Hurricane Andrew wrote:Gray/Klotzbach, are they with CSU?
Yes, but it's mostly Phil Klotzbach doing the work now.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Hurricane Andrew wrote:wxman, off topic, but when looking at the CFSv2, is it best to use E3 or E1, or E2?
wxman57 wrote:I was talking to Phil about the outlook last week at the NHC. All signals point to diminished activity vs. the past two seasons. Though I didn't see his numbers, I did see that he was thinking 1957 and 1965 were the best analogs, as well as 2001 and 2009. We discussed whether it was possible to ever have less than 10 named storms again based on current detection techniques and naming conventions. I think he'll say either 9 or 10 named storms, 5 hurricanes and 2 majors. I think he was leaning toward 1 major but may start out with 2. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the season is sub-10.
Reasons:
Trend toward El Nino (European is most bullish on El Nino developing over the summer)
Predicted much higher pressures across the Tropical Atlantic this year vs. past 2 years (Euro)
Predicted cooler AMO. Stronger Bermuda high means stronger easterly trades and more upwelling of cool water in the MDR
Note that I'm not talking about seasonal "severity", only seasonal numbers. 1957 and 1965 are the best analogs, and both were seasons of 8 or fewer named storms. However 1957 featured Hurricane Audrey and 1965 featured Betsy. A "quiet" season like either of those two would be quite severe compared to 2010 & 2011.
hurricanetrack wrote:Cooler SSTs in the MDR? Not too bad looking to me and quite bit warmer than a month ago:
March:
http://www.osdpd.noaa.gov/data/sst/anom ... 1.2012.gif
Now:
http://www.osdpd.noaa.gov/data/sst/anom ... 2.2012.gif
cycloneye wrote:I suspect that the other agencies and private firms such as TSR,Accuweather and NOAA, that do Hurricane Season seasonal forecasting will go the same route that CSU did.
Users browsing this forum: cheezyWXguy and 38 guests