Ex Invest 95L

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derek Ortt

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#201 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:53 pm

there is nothing there to watch.

Enjoy the week-end. Spend some time with your friends. Head to the links as if you are watching this system, it's going to be a long and painful week-end
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#202 Postby cpdaman » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:56 pm

ARIC what is that feature developing off georgia coast on water vapor loop? is it upper low

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/nwatl/loop-wv.html" target="_blank" target="_blank if link doesn't load fully go to NHC.noaa.gov site and look at NW atlantic wv loop

do you think it will have anyinfluence on changing shear for better or worse on 95L or possibly steering 95L
somewhere, anywhere? or developing itself
Last edited by cpdaman on Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#203 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:57 pm

I did not say 0% chance...what I said is both viewpoints of
it developing or it won't develop should be allowed.
So I am not against your viewpoints...I am disagreeing with it...
but I am not censoring it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Damar91
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: Coral Springs, FL

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#204 Postby Damar91 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:03 pm

Some of you are something else. Aric, you instigate more than you help. If you know soooo much then. become a pro-met. This board has really gone to crap. It's no wonder some of the old timers don't post any here anymore, not to mention the real pro's who actually know what they are talking about..... Now back to your regularly scheduled thread.....
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#205 Postby cpdaman » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:08 pm

guys i understand the lack of patience. but there is no need to name call

look someone loves tracking storms and is very optomistic about it

if your not optomistic abut storms right now then, i assume you are here to just check in post your question look at the anaylsis and log out . no harm
Last edited by cpdaman on Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Opal storm

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#206 Postby Opal storm » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:09 pm

Folks...this is a cloud we're talking about. Are you guys really this bored? :lol:
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#207 Postby cpdaman » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:12 pm

anyone care to enlighten me what the feature is off the georgia coast that has developed in the last few hours?

and the shear or steering implications it may have on the low near the lake
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22995
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Re:

#208 Postby wxman57 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:13 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:NHC was just declaring it an "invest" so they could run some models on it "just in case", perhaps just for practice for some of the new forecasters.
NHC forecasters are the best in the world and they do not declare invests so people can practice. NHC is a government agency who has a responsibility to protect the people. It really is that simple.


Can you explain how declaring an "invest" on a disorganized cluster of thunderstorms which is not expected to develop (just to run model data or for practice) could in any way harm the public? I know many of the forecasters at the NHC, and they are great forecasters. But I'd wager that 99.9999% of the people in the U.S. and Caribbean don't have a clue at all when an "invest" is declared. So how could they be impacted?

And, remember, there are things to test out. Just in the past week or two there were some significant software changes at the NHC with respect to the model data Any time such changes are made, it's possible that something was broken. So there is a need for testing to be sure that the system will function correctly when the next threat develops. So declaring an invest on a non threat for practice does serve the general public.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#209 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:20 pm

cpdaman wrote:anyone care to enlighten me what the feature is off the georgia coast that has developed in the last few hours?

and the shear or steering implications it may have on the low near the lake

i have been watching it.. it is a uLL loks to be lifting Ne need to wait and see
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#210 Postby x-y-no » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:23 pm

cpdaman wrote:anyone care to enlighten me what the feature is off the georgia coast that has developed in the last few hours?

and the shear or steering implications it may have on the low near the lake


Looks to me like just some divergence-driven convection.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#211 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:26 pm

Damar91 wrote:Some of you are something else. Aric, you instigate more than you help. If you know soooo much then. become a pro-met. This board has really gone to crap. It's no wonder some of the old timers don't post any here anymore, not to mention the real pro's who actually know what they are talking about..... Now back to your regularly scheduled thread.....


i have no need. i can learn without spending all money on it .. i am actually a Physicist I will have my BA in a year in Space Physics and exotic propulsion. but I have been doing the weather thing for quite a long time now.. and I do not instiage .. i just dont let random post that dont say much but tell someone that it wont develop go un answered maybe everyone else does i do not this is a discussion board right?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#212 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:28 pm

cpdaman wrote:guys i understand the lack of patience. but there is no need to name call

look someone loves tracking storms and is very optomistic about it

if your not optomistic abut storms right now then, i assume you are here to just check in post your question look at the anaylsis and log out . no harm


thank you

people just dont get it..
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: Re:

#213 Postby miamicanes177 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:40 pm

wxman57 wrote:Can you explain how declaring an "invest" on a disorganized cluster of thunderstorms which is not expected to develop (just to run model data or for practice) could in any way harm the public? I know many of the forecasters at the NHC, and they are great forecasters. But I'd wager that 99.9999% of the people in the U.S. and Caribbean don't have a clue at all when an "invest" is declared. So how could they be impacted?

