Ntxw wrote:Ok lets once again clarify this. A modoki El Nino and a CP El Nino are the same thing. Please lets not tag the "modoki" term because 2004 was one and had landfalls. Most El Ninos are modoki. The strong El Ninos are the traditional ones.
Now like NDG pointed out strength and locations of anomalies during the season seems to matter. Not if it is "modoki" or not. 2009 and 2006 were "modoki" but bc the eastern regions took longer to cool it suppressed activity. Modoki El ninos naturally are more active because they are weaker than the traditional EP El Ninos <- there are two of them since 1979).
Here is the paper on the two types of El Ninos
http://www.ess.uci.edu/~yu/PDF/Yu.2011.TAC.pdf
I understand the origin in that it's a Central Pacific rather than Eastern Pacific. I guess the naming throws me off a bit considering the definition of the word "Modoki". I'll take a look at these links. Thanks!