TS Ernesto: Sat Pics, Models, Analysis Thread XI (#11)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1894
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

#161 Postby AtlanticWind » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:28 pm

While everybodys looking at models take a look at a loop , either the storm is getting sheared or there is quite a bit of a northerly componet.
0 likes   

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

#162 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:29 pm

mvtrucking wrote:
gopherfan21 wrote:For the last time, ARE YOU PEOPLE NOT LISTENING TO THE PRO METS!?!?!?!?!?!?

The GFS is WRONG

It has used Incorrect Initializations and is basically plowing Ernesto through a ridge!


I am curious if that is still their opinion's? They have been quiet the last
many pages. I really would like to get their ideas right about now..


By the way, the 18z UKMET has the system tightly under the cuban coast, really only about 75 miles south of the GFS solution. Even the official NHC position at 72 hours is only 125 miles off the GFS. I really don't see why people think this is such a radical model right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4008
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#163 Postby AJC3 » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:30 pm

mvtrucking wrote:
gopherfan21 wrote:For the last time, ARE YOU PEOPLE NOT LISTENING TO THE PRO METS!?!?!?!?!?!?

The GFS is WRONG

It has used Incorrect Initializations and is basically plowing Ernesto through a ridge!


I am curious if that is still their opinion's? They have been quiet the last
many pages. I really would like to get their ideas right about now..


I don't think the 12Z GFS solution of the center moving NNW over eastern Cuba will verify, hence I see the threat of potential effects to peninsular south FL as minimal right now. Of course, that doesn't mean anyone in south FL should cease to keep track of the system.

While still several days away, the consensus of a northward turn into the eastern GOMEX landfall looks reasonable. Still a long way off though.
Last edited by AJC3 on Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

#164 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:30 pm

AtlanticWind wrote:While everybodys looking at models take a look at a loop , either the storm is getting sheared or there is quite a bit of a northerly componet.


Extremely astute observation.
0 likes   

Furious George
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:03 pm

#165 Postby Furious George » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:30 pm

As models trend east (and I somewhat suspect another slightly eastern shift by the NHC at 11 pm), it looks like the track may really spend some time along Cuba. Look at the 3 day cone. If it rides the northern section it could spend upwards of 1 day over Cuba. Probably not enough to kill it, but any thoughts on how fast it could re-intensify over the GOM? Looking at SST's and heat content, I'd say pretty fast.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphic ... shtml?5day
Last edited by Furious George on Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#166 Postby Bailey1777 » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:30 pm

A ridge, is a ridge, is a ridge.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#167 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:31 pm

gatorcane wrote:wow new GFS just off Tampa!!!!

Unbelievable folks....I love the tropics they are so suspenseful!!!



well having it be off of the Tampa coast is much better than it plowing into Tampa anyway, so that's good news.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4008
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#168 Postby AJC3 » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:32 pm

CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
mvtrucking wrote:
gopherfan21 wrote:For the last time, ARE YOU PEOPLE NOT LISTENING TO THE PRO METS!?!?!?!?!?!?

The GFS is WRONG

It has used Incorrect Initializations and is basically plowing Ernesto through a ridge!


I am curious if that is still their opinion's? They have been quiet the last
many pages. I really would like to get their ideas right about now..


By the way, the 18z UKMET has the system tightly under the cuban coast, really only about 75 miles south of the GFS solution. Even the official NHC position at 72 hours is only 125 miles off the GFS. I really don't see why people think this is such a radical model right now.



I don't think the 12Z GFS was "radical". It simply made a change and became a right outlier with IMO little chance of verifying within the first 60 hours. UKMET looks pretty reasonable to me.
0 likes   

User avatar
canetracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 751
Age: 62
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA

#169 Postby canetracker » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:32 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:
Brent wrote:
SouthFloridawx wrote:
gopherfan21 wrote:For the last time, ARE YOU PEOPLE NOT LISTENING TO THE PRO METS!?!?!?!?!?!?

The GFS is WRONG

It has used Incorrect Initializations and is basically plowing Ernesto through a ridge!


I read absolutely nothing in the NHC discussion where they said they were discounting the gfs.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MI ... 2105.shtml


Well to be fair:

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE GFS SOLUTION OF
BRINGING THE LOW-LEVEL CENTER OF ERNESTO TO SOUTH FLORIDA LOOKS
DUBIOUS...AS THE 500 MB CENTER STAYS WELL TO THE SOUTH OVER CUBA.

That doesn't make sense and won't happen.

Well that would indicate that the low level and mid level circulation will decouple. However they did NOT say they were toally discounting the GFS.


