CSU (Klotzbach/Gray) Update

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#21 Postby KWT » Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:38 am

Yeah I think the pattern probably will be replaced, its not really a typical La Nina pattern.

Typically La Ninas tend to be Caribbean/E.coast usually and from what I'm seeing I suspect this will be the case this year as well, there is a fairly decent weaknesses out there (just look at Colin now) but I think thats going to be more of a September track.

I bet we get a big un in the Caribbean in the next month FWIW, La Ninas tend to get cat-4/5s into CA most seasons.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: DR. GREY UPDATE

#22 Postby hurricaneCW » Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:39 am

Very impressive convective activity in the eastern Atlantic. If anything it should sweep up some of that dry air. Something big might even form out of it.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/tatl/flash-rb.html
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re:

#23 Postby abajan » Wed Aug 04, 2010 12:04 pm

HURAKAN wrote:15 more storms is doable to get to 18. For example, 3 more in August, 6 in September, 5 in October, and 1 in November.

I think the season will be active in the late months.
I actually expect 1 or even 2 out of season systems in December. Time will tell, of course.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: DR. GREY UPDATE

#24 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 04, 2010 12:27 pm

Just to be clear...

Note that they aren't 'seeing' anything, they are using statistical data and indicators to predict storm numbers. If their indicators are not enough to capture the true potential of the season then the forecast will bust. :)
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: DR. GREY UPDATE

#25 Postby thetruesms » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:14 pm

tolakram wrote:Just to be clear...

Note that they aren't 'seeing' anything, they are using statistical data and indicators to predict storm numbers. If their indicators are not enough to capture the true potential of the season then the forecast will bust. :)
Indeed - they actually have two schemes - one statistical, using SSTs, SLP, ENSO, and storms to date; also, they have an analog method. It appears that their final numbers are very heavily weighted to the analog method (read: essentially ignores the statistical method). They don't really explain why this is so, perhaps it has something to do with the fact that they are apparently using a new statistical scheme? Anyway, I'd recommend to anyone reading their full document to learn more about how they create their forecast: http://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/for ... ug2010.pdf. It's a technical document, but I think it's actually pretty accessible, at least compared to other things I've read.

Also, I think it's about time we recognize Dr. Klotzbach for the work he does. He's been the first author on these for four years now - this is now more his project than Dr. Gray's.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: Dr. Gray Update

#26 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:21 pm

Wow..am I reading it right they didn't lower their numbers? That speaks volumes to what is ahead imo
0 likes   
Michael

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#27 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:40 pm

The title should be Dr. Klotzbach update.
0 likes   

supercane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2858
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:27 pm

Re: DR. GREY UPDATE

#28 Postby supercane » Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:22 pm

thetruesms wrote:
tolakram wrote:Just to be clear...

Note that they aren't 'seeing' anything, they are using statistical data and indicators to predict storm numbers. If their indicators are not enough to capture the true potential of the season then the forecast will bust. :)
Indeed - they actually have two schemes - one statistical, using SSTs, SLP, ENSO, and storms to date; also, they have an analog method. It appears that their final numbers are very heavily weighted to the analog method (read: essentially ignores the statistical method). They don't really explain why this is so, perhaps it has something to do with the fact that they are apparently using a new statistical scheme? Anyway, I'd recommend to anyone reading their full document to learn more about how they create their forecast: http://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/for ... ug2010.pdf. It's a technical document, but I think it's actually pretty accessible, at least compared to other things I've read.

Also, I think it's about time we recognize Dr. Klotzbach for the work he does. He's been the first author on these for four years now - this is now more his project than Dr. Gray's.


Their ultimate forecast has almost always seemed to lean toward the analog method compared to the statistical method. It's just that some years, the numbers are closer.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#29 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:47 pm

HURAKAN wrote:15 more storms is doable to get to 18. For example, 3 more in August, 6 in September, 5 in October, and 1 in November.

I think the season will be active in the late months.


That was on August 4. We got 4 storms in August, so far 6 in September and likely 7 or 8 before the month ends. October should also be active. So 18 storms doesn't seem that out of the reach anymore!!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: caneman, Sciencerocks, Steve H. and 30 guests