TS Irene=Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
WindRunner wrote:clfenwi wrote:
And I don't say that they are. Just that if your best sat analyzer takes the weekends off, then the data you use from sats will not have been analyzed as well and your forecasts will not be as hi-qual as they could have been.
That's not the way it works. Sometimes your best analyzer is on the swing shift during the weekend and is gone on Monday.
Weather shops are not set up like you guys think. You never know when the really good ones are working...but chances are they are not the ones on Monday morning...they could just as easily be the guy or gal working the saturday night mid shift. Most weather work is shift work...rotating shifts.
0 likes
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 42
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
Elysium also needs to remember to post the disclaimer. We don't want someone taking those posts as official info.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Windrunner,
will you please listen to what some of the other mets are saying?
1. Obs are not inputted by humans. To say that the models aren't of as high a quality is rediculous, especially after other mets have said as such
2. The best workers likely are working now. This is not a 9-5 job. To say that the best are not working is also wrong
3. Upper air model forecasts over the Atlantic are always garbage as there is never any good data that goes into the models, except for a G-IV flight
will you please listen to what some of the other mets are saying?
1. Obs are not inputted by humans. To say that the models aren't of as high a quality is rediculous, especially after other mets have said as such
2. The best workers likely are working now. This is not a 9-5 job. To say that the best are not working is also wrong
3. Upper air model forecasts over the Atlantic are always garbage as there is never any good data that goes into the models, except for a G-IV flight
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145934
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Elysium Please post a disclaimer before you do a forecast and also if you do a forecast bring scientific data that can sustent what you are saying.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
WindRunner wrote:And I don't say that they are. Just that if your best sat analyzer takes the weekends off, then the data you use from sats will not have been analyzed as well and your forecasts will not be as hi-qual as they could have been.
Okay... I've gotta step in here...
To say that the best forecasters or satellite analyzers have the weekends off is bogus. As a professional met myself, I can assure you that the "best forecasters" aren't scheduled any particular shift, especially a day job.
On the majority, and including the NHC and NWS, meteorologists are shift workers. Some days they are working a day shift... some days they are working a swing (evening)... some days they are working a mid (overnight). The life of a meteorologist knows no normal life. We're always rotating.
As AFM said, you never know what given forecaster is working and their specific strengths or weaknesses.
The forecasters' shifts are pretty much at chance... they don't specifically schedule the better forecasters during the week. These same great forecasters are the same people who are leaving their own families during Christmas dinner just to make sure the job/mission is completed.
As for the "normal day forecasters"... there aren't any. "Day-weenies," as they are affectionately referred to, are staff people... the managers. They have no hand at what's being forecasted... they just care that it's forecasted and it's done well. It's not the managers' job to second-guess their forecasters thoughts.
As for the NHC not being about to coordinate with NWS during the weekends... I wouldn't call it coordination. The NHC has the role of forecasting all cyclones in the Atlantic basin, as directed by the WMO. The NWS listens to what the NHC has to say. There really is no coordinating, unless it involves foreign nations.
As for model data... there isn't a difference between a Wednesday or a Sunday. It's all computerized.
0 likes
Actually, the NHC and the NWS should be fully staffed every weekend hereafter assuming a busy season. This weekend is unique because it is offering perhaps the only weekend off that many of the staff will be seeing until possibly late October. There is normally a full crew during the season's peek, but that's why we have a skeleton crew now. That's common.
But something here is going on now that also hasn't been addressed due to the above; the main LLC may not be the one to the northwest of the convection. It appears as though the center is relocating to the south while the center to the northwest opens and dissipates. No big deal but this is another item that would have almost surely been addressed had this been Monday. The important issue, however, concerning recurvature vs. a sharp turn to the west, is also not being discussed in detail. I am a little stumped about why the NHC is forecasting a weakening ridge. That's like 7 days out on some of the models from the 5th. Just look at the ridge over Irene this hour and powerfully pushing in from behind. Look at Harvey accerate to it. The only thing that I can think of here is that it is so obvious that the weakness is rapidly accelerating and will not be there in time to pick up Irene that someone is assuming that a weak ridge itself must therefore be the culprit behind the recurvature. But there is no weakness in that ridge.
Anyway, what will be addressed Monday will be the relocation of the center to the south. That's where it should all start.
