Alyono wrote:NHC refuses to bite, still 10/20 on the probs
I don't think they refuse to bite.They have time to watch these waves.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
tolakram wrote:What wave is this thread about? I'm going to make another post in the global thread. UKMet and Euro develop different features that end up near the same spot in 5 days. I think they are picking up on improved conditions but not locking into what wave will develop.
cycloneye wrote:tolakram wrote:What wave is this thread about? I'm going to make another post in the global thread. UKMet and Euro develop different features that end up near the same spot in 5 days. I think they are picking up on improved conditions but not locking into what wave will develop.
This is for the lead wave closer to Lesser Antilles. Yes,there is some confusion with this monsoon.
cycloneye wrote:tolakram wrote:What wave is this thread about? I'm going to make another post in the global thread. UKMet and Euro develop different features that end up near the same spot in 5 days. I think they are picking up on improved conditions but not locking into what wave will develop.
This is for the lead wave closer to Lesser Antilles. Yes,there is some confusion with this monsoon.
panamatropicwatch wrote:Well if whatever happens the shear in the Caribbean has to come down for anything traversing it. Right the wind shear is running at 40 to 50kts. Yuck
SFLcane wrote:Interesting times ahead if the models are correct. Shows one these wave heading wnw under a building ridge to its north tracking towards sfl/keys and into gulf. euorpean,canadian,ukmet all showing development now.
Here is the nogaps 00z
Alyono wrote:EC is NOT developing this disturbance, it is developing the one behind it
What we have is different models developing different disturbances. Thus, we do NOT have a model consensus on development
PTrackerLA wrote:Alyono wrote:EC is NOT developing this disturbance, it is developing the one behind it
What we have is different models developing different disturbances. Thus, we do NOT have a model consensus on development
Isn't the EC 'terrible' at storm formation in the MDR?
PTrackerLA wrote:Alyono wrote:EC is NOT developing this disturbance, it is developing the one behind it
What we have is different models developing different disturbances. Thus, we do NOT have a model consensus on development
Isn't the EC 'terrible' at storm formation in the MDR?
Users browsing this forum: RomP and 222 guests