LOL,that's what I heard with 91L then 93L and then 94L,so far no Beryl yet.fasterdisaster wrote:I think this will be our Beryl

Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:Anyone has an archieve on how 2005 was in terms of the number of invests vs 2006 around the end of June?
CHRISTY wrote:cycloneye wrote:Christy,why those emoctions?
cause the NHC and my local news were sayin no development from none of the 2 systems.and then BOOM!95L
clfenwi wrote:cycloneye wrote:Anyone has an archieve on how 2005 was in terms of the number of invests vs 2006 around the end of June?
A few nights ago I was looking at that... The first Invest 95 last year was what became Bret...96 was classified on July 2 and became Cindy... and 97 was classified on July 4 and became Dennis.
skysummit wrote:Local Met on Fox8 just said no concerns for 95L. It'll just move northward and shouldn've affect anyone.
skysummit wrote:Local Met on Fox8 just said no concerns for 95L. It'll just move northward and shouldn've affect anyone.
ronjon wrote:skysummit wrote:Local Met on Fox8 just said no concerns for 95L. It'll just move northward and shouldn've affect anyone.
Hmmm....and move northward into the heart of a 1024-1028 mb ridge. Doesn't seem likely to me.![]()
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb_latest/atl ... BW_sm3.gif
ronjon wrote:Wow, 1009 mb already. Seems like the NHC should start thinking about a RECON mission soon. The ULL west of Haiti which was shearing the system intially now appears to be aiding outflow as an anti-cyclone has built over the top of the system. I don't see shear as being a problem with the system now. If you want to see shear, just look to the eastern GOM.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/watl/loop-wv.html
caneman wrote:ronjon wrote:Wow, 1009 mb already. Seems like the NHC should start thinking about a RECON mission soon. The ULL west of Haiti which was shearing the system intially now appears to be aiding outflow as an anti-cyclone has built over the top of the system. I don't see shear as being a problem with the system now. If you want to see shear, just look to the eastern GOM.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/watl/loop-wv.html
Agreed and well said. Been reading the naysayers posts all day. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that it looked like it was developing and coming together and with a ridge building down.Really would like to see the pros get more into the potential set up etc...rather than just discount everything.
Users browsing this forum: Beef Stew, Lizzytiz1, Orlando_wx and 48 guests