come out looking really good. I just knew that for it's survival it had to remain at least A LITTLE bit together. That convection isn't going to die down anytime soon. I'm surprised it looks even THIS good. Once I knew it had the shear to encounter, I was expecting maybe a marginal tropical storm or tropical depression, and then AFTER it passes the shear, THEN the storm would explode.
Correct, we didn't expect any strengthening today (yesterday).
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
I may need to get off this site for a few hours. I am seeing too much crazy talk all of the sudden.
I am amazed by how people cling onto these models (which have been performing poorly) as if they were gods. One run of the GFS (that is much different than the previous run) is not going to be the answer to anything.

0 likes
- skysummit
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5305
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Ponchatoula, LA
- Contact:
Steve wrote:>>From my experience the last 2 years the GFS hasn't done bad once it picks a system up.
But it's been handling handoffs awfully beyond 72 hours. We'll have to see how this plays out IMHO.
Steve
Right. It's been handling well once it's picked storms up, but I don't believe it's picked it up yet. What makes you think the GFS has now picked up on Ernesto?
0 likes
- Wthrman13
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
- Location: West Lafayette, IN
- Contact:
wxman57 wrote:One thing I'm sure of, there's no LLC near 15.1N/71.4W (extrapolated from NHC's 15Z position of 15.1/71.2). Nothing even remotely looking like low-level clouds rotating there. Do any of you see an LLC west of the convection? That was the point of my original post.
There is a moderate MLC to the northeast near 15.7N/70.5W, but no observations to confirm an LLC. Look at the arc of clouds streaming westward south of the DR. Squalls streaming away to the west don't indicate a significant inflow. I am not saying there is no closed low there, but it may be more broad and weaker than earlier today.
We will have to wait for the plane to see just where the center is. I think it looks less organized than earlier.
I'll have to agree with AFM here. The LLC is almost certainly still there. I can clearly see westerly inflow on the SW side of the convection, and, speeding up the GHCC loop, what looks like NW inflow just to the west of the new convective burst. What likely has happened is that the LLC reformed underneath the convection and is probably located just on the west edge of it. The low-level cloud pattern suggests that the west side of the circulation is elongated from west to east. Obviously we won't know for sure until the recon gets there.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:I may need to get off this site for a few hours. I am seeing too much crazy talk all of the sudden.I am amazed by how people cling onto these models (which have been performing poorly) as if they were gods. One run of the GFS (that is much different than the previous run) is not going to be the answer to anything.
What are you suggesting that we ignore all the tools given to us to predict what/when/where???
The models shift because variables and conditions are CONSTANTLY changing. I dont recall anyone saying the models were going to nail it and had a history of nailing things down. NO ONE SAID THAT!
0 likes
- KFDM Meteorologist
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
- Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County
If you look at the Initinal and 6 hour GFS it has picked it up.skysummit wrote:Steve wrote:>>From my experience the last 2 years the GFS hasn't done bad once it picks a system up.
But it's been handling handoffs awfully beyond 72 hours. We'll have to see how this plays out IMHO.
Steve
Right. It's been handling well once it's picked storms up, but I don't believe it's picked it up yet. What makes you think the GFS has now picked up on Ernesto?
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23692
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
KFDM Meteorologist wrote:If you look at the Initinal and 6 hour GFS it has picked it up.skysummit wrote:Steve wrote:>>From my experience the last 2 years the GFS hasn't done bad once it picks a system up.
But it's been handling handoffs awfully beyond 72 hours. We'll have to see how this plays out IMHO.
Steve
Right. It's been handling well once it's picked storms up, but I don't believe it's picked it up yet. What makes you think the GFS has now picked up on Ernesto?
Wow I hope it shifts back the other way....the fact that it is even thinking about a Charley-like path now has me nervous.
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5
- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
curtadams wrote:x-y-no wrote:jason0509 wrote:CNN's met Bonnie Schenider just said shear is tearing apart the storm. Just FYI.
But ... but ... but ... all evening long last night the "meteorologist" CNN kept going to (thankfully for him I don't recall his name) kept saying Ernesto was heading into an "extremely low-shear environment."![]()
Actually, you could parse that earlier statement as saying Ernesto would be in a low-shear environment once it's past Jamaica. Quite reasonable. Spoken language is rarely as precise as written.
It's very kind of you to wish to interpret his words to best effect, but itwas very clear he was talking about the coming day. He went on to talk about how Ernesto was forcast to "rapidly strengthen" as he approached Jamaica. Weirdly, he actually got the forecast intensities correct - so how he could reconcile that with a forecast of rapid strengthening is beyond me.
It wasn't until almost a full minute later (an eternity in TV time) that he got to talking about Ernesto's future in the Gulf.
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
thank you! That is one of the best posts I have heard all day. People are focusing too much on each new run of these poorly-performing models instead of looking at the overall trends and watching what is going on ATM. Tons can change with this strange situation over the next few days...I am sure the models will shift to FL, to TX, to LA and then back again, but they probably won't have a really good idea until Monday.Bailey1777 wrote:Guys I would give it until Monday to believe the model plots are even close and just focus on what the storm is doing right now. (Everything will change as it has done since this system became a T.D.)
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
well the best tool is probably the trained minds of those down at the NHC, so no do not stop listening to them. As for the models though, yes..I would ignore the models that are, and have been, poorly handling this system. They can't be right if they don't even initialize the system in the right position and at the right strength.6SpeedTA95 wrote:Extremeweatherguy wrote:I may need to get off this site for a few hours. I am seeing too much crazy talk all of the sudden.I am amazed by how people cling onto these models (which have been performing poorly) as if they were gods. One run of the GFS (that is much different than the previous run) is not going to be the answer to anything.
What are you suggesting that we ignore all the tools given to us to predict what/when/where???
The models shift because variables and conditions are CONSTANTLY changing. I dont recall anyone saying the models were going to nail it and had a history of nailing things down. NO ONE SAID THAT!
Wait until Monday before really buying into the models. There is still a large spread right now.
0 likes
Extremeweatherguy wrote:I may need to get off this site for a few hours. I am seeing too much crazy talk all of the sudden.I am amazed by how people cling onto these models (which have been performing poorly) as if they were gods. One run of the GFS (that is much different than the previous run) is not going to be the answer to anything.
Bwahahaha...Thanks for that chuckle.

The trend has definitely been to the east over the last 36 hours...There is no other way to slice it...36 hours ago no one was seriously even considering Florida to be under any type of threat...
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
- Location: Orange, California
- Contact:
skysummit wrote:Steve wrote:>>From my experience the last 2 years the GFS hasn't done bad once it picks a system up.
Right. It's been handling well once it's picked storms up, but I don't believe it's picked it up yet. What makes you think the GFS has now picked up on Ernesto?
I'm pretty sure it hasn't. That posted run never has Ernesto stronger than a tropical *LOW*. Not even TD-worthy.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7191
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:I may need to get off this site for a few hours. I am seeing too much crazy talk all of the sudden.I am amazed by how people cling onto these models (which have been performing poorly) as if they were gods. One run of the GFS (that is much different than the previous run) is not going to be the answer to anything.
ok, we will see you back in a few hours, have a good one.
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5196
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
I have a strong strong feeling they are getting a better read on this thing...remember how east they thought Rita was going and where it was targeted first? South of Corpus...kept moving models east, east east and east....
When more models are now starting to agree on certain things, I would be concerned for that area. I think La on east will be dealing with some crap this time next weekend.
When more models are now starting to agree on certain things, I would be concerned for that area. I think La on east will be dealing with some crap this time next weekend.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, gib, Killjoy12, Pas_Bon, Ulf and 34 guests