StormClouds63 wrote:On this discussion of El Nino and less active seasons in the Atlantic Basin...
Is it then accurate to state that more active years in the Eastern Pacific usually mean fewer storms in the Atlantic (and vice versa)?
Eastern Pacific: http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/e_p ... index.html (1951-2008)
Atlantic Basin: http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atlantic/index.html (1851-2009)
I know some years it doesn't work out this way ... looks like 2005, for example, was active in both basins (15 Easter Pacific/28 Atlantic), while other seasons, such as 1977, have been relatively quiet in both basins (8 Eastern Pacific/7 Atlantic). In tropical seasons such as 1977, what would account for less activity in both basins? Water temperature? Shear? Natural climate cycle?
I know '77 did have Anita, a very powerful Cat 4 in the southern Gulf. Here in Louisiana we experienced Babe, a relatively weak tropical system that barely reached hurricane status.
1977 is an interesting one. It is not really known why it was inactive for both East Pacific and Atlantic. Even West Pacific was less active. I know the winter of 1976-77 was El Nino, but a weak one. It was the time that Miami saw snow. Also, it went El Nino in late 1977, which was weak too. Also, for the Atlantic we were in a cooler phase. The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) went into a warm phase in 1977.