2005 Atl Reports=Unnamed Subtropical Storm Report Posted

[cycloneye]

Tropical Storm Arlene= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ms-word/TCR-AL012005_Arlene.doc

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL012005_Arlene.pdf


Tropical Storm Bret

Tropical Storm Cindy

Hurricane Dennis= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ms-word/TCR-AL042005_Dennis.doc

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL042005_Dennis.pdf


Hurricane Emily

Tropical Storm Franklin

Tropical Storm Gert= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ms-word/TCR-AL072005_Gert.doc

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL072005_Gert.pdf


Tropical Storm Harvey

Hurricane Irene

Tropical Depression Ten

Tropical Storm Jose

Hurricane Katrina= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122005_Katrina.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ms-word/TCR-AL1 ... atrina.doc


Tropical Storm Lee = http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ms-word/TCR-AL132005_Lee.doc

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL132005_Lee.pdf


Hurricane Maria

Hurricane Nate

Hurricane Ophelia

Hurricane Philippe

Hurricane Rita

Tropical Depression Nineteen

Hurricane Stan

Tropical Storm Tammy

Sub-Tropical Depression Twenty-Two

Hurricane Vince

Hurricane Wilma

Tropical Storm Alpha

Hurricane Beta

Tropical Storm Gamma

Tropical Storm Delta

Hurricane Epsilon= http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL292005_Epsilon.pdf

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ms-word/TCR-AL2 ... psilon.doc

Tropical Storm Zeta


New page and a new storm added Zeta.6 reports are posted with 24 left.

[wxwatcher91]

I said "Wilma didnt strike the US as hard as Katrina did"

I didnt say Wilma did not strike the US hard.

Oh... sorry!

no problem

Im curious to see what they have to say about max sus winds for Wilma during her peak...

she bottomed out at 882 and I would think winds would be higher than 175
I know she was in an area of lower pressure so the pressure gradient would be as significant but still...... just seem a bit low for 882

[MiamiensisWx]

no problem

Im curious to see what they have to say about max sus winds for Wilma during her peak...

she bottomed out at 882 and I would think winds would be higher than 175
I know she was in an area of lower pressure so the pressure gradient would be as significant but still...... just seem a bit low for 882

Yep... I am interested as well!

It will also be interesting if they boost Wilma's intensity of 110KT (125MPH) at Florida landfall upward to a borderline Category Three/Category Four or to a Category Four.

[WindRunner]

I said "Wilma didnt strike the US as hard as Katrina did"

I didnt say Wilma did not strike the US hard.

Oh... sorry!

no problem

Im curious to see what they have to say about max sus winds for Wilma during her peak...

she bottomed out at 882 and I would think winds would be higher than 175
I know she was in an area of lower pressure so the pressure gradient would be as significant but still...... just seem a bit low for 882

They supposedly bumped her to 185, but that's not official yet.

[cycloneye]

We also have to up it to 24 reports left, don't forget. (Unless the NHC can somehow put out the post-storm analysis with the first adivisory )

Yes now 24 reports are now left and I say that the Zeta report will be the next one to be released as they did after Epsilon went away when a few days later that report was out.However I may be wrong as all thought that the Katrina report would be released in several months and to be one of the last ones but they surprised us all with that release at December 20.

[whereverwx]

They are going to have to update the Epsilon report now.... since it is no longer the last storm of the season.

Epsilon, the record-setting 26th and final named tropical cyclone of the 2005 hurricane season...

[WindRunner]

They're already getting to work on the Zeta report, already adding at least 5 hours to the system:

THE HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS THAT ALICE OFFICIALLY BECAME A TROPICAL
STORM AT 1200 UTC 30 DECEMBER 1954. MY WORKING BEST TRACK FOR ZETA
CURRENTLY SHOWS STORM STATUS BEGINNING AT 1200 UTC THIS MORNING...
WHICH TENTATIVELY ALLOWS ZETA TO TIE ALICE FOR THE LATEST FORMING
TROPICAL STORM IN THE ATLANTIC BASIN. HOWEVER...A CASE CAN BE MADE
FOR CONSIDERING ZETA A TROPICAL STORM AS EARLY AS 0600 UTC THIS
MORNING. WE'LL HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE FINAL ANALYSIS OF ZETA'S TRACK
TO SEE EXACTLY WHERE ITS FORMATION FALLS RELATIVE TO ALICE'S.

[MGC]

The far eastern sections of New Orleans near the Rigoettes are only five miles from the Peal River, the offical landfall site. Far eastern New Orleans was in the eye of Katrina and easily had Cat-2 winds. The area is nothing more than marsh with a built up strip for highway 90, thus there is little to stop the wind, just mostly water and a 1/4 mile wide strip of marsh. The offical New Orleans site in Kenner is a good 30 miles away. Sure, downtown may have had cat-1 but parts of the city had cat-2.....MGC

[Audrey2Katrina]

The far eastern sections of New Orleans near the Rigoettes are only five miles from the Peal River, the offical landfall site. Far eastern New Orleans was in the eye of Katrina and easily had Cat-2 winds. The area is nothing more than marsh with a built up strip for highway 90, thus there is little to stop the wind, just mostly water and a 1/4 mile wide strip of marsh. The offical New Orleans site in Kenner is a good 30 miles away. Sure, downtown may have had cat-1 but parts of the city had cat-2.....MGC

