94L Invest Comments Thread #2

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#241 Postby TS Zack » Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:52 am

When you have persistance like this for a couple days now then you begin to worry. If this continues we could have some troubles in the near future.

The remnants of 93L could be what spawns something in the Western Gulf.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#242 Postby Sanibel » Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:57 am

Edited: Think I jumped the gun on a vortex.
Last edited by Sanibel on Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#243 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:24 pm

TampaFl wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:LATEST FROM JB:

[i]-He thinks this has a decent chance of becoming a TS before landfall (similar to Allison or Dean).

**LOOKS INTERESTING FOR SURE!!!**


JB did not say this has a decent chance of becoming a TS before landfall. Quoting JB he said " fear is with outflow established now and the mischief one can get near the Texas coast, that a system can develop and have tropical storm force winds to the east of a center that is open to the west. In some respects, the genesis of such an event would resemble most closely an Allison or Dean, the latter being a 1995 storm on the upper Texas coast' end of quote..

Just want to make it clear on what JB is saying about this system. :D


Robert 8-)

Thanks for clearing that up. One of the reasons JB gets a bad rap sometimes is people put words in his mouth...like this time. He in NO WAY said it had a decent chance of becoming a TS before landfall...and EWG...I think that is your way of reading what he said because you are wanting that to happen. :wink:

Remember...this is kinda like winter forecasting last year when you are having a tendency to only look for the upsides to development of snow. YOu also have to look for why it won't happen. Please don't say JB is saying something he is not.

Thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#244 Postby KatDaddy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:28 pm

Well said AFM. Radar show some heavy rain on your doorstep. I am hoping to my fajitas grilled before it works it way up here to League City 8-)

I noticed you located in Pearland......I thought you were in Angleton?
Last edited by KatDaddy on Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#245 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:29 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
that would equal a "decent chance". I am trying to give what he is saying in a shorter space and w.o. directly quoting everything. His overall post this morning showed that it seems this system has a decent chance to him.

BTW, my definition of decent chance is 25% or better.


No...that would not equal a decent chance. A decent chance means a decent chance.

Let me explain this in terms that are simpler: When a Pro-Met says something has a decent chance...that is what they mean. If they think that a system has a decent chance...then they will say it. If they don't say those words...then don't say they did because someone else will come along and say"well JB said the western GOM system had a decent chance to be a TS and he was wrong again..." when he said nothing of the sort...you were just adding your spin to it.

Please don't do it. Paraphrasing is fine...adding to it based on what your criteria is is NOT...in my opinion.
0 likes   

NFLnut
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:37 pm

#246 Postby NFLnut » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:33 pm

KatDaddy wrote:Well said AFM. Radar show some heavy rain on your doorstep. I am hoping to my fajitas grilled before it works it way up here to League City 8-)

I noticed you located in Pearland......I thought you were in Angleton?



**OFF TOPIC**

How does a genuine Texan grill fajitas?! I've always cooked them on a skillet, but I would LOVE a grilled fajitas recipe for the BBQ since I have a brand new Kamado ceramic grill and haven't had a functioning grill for a coupla years!
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#247 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:36 pm

well if no one likes my posting JB's thoughts then may be I will just stop doing so. Basically, his tone and post suggested a decent shot (25%+ is what I consider decent) of something developing. He also went on to mention 35mph gusts being reported, and a possible Allison or Dean like scenario and the GFS showing deepening. To me, this all went on to say that he is thinking there is a decent shot at development. REMEMBER: decent does not mean definite.

What I am trying to do is condense JB's long posts into brief summarized accounts, and I think by saying he thinks the system has a "decent" shot is within the range of what is acceptable. If you want his EXACT words (un-summarized), then please feel free to become a member of Accuweather.com professional and interpret his posts for yourself.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#248 Postby KatDaddy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:36 pm

I simply buy the pre-marinated fajitas and throw them on the grill. Simple, quick and good. I am sure the are many different reciepes for marinating fajitas. Having a grill is awesome. I love it :)
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#249 Postby KatDaddy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:40 pm

Your posting of JB's info is appreciated. AFM is trying to make sure Joe does not get beat up out here at Storm2k. I understand exactly what he is saying. There are many posters who will pick apart anything Joe B says and use it to prove he is wrong.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

hurrican19
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Northwest Austin, TX

#250 Postby hurrican19 » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:42 pm

Very well said AFM.
0 likes   

User avatar
teal61
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Spring, TX

#251 Postby teal61 » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:52 pm

Here ya go EWG...the plot thickens 8-)

NOUS42 KNHC 021700 COR
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1300 AM EDT SUN 02 JUL 2006
SUBJECT: TROPICAL STORM PLAN OF THE DAY (TSPOD)
VALID 03/1100Z TO 04/1100Z JUL 2006
TSPOD NUMBER.....06-032

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA
FLIGHT ONE FLIGHT TWO
A. 03/1800Z A. 04/0600, 1200Z
B. AFXXX 01DDA INVEST B. AFXXX 0202A CYCLONE
C. 03/1500Z C. 04/0300Z
D. 26.0N 96.0W D. 28.5N 96.0W
E. 03/1700Z TO 2300Z E. 04/0530Z TO 1230Z
F. SFC TO 10000 FT F. SFC TO 10000 FT

2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: NEGATIVE AS SYSTEM
WILL MOVE INLAND.

II. PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK.....NEGATIVE.
ECD
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#252 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:52 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:well if no one likes my posting JB's thoughts then may be I will just stop doing so. Basically, his tone and post suggested a decent shot (25%+ is what I consider decent) of something developing. He also went on to mention 35mph gusts being reported, and a possible Allison or Dean like scenario and the GFS showing deepening. To me, this all went on to say that he is thinking there is a decent shot at development. REMEMBER: decent does not mean definite.

What I am trying to do is condense JB's long posts into brief summarized accounts, and I think by saying he thinks the system has a "decent" shot is within the range of what is acceptable. If you want his EXACT words (un-summarized), then please feel free to become a member of Accuweather.com professional and interpret his posts for yourself.


I am a member...that is why I know that he didn't say that. He said that with the mischief you can get along the Texas coast you can get a system that is open to the west but still have TS winds to the east....and that is his fear. Having a fear does not mean a decent shot....its just a fear....or in JB termonology...something that has him interested because of things that have happened in the past.

I am not saying don't summerize...but what I am saying is don't put words in his mouth. You could just as easily said JB has a fear of this thing turning into a TS Dean-like system...open on the west and TS force winds on the east...and that would have been a 100% accurate statement.

Maybe it doesn't mean much to amatuers...but to Pro-Mets...the term "decent chance" is a term we use when making forecasts...and when we use that term...or terms like it (not the term fear...etc)...we are basically sticking our neck out and saying "I think it will..."

Hope that helps.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#253 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:56 pm

KatDaddy wrote:Your posting of JB's info is appreciated. AFM is trying to make sure Joe does not get beat up out here at Storm2k. I understand exactly what he is saying. There are many posters who will pick apart anything Joe B says and use it to prove he is wrong.


And that is what I am saying. It has happened on here NUMEROUS times. JB said this...JB said that...when if you look at what he really said...no...he didn't say this or that....it was someone's paraphrase that they remembered or just their bad memory to begin with.

It's kinda like the comment the other day by someone who said some of the pro-mets on this board were calling for Alberto to dissipate...which it didn't so they will stick with the NHC...when they too were thinking there was an increasing likelyhood of the LLC detaching and moving west and dissipating over the BOC.

We have to remember what we heard and read accurately or people get a bad rap...and we have to quote or paraphrase people accurately...or they get a bad rap.

Thanks KD.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#254 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:59 pm

Ok AFM, I guess you are right. I will try to be more careful in my choice of words when summarizing JB's posts from now on. I can see how it might be annoying to a pro met.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#255 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:59 pm

It is in my opinion that the Job that a Pro-Met is one that is thankless. They could get the forecast right thousands of times and the one time the weather does not coorperate and something bad happens it washes away all those good things they have done in the past... IMO. Thier job is a very hard one and thier opinion should be respected. No one can really forecast the exact happenings of situations but, I think for the most part they have a good handle on most situations.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#256 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:59 pm

teal61 wrote:Here ya go EWG...the plot thickens 8-)

NOUS42 KNHC 021700 COR
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1300 AM EDT SUN 02 JUL 2006
SUBJECT: TROPICAL STORM PLAN OF THE DAY (TSPOD)
VALID 03/1100Z TO 04/1100Z JUL 2006
TSPOD NUMBER.....06-032

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA
FLIGHT ONE FLIGHT TWO
A. 03/1800Z A. 04/0600, 1200Z
B. AFXXX 01DDA INVEST B. AFXXX 0202A CYCLONE
C. 03/1500Z C. 04/0300Z
D. 26.0N 96.0W D. 28.5N 96.0W
E. 03/1700Z TO 2300Z E. 04/0530Z TO 1230Z
F. SFC TO 10000 FT F. SFC TO 10000 FT

2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: NEGATIVE AS SYSTEM
WILL MOVE INLAND.

II. PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK.....NEGATIVE.
ECD


VERY interesting...
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#257 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:05 pm

Kinda of surprising recon info though.

Seems as if whatever is out there will be inland by later this evening or Monday morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#258 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:06 pm

looks like the circulation is east of Brownsville and heading northward:

http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/radar.ph ... 1&loop=yes
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#259 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:09 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:Ok AFM, I guess you are right. I will try to be more careful in my choice of words when summarizing JB's posts from now on. I can see how it might be annoying to a pro met.


Thanks...and it is. You have NO idea how many times I have heard over my career..." Hey...I thought you said it was gonna rain yeasterday?"..."No...I said there was a chance of rain." or...my personal favorite..."Hey...is it about to rain?" ...asked when I am out and about at dinner and away from my computer and any technology to answer that question. To which, I usually answer (very sarcastically)..."I don't know...let my consult my built in weather radar located inside my skull...(looks up at ceiling)...nope...you'll be fine."

:lol:
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#260 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:10 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:Kinda of surprising recon info though.

Seems as if whatever is out there will be inland by later this evening or Monday morning.

That's what I'm thinking. This will be in late tonight. Don't think it has a tomorrow.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jr0d, Shawee, Sps123 and 40 guests