HURAKAN wrote:The NHC agrees, their futuristic maps show a low developing in the area.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb-atl.shtml
That is for 92L as the latitud is above 30n.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
HURAKAN wrote:The NHC agrees, their futuristic maps show a low developing in the area.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb-atl.shtml
cycloneye wrote:HURAKAN wrote:The NHC agrees, their futuristic maps show a low developing in the area.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb-atl.shtml
That is for 92L as the latitud is above 30n.
HURAKAN wrote:cycloneye wrote:HURAKAN wrote:The NHC agrees, their futuristic maps show a low developing in the area.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb-atl.shtml
That is for 92L as the latitud is above 30n.
Luis, si miras el mapa de las próximas 24 horas verás una baja presión cerca de 24N 61O, estas coordinadas no corresponden a 92L.
Luis, if you look at the 24 hrs map, there is a low located at 24N 61W, not the coordinates of 92L.
boca wrote:Hello Boca_chris the area north of PR has to head WNW since the bermuda high should be building back in according ti NWS Miami.