And, remember, there are things to test out. Just in the past week or two there were some significant software changes at the NHC with respect to the model data Any time such changes are made, it's possible that something was broken. So there is a need for testing to be sure that the system will function correctly when the next threat develops. So declaring an invest on a non threat for practice does serve the general public.
NHC even scheduled for recon to investigate on sunday when they declared it an invest. They do not ever, ever, ever, declare hurricanes, tropical storms, tropical depressions or invests "just for practice". If it is for practice, then they would say something to the effect of "this is a test". NHC professionals do not need to practice anything. They are the best of the best. They are the equivalent of the Navy Seals. I never said issuing this invest would harm the public. I said the NHC has a duty to protect the public. By issuing this invest, they are simply following their duty to do just that. They got all the practice they needed before being hired. These are the big boys doing what they do best.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#214 Postby x-y-no » Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:46 pm

NHC professionals do not need to practice anything. They are the best of the best.


Nonsense. I don't care how good you are at any skill, you still need to practice in order to keep that edge.
0 likes   

User avatar
jrod
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:22 pm
Location: jacksonville, fl

#215 Postby jrod » Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:09 pm

The only area that looked decent was the area around 29N 57W. About 6 hours it looked good enough to have been a depresion imo. It has been quiet for awhile now like June is suppose to be, we'll get some action soon..........
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#216 Postby cpdaman » Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:14 pm

btw i wouldn't want the NHC doing any reconaissance testing and depleting there funds which we all know are not infinite

p.s localized street flooding in delray/boca from afternoon storms occuring now got between 1-1.50 inches
0 likes   

User avatar
Jam151
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:09 pm

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#217 Postby Jam151 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:35 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
cpdaman wrote:tampa bay

what ARIC and others are saying is that there is always a chance and thus it is never smart to say there is NO CHANCE when a low is in s.fl with 85 degree water around it

the NHC says upper level winds are not favorable NOW, and also they said upperlevel winds are not favorable for barry but sometimes they can become marginally favorable and allow development

so there maybe a 5% chance , just don't say 0%


thank you
was kind of getting sick of explaining my self


So you guys are saying ameteurs on a forum need to be politically correct in every post they make by giving something a 5% chance of development instead of just saying it won't develop? Come on let people voice their opinion on hopeless Invests freely. There's no being harm done so I feel as though a moot point is being argued.
0 likes   

User avatar
Jam151
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:09 pm

Re:

#218 Postby Jam151 » Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:37 pm

x-y-no wrote:
NHC professionals do not need to practice anything. They are the best of the best.


Nonsense. I don't care how good you are at any skill, you still need to practice in order to keep that edge.

Right....and the last time I checked, the navy seals still had to practice. :)
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#219 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:39 pm

So you guys are saying ameteurs on a forum need to be politically correct in every post they make by giving something a 5% chance of development instead of just saying it won't develop?

It seems as if the number rule here is that saying something definately will develop is OK, but if you dare to say something will NOT develop, you can expect to be treated the same as William Wallace was by the English
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: 95L Invest near Florida,Sat Pics,Models and Analysis

#220 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:44 pm

Jam151 wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
cpdaman wrote:tampa bay

what ARIC and others are saying is that there is always a chance and thus it is never smart to say there is NO CHANCE when a low is in s.fl with 85 degree water around it

the NHC says upper level winds are not favorable NOW, and also they said upperlevel winds are not favorable for barry but sometimes they can become marginally favorable and allow development

so there maybe a 5% chance , just don't say 0%


thank you
was kind of getting sick of explaining my self


So you guys are saying ameteurs on a forum need to be politically correct in every post they make by giving something a 5% chance of development instead of just saying it won't develop? Come on let people voice their opinion on hopeless Invests freely. There's no being harm done so I feel as though a moot point is being argued.


im sure all this come across different to everyone .. but the point is ... is that i myself am going to question everything that everyone says to find out where and why they came to that conclusion ... and that nobody knows for sure about whats going to happen...... so when there are post saying its dead or something like that .. the new people that come in here even though its says its not official are going to take as if it were.. and when you have 10 post that say its dead.. then you have a tendency to believe it.. the problem is , is that systems have developed many times after it was declared dead.. and is worth making sure people understand that even though it may look terrible and the odd are against it ... it can still happen.. which is very important to combat complacency .

but anyway no big deal .. this is a discussion board and anyone can do as they please .. and im going to question it.. and would like the same in return!!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, dl20415, Stratton23 and 52 guests