Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#241 Postby RL3AO » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:09 pm

I guess it depends how long the inner eyewall takes to collapse.
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re:

#242 Postby pojo » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:32 pm

WmE wrote:What does that hail inbound mean??

This means an extremely STRONG storm with cold cloud top thunderstorms along the eye wall.
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#243 Postby pojo » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:36 pm

Thunder44 wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:How much can we trust the surface wind thing on the recon?


I don't know, but alot of the SFMR reports have been coming up "suspect" and sometimes they don't correlate to the flight level wind reports. However, drospondes which are actual wind instruments taken down to the surface, didn't support it either.


the SFMR is BRAND new... give it some time... not ALL ARWOs are completely trained on the new equipment and NOT all aircrafts have the SFMR onboard. We are just learning the ropes with the new equipment.

Didn't support the SFMR suspect readings or the reasoning behind the NHC not to classify Dean as CAT5?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#244 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:50 pm

pojo wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:How much can we trust the surface wind thing on the recon?


I don't know, but alot of the SFMR reports have been coming up "suspect" and sometimes they don't correlate to the flight level wind reports. However, drospondes which are actual wind instruments taken down to the surface, didn't support it either.


the SFMR is BRAND new... give it some time... not ALL ARWOs are completely trained on the new equipment and NOT all aircrafts have the SFMR onboard. We are just learning the ropes with the new equipment.

Didn't support the SFMR suspect readings or the reasoning behind the NHC not to classify Dean as CAT5?


That seems to be what had the NHC hold Dean at 130 kt (I would have gone 135 just to keep from going over the deep end)
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#245 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:50 pm

pojo wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:How much can we trust the surface wind thing on the recon?


I don't know, but alot of the SFMR reports have been coming up "suspect" and sometimes they don't correlate to the flight level wind reports. However, drospondes which are actual wind instruments taken down to the surface, didn't support it either.


the SFMR is BRAND new... give it some time... not ALL ARWOs are completely trained on the new equipment and NOT all aircrafts have the SFMR onboard. We are just learning the ropes with the new equipment.

Didn't support the SFMR suspect readings or the reasoning behind the NHC not to classify Dean as CAT5?


I meant to say the drospondes didn't support Cat 5 intensity either.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#246 Postby pojo » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:53 pm

Thunder44 wrote:
pojo wrote:Didn't support the SFMR suspect readings or the reasoning behind the NHC not to classify Dean as CAT5?


I mean to say the drospondes didn't support Cat 5 intensity either.


When the storm reaches ~930mb, the dropsonde has problems recording the 925 and/or 1000mb readings. So yes, you are correct.
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#247 Postby pojo » Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:56 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:That seems to be what had the NHC hold Dean at 130 kt (I would have gone 135 just to keep from going over the deep end)


we do what we can to make sure th NHC has the correct information from the storm. They classify the storm by using several sources, not just the aircraft.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#248 Postby Pebbles » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:42 pm

I have a confession to make. Hurricane tracking wouldn't be the same for me if it wasn't for recon tracking and discussion. Pojo... *bows in an I'm not worthy manner* to you and all your coworkers. :notworthy:
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#249 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:12 pm

Critical number for Cat 5 is probably 155 (flight level winds of 155 kt).
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#250 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:18 pm

Dean visually has never looked better. This is no doubt going to be a bumpy mission and I think we are going to see some amazing obs.

Hats off to a safe flight.
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

#251 Postby Normandy » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:20 pm

Seems like the found a first wind maxima of 95 kts at flight level (80 kts surface).
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#252 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:21 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:Dean visually has never looked better. This is no doubt going to be a bumpy mission and I think we are going to see some amazing obs.

Hats off to a safe flight.


I agree, this could be one critical flight here as we find out what Dean's real intensity is. I would estimate 140 kt/924mb right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#253 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:22 pm

Looks the plane will make a pass from NE to SW first. So we should no how strong the winds really are by 8pm, since they will be flying over NE Quad first.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#254 Postby RL3AO » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:24 pm

Thunder44 wrote:Looks the plane will make a pass from NE to SW first. So we should no how strong the winds really are by 8pm, since they will be flying over NE Quad first.


They won't upgrade at 8 unless they get 160+ kt FL. They will wait for multiple passes.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#255 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:24 pm

Normandy wrote:Seems like the found a first wind maxima of 95 kts at flight level (80 kts surface).


That is 85 kt at the surface, and really high for that far out of the storm. That suggests the wind field has expanded greatly.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#256 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:25 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:Looks the plane will make a pass from NE to SW first. So we should no how strong the winds really are by 8pm, since they will be flying over NE Quad first.


They won't upgrade at 8 unless they get 160+ kt FL. They will wait for multiple passes.


That is probably correct. If they get in the 150s, they will probably go to 135 kt (155 mph) but to go to Cat 5 would likely need strong evidence. There would probably be a special advisory if they go up to Cat 5.
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Re:

#257 Postby Normandy » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:25 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Normandy wrote:Seems like the found a first wind maxima of 95 kts at flight level (80 kts surface).


That is 85 kt at the surface, and really high for that far out of the storm. That suggests the wind field has expanded greatly.


Oh 85 kt? Wow.
Yes, Dean has greatly expanded his windfield today,
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#258 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:31 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:Looks the plane will make a pass from NE to SW first. So we should no how strong the winds really are by 8pm, since they will be flying over NE Quad first.


They won't upgrade at 8 unless they get 160+ kt FL. They will wait for multiple passes.


That is probably correct. If they get in the 150s, they will probably go to 135 kt (155 mph) but to go to Cat 5 would likely need strong evidence. There would probably be a special advisory if they go up to Cat 5.


All they need is to find one report of FL 155kts or more and they can upgrade. Unless they other reasons for not upgrading like they did early this morning.
0 likes   

superfly

Re: Hurricane Dean Recon Discussion

#259 Postby superfly » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:32 pm

Looks like there's 3 wind maxima, sorta like what Katrina had at landfall. I doubt the peak wind will be as high as we saw earlier but the wind field has expanded greatly.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

#260 Postby wxwatcher91 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:35 pm

hurricane force winds now extend out at least 100 miles
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Sunnydays, wileytheartist and 36 guests