By mentioning the word dubious (of doubtful promise or outcome; questionable or suspect as to true nature or quality .....source Meriam Webster Dictionary) I think they meant that they are discounting the GFS.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#170 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:33 pm

Scorpion wrote:Looks like a Panhandle to Big Bend hit to me, for now. It's within driving range, so I might chase it.


:lol: :lol: that sounds like fun...I chased a few tornados when I lived in Kansas, what a rush that was...
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#171 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:34 pm

It still amazes me when people buy into a model (the GFS) when it initializes the system as a 1008mb low! That is nearly 11mb stronger than it actually is. I think the reason we are seeing another crazy path this time is because this is an 18Z run (based off the 12Z)...I will be much more interested in what the 0Z guidance has to say.
0 likes   

User avatar
BonesXL
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Homestead, Florida
Contact:

#172 Postby BonesXL » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:34 pm

well having it be off of the Tampa coast is much better than it plowing into Tampa anyway, so that's good news.


Wow..I agree with u your so awesome and caring your the very best man...you are tops in my book... :lol: :lol:
Last edited by BonesXL on Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#173 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:34 pm

AJC3 wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
mvtrucking wrote:
gopherfan21 wrote:For the last time, ARE YOU PEOPLE NOT LISTENING TO THE PRO METS!?!?!?!?!?!?

The GFS is WRONG

It has used Incorrect Initializations and is basically plowing Ernesto through a ridge!


I am curious if that is still their opinion's? They have been quiet the last
many pages. I really would like to get their ideas right about now..


By the way, the 18z UKMET has the system tightly under the cuban coast, really only about 75 miles south of the GFS solution. Even the official NHC position at 72 hours is only 125 miles off the GFS. I really don't see why people think this is such a radical model right now.



I don't think the 12Z GFS was "radical". It simply made a change and became a right outlier with IMO little chance of verifying within the first 60 hours. UKMET looks pretty reasonable to me.


Does the UKMET have a new solution now? Where is it now predicting landfall?
0 likes   

Scorpion

#174 Postby Scorpion » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:35 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:It still amazes me when people buy into a model (the GFS) when it initializes the system as a 1008mb low! That is nearly 11mb stronger than it actually is. I think the reason we are seeing another crazy path this time is because this is an 18Z run (based off the 12Z)...I will be much more interested in what the 0Z guidance has to say.


The GFS always will initialize much higher than the actual pressure. I would think the GFS is actually pretty close here with its current intensity.
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#175 Postby Bailey1777 » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:36 pm

AJC3 using your pro eyes what direction is E. moving right now?
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4008
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#176 Postby AJC3 » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:36 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
AJC3 wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
mvtrucking wrote:
gopherfan21 wrote:For the last time, ARE YOU PEOPLE NOT LISTENING TO THE PRO METS!?!?!?!?!?!?

The GFS is WRONG

It has used Incorrect Initializations and is basically plowing Ernesto through a ridge!


I am curious if that is still their opinion's? They have been quiet the last
many pages. I really would like to get their ideas right about now..


By the way, the 18z UKMET has the system tightly under the cuban coast, really only about 75 miles south of the GFS solution. Even the official NHC position at 72 hours is only 125 miles off the GFS. I really don't see why people think this is such a radical model right now.



I don't think the 12Z GFS was "radical". It simply made a change and became a right outlier with IMO little chance of verifying within the first 60 hours. UKMET looks pretty reasonable to me.


Does the UKMET have a new solution now? Where is it now predicting landfall?


Dunno, but the idea of a close pass underneath Cuba is what looks reasonable to me. I've been trying to focus on what I think will happen in the next 2-3 days.
0 likes   

Opal storm

#177 Postby Opal storm » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:36 pm

Have you guys even looked at the NHC cone,it extends all the way to western LA.Why are so many people sold on a FL landfall?
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#178 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:37 pm

Noles2006 wrote:Stratosphere -- sorry, didn't mean to offend you... however, I was just saying that if Convergence could make that conclusion about Floridians, then I could do the same about Texans... see, there's only one or two Floridians that are "hyping" a Florida hit.



I didn't mean that in a bad way. I"m just saying that it's easy to have a bias if you live in a specific area, only because you focus on the model depicting it coming your way moreso than the models that say it's not going to come your way. ..
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#179 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:37 pm

Opal storm wrote:Have you guys even looked at the NHC cone,it extends all the way to western LA.Why are so many people sold on a FL landfall?
and if their cone was extended further, then it would likely go further west than that. This is still anyones ball game IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#180 Postby storms in NC » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:38 pm

Bailey1777 wrote:AJC3 using your pro eyes what direction is E. moving right now?


LOL I had to read it 4 times before I know what E was for Ernesto. was thing East LOLOLOL So sorryhad to laugh
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 40 guests