But something here is going on now that also hasn't been addressed due to the above; the main LLC may not be the one to the northwest of the convection. It appears as though the center is relocating to the south while the center to the northwest opens and dissipates. No big deal but this is another item that would have almost surely been addressed had this been Monday. The important issue, however, concerning recurvature vs. a sharp turn to the west, is also not being discussed in detail. I am a little stumped about why the NHC is forecasting a weakening ridge. That's like 7 days out on some of the models from the 5th. Just look at the ridge over Irene this hour and powerfully pushing in from behind. Look at Harvey accerate to it. The only thing that I can think of here is that it is so obvious that the weakness is rapidly accelerating and will not be there in time to pick up Irene that someone is assuming that a weak ridge itself must therefore be the culprit behind the recurvature. But there is no weakness in that ridge.
Anyway, what will be addressed Monday will be the relocation of the center to the south. That's where it should all start.
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
elysium wrote:Actually, the NHC and the NWS should be fully staffed every weekend hereafter assuming a busy season. This weekend is unique because it is offering perhaps the only weekend off that many of the staff will be seeing until possibly late October. There is normally a full crew during the season's peek, but that's why we have a skeleton crew now. That's common.
I don't think you've grasped the aforementioned comments. The NHC and NWS is not under a skeleton crew. Now... if you are referring to the fact that the staff is not at work this weekend... that is to be expected. There really isn't a reason for them to be there unless a storm is making landfall to the US.
Rest assured... the NHC is staffed well enough to accomplish the mission at hand and therefore do not need additional manpower.
The more people on shift now... the more hectic it will be. Remember... too many chefs spoil the broth.
0 likes
As I've been saying, the convection with the old MLC continues to fade out while new convection fires up on the western side of the LLC that is well to the northwest of the old MLC.
I don't see any LLC associated with the MLC that was sheared off. I think what people are seeing as an LLC associated with the old MLC is actually the 'tail' from the LLC proper (south-north circulation) below the MLC (which is spinning, creating the illusion of a surface LLC).
I don't see any LLC associated with the MLC that was sheared off. I think what people are seeing as an LLC associated with the old MLC is actually the 'tail' from the LLC proper (south-north circulation) below the MLC (which is spinning, creating the illusion of a surface LLC).
0 likes
Well, I can't really can't tell which one is the dominant center here. For what ever reason, we will have to wait until tomorrow before hearing a detailed analysis on what exactly is going on. Unfortunately, I am lacking the necessary meteorological scientific instrumentation to give a complete rendition of the immediate foregoing and current synopsis of Irene. I can guess and say that the LLC to the northwest will dissipate due to lack of convection. It appears as though the southern LLC is stripping its northern counterpart. But i don't know. If I could do a drop (lol) you could take my gut instinct here to the bank. We have to wait until Moday, but that's what it looks like is happening.
By the way, this could be important. Can't say.
By the way, this could be important. Can't say.
0 likes
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
Derek Ortt wrote:Windrunner,
will you please listen to what some of the other mets are saying?
1. Obs are not inputted by humans. To say that the models aren't of as high a quality is rediculous, especially after other mets have said as such
2. The best workers likely are working now. This is not a 9-5 job. To say that the best are not working is also wrong
3. Upper air model forecasts over the Atlantic are always garbage as there is never any good data that goes into the models, except for a G-IV flight
I understand what everyone has been saying, I'm just explaining how elysium was thinking when she made her post.
0 likes
- Astro_man92
- Category 5
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
- Contact:
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
clfenwi wrote:As I've been saying, the convection with the old MLC continues to fade out while new convection fires up on the western side of the LLC that is well to the northwest of the old MLC.
I don't see any LLC associated with the MLC that was sheared off. I think what people are seeing as an LLC associated with the old MLC is actually the 'tail' from the LLC proper (south-north circulation) below the MLC (which is spinning, creating the illusion of a surface LLC).
Exactly. There is no low level spin to the southeast of the LLC. The LLC is too tightly wrapped to allow for another LLC to form to the SE. The low level flow is too strong to allow that to happen. This feature will die over the next 12-18 hours. The current LLC is too wound up to allow for any competition around it...especially given the convection is not that deep and begining to wain some.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, Google Adsense [Bot], lolitx, Sunnydays, WeatherCat and 49 guests