Spacecoast wrote:21 Hurricanes have crossed the Yucatan Channel during Oct / Nov(all recorded years).
The majority of these (12, or 57%) have hit Florida. Naples, Cape Coral, and Panama City seem to be climatologically popular.
2018 MICHAEL PANAMA CITY CAT5
2009 IDA PENSACOLA ET
2005 WILMA NAPLES CAT3
1964 ISBELL NAPLES CAT2
1948 UNNAMED KEYS / MIAMI CAT2
1946 UNNAMED TAMPA CAT1
1924 UNNAMED EVERGLADES / MIAMI CAT1
1921 UNNAMED TAMPA CAT3
1910 UNNAMED CAPE CORAL CAT21894 UNNAMED PANAMA CITY CAT3
1873 UNNAMED CAPE CORAL CAT31852 UNNAMED APALACHICOLA CAT2
https://i.ibb.co/THDLyQr/Capture6.jpg
Note that Ida (2009) was extratropical at landfall. If one excludes Ida and counts the remaining eleven cases, then eight (73%) of the remainder struck the FL peninsula from Tampa Bay southward. So if a hurricane were to pass through the Yucatán Channel during the months of October and/or November, it would be most likely to impact Central and/or South Florida (peninsular) as a hurricane. Based on historical data, Cat-3 status (105 knots) seems to be the uppermost boundary for these cases at landfall, given the influence of strong vertical wind shear related to incoming autumnal troughs, along with relatively cooler SSTs in the Gulf during October/November vs. August/September. So the fact that Central/South Florida has
not been impacted by a major hurricane yet is potentially very good news, since most of the region’s Cat-4+ hits have been related to CV-type, MDR-related activity during the peak months of August and September. (The exception, Cat-4 King ‘50, originated in the W Caribbean in October 1950, but actually headed NNW into Miami: an extremely unusual trajectory and location for the month of October.) So if we get a W-Caribbean major hurricane that tracks through the Channel and impacts Central/South FL, it would almost certainly be no stronger than a Cat-3 at landfall, and would more likely be weakening and/or steady-state than a MH impacting the same region in August/September. Again, very good news. Another Wilma would not be pleasant, but certainly much better than a Cat-4+.