Hey, I won't argue with the majority of what you say; but the idea that the entire area out there is "nothing more than marsh" is inaccurate at best (unless by "far eastern sections" you mean within 3 miles or less of the Rigolets, which is I won't dispute.) It is sparsely populated; but there ARE people living (or they DID live) in subdivisions out there. You might want to check on streets like Trieste St., San Remo Rd., Genoa Rd, Alba Rd, San Marco Rd, Fort Macombe Road and Naples St. --all of these "residential" streets are about five miles tops from the actual Rigolets, and in fact, you'll even find some streets, like Hospital, Martin, Jacobs, Clinton, and Mayne St. within 1000 feet of the Rigolets, and even slightly further EAST than Slidell itself. All within the New Orleans City limits. Now I grant you these aren't sprawling towns; but they are real "streets" with houses on them.(well, they HAD houses on them).. more than just "marsh" And for that matter, if you go just about 5 to 6 miles SW of the 1-10 twin-spans you'll find Lake Forest Dr, and very LARGE subdivisions full of populated residential areas... all in New Orleans East, and if they're only 5-6 miles tops west of those Rigolets, then you had some populated residential area well within those winds of which you speak.

A2K

[Pearl River]

Audrey2Katrina said:

MGC wrote:
The far eastern sections of New Orleans near the Rigoettes are only five miles from the Peal River, the offical landfall site. Far eastern New Orleans was in the eye of Katrina and easily had Cat-2 winds. The area is nothing more than marsh with a built up strip for highway 90, thus there is little to stop the wind, just mostly water and a 1/4 mile wide strip of marsh. The offical New Orleans site in Kenner is a good 30 miles away. Sure, downtown may have had cat-1 but parts of the city had cat-2.....MGC


Hey, I won't argue with the majority of what you say; but the idea that the entire area out there is "nothing more than marsh" is inaccurate at best (unless by "far eastern sections" you mean within 3 miles or less of the Rigolets, which is I won't dispute.) It is sparsely populated; but there ARE people living (or they DID live) in subdivisions out there. You might want to check on streets like Trieste St., San Remo Rd., Genoa Rd, Alba Rd, San Marco Rd, Fort Macombe Road and Naples St. --all of these "residential" streets are about five miles tops from the actual Rigolets, and in fact, you'll even find some streets, like Hospital, Martin, Jacobs, Clinton, and Mayne St. within 1000 feet of the Rigolets, and even slightly further EAST than Slidell itself. All within the New Orleans City limits. Now I grant you these aren't sprawling towns; but they are real "streets" with houses on them.(well, they HAD houses on them).. more than just "marsh" And for that matter, if you go just about 5 to 6 miles SW of the 1-10 twin-spans you'll find Lake Forest Dr, and very LARGE subdivisions full of populated residential areas... all in New Orleans East, and if they're only 5-6 miles tops west of those Rigolets, then you had some populated residential area well within those winds of which you speak.

A2K

Both of you are correct and you don't have to go very far from Fort Pike and there are/were houses near there.

[Audrey2Katrina]

you don't have to go very far from Fort Pike and there are/were houses near there.

Exactly my point. I had friends, the Hucks, who used to have a home near the Fort Pike, Lake Catherine area, which is the reason I made the reply. A LOT of marshland indeed; but there were some homes... comparable to south of Venice in Plaquemines parish--lord I pity those poor folks, I spoke to a serviceman in my area who went down there and said there's just nothing--literally nothing left in those areas.

[Audrey2Katrina]

Still waitin on Cindy and Wilma reports tho'

[StormScanWx]

Still waitin on Cindy and Wilma reports tho'

Right now, I am VERY interested in seeing Cindy, Emily, and Wilma.

I want to see if Emily will be upgraded to a Category 5!

[cycloneye]

Still waitin on Cindy and Wilma reports tho'

Right now, I am VERY interested in seeing Cindy, Emily, and Wilma.

I want to see if Emily will be upgraded to a Category 5!

Let's see if starting this week some of the reports are released so stay tuned to this thread as you will know when a report is posted here rapidly as I edit the title of thread to announce a new report.There are 6 up and 24 left.

[Jim Cantore]

does the NHC try to go in any particular order releasing these reports?

[Scorpion]

does the NHC try to go in any particular order releasing these reports?

I doubt it, but I would think they should at least have the weak TS's done by now. But then again, with so many storms, theres got to be a backup.

[Audrey2Katrina]

Doesn't seem to have a pattern; but based on the relatively quick release of the Katrina report, perhaps it's based on impact when it's significant, otherwise, it should be order of occurance. If that is any indication, we could be waiting about 6 weeks for Wilma, as that would put it about 2 months after Katrina both in landfall (here) and for the report. Just a hunch.

A2K

[Scorpion]

I really am eager for the Wilma report. Hopefully it comes out before spring.

[cycloneye]

does the NHC try to go in any particular order releasing these reports?

There is no order about the release of the reports.As you can see one of the most anticipated reports the Katrina one was released on december 20 date which caught the vast majority including me offguard and was a surprise as we thought that the Katrina report would be one of the last ones to be out.So there is no order about the releasing of the reports.The next report out may be the Wilma one or may be Tropical Depression Ten or may be Zeta.That is why all here have to check this thread every day to see which new report is posted.

[Jim Cantore]

does the NHC try to go in any particular order releasing these reports?

There is no order about the release of the reports.As you can see one of the most anticipated reports the Katrina one was released on december 20 date which caught the vast majority including me offguard and was a surprise as we thought that the Katrina report would be one of the last ones to be out.So there is no order about the releasing of the reports.The next report out may be the Wilma one or may be Tropical Depression Ten or may be Zeta.That is why all here have to check this thread every day to see which new report is posted.

Lets play a game its called

whos next

lets vote

which report comes out next