lsuhurricane wrote:Might be time to put the GFS out to pasture after this lack of consistency
Its the same as 18Z but just slower
Moderator: S2k Moderators
lsuhurricane wrote:Might be time to put the GFS out to pasture after this lack of consistency
Yea at 150h it looks just like 18ZKeldeo1997 wrote:lsuhurricane wrote:Might be time to put the GFS out to pasture after this lack of consistency
Its the same as 18Z but just slower
SoupBone wrote:Now it's stuck on the east side of Florida. Getting trapped by a high?
skyline385 wrote:SoupBone wrote:Now it's stuck on the east side of Florida. Getting trapped by a high?
What a mess of a run lol
lsuhurricane wrote:GFS ensembles are still very active and a few are stronger in the short term
LarryWx wrote:
The good news (or more accurately the not as bad news) IF that highly unlikely scenario were to occur is that the storm would NOT strengthen from 984 mb at Jupiter inlet to 969 mb just off Brunswick when skirting the coast like that. The GFS is clearly exhibiting an overstrengthening bias considering it is barely offshore, which means much of the storm is inland. Not realistic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 185 guests