
-justin-
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Rod Hagen wrote:Mmm. Just by the way, why does the US regard a piddling one minute average speed puff as a "sustained" wind, when the rest of the world calls anything under 10 minutes sustained a "gust"?
Anyone have the world recognised 10 minutes sustained figures for recent US cyclones? (er , sorry, typhoons, er, hurricanes?)
Rod Hagen wrote:Its a funny game, this. "Ours are bigger than yours" and vice versa, seems to all too often be the essence of it, despite very dubious calculation processes.
Cheers
Rod
HurricaneBill wrote:Well, here's a question that doesn't involve scales.
I notice that many intense cyclones tend to rev up in intensity or maintain a strong intensity before landfalling on western Australia.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a large portion of western Australia a desert? If so, wouldn't that mean dry air would get sucked into the storm like in the Gulf of Mexico?
Ian wrote:Yes, the majority of WA is plain, flat desert. I really don't know, but I know quite a few cyclones that have survived for a long time in the desert regions. Cyclone George survived in the inland Pilbara for quite a long time. Much of the region is really dry.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Stratton23 and 63 guests