steveklein wrote:Josephine96 wrote:"escaped the big one".. Sounds like someone's in denial.. I wouldn't go as far as escaping the big 1..
Just because she made landfall at 150 instead of 175.. doesn't mean New Orleans escaped..
Although I will say.. that because New Orleans is not directly on the water.. It could have been a whole lot worse.. I haven't seen any damage photos though so I don't know..
goodness guys. can you guys not understand what the original poster was saying? they did escape the big one.
1) the hurricane made landfall with winds of 140 or 145, not 150.
2) the eastern side of the city had a glancing blow from the western eyewall when the storm had diminished down to 130 or 135 mph.
if this thing had moved 20 miles to the west as a true cat 5, new orleans would have been destroyed. instead, it just sustained minor to moderate damage. some parts of the city resemble a direct hit from a cat 1, others resemble a direct hit from a cat 2.
Exactly Steve. The horrific images I had painted in my mind by the media yesterday, is not what I"m seeing and hearing about today. Perhaps they have yet to mention the worst that's happened. I'll just have to wait and see.






