Invest 97L: Comments, Sat Pics, Models Thread #3

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#301 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:51 am

Frank P wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
skysummit wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
jschlitz wrote:To be technical, yes it is relative


Looks like the new orleans MET that said there was alot of shear ahead of it and wasn't worried about it could be right folks...

remember all of the arguing about this last night 8-)


Yea...that was Bob Breck who mentioned something like that last night and we thought he was crazy.


He obviously saw something 99% of us including the NHC didn't see.


Yeah and Breck said last year that Katrina would NOT get into the GOM, for us not to worry about it and would be an east coast problem.... I'll never forget that.... he wasn't seeing all that well last year, perhaps he has had some lasak surgery since Katrina... :D


Yes he say something like that on Thursday when Katrina was still in the Atlantic but to his credit sounded the alarm on Friday evening. My brother lives north of N.O. and sent me a video of his broadcasts as the storm approached.
Last edited by Stormcenter on Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7192
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#302 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:51 am

gatorcane wrote:
skysummit wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
jschlitz wrote:To be technical, yes it is relative


Looks like the new orleans MET that said there was alot of shear ahead of it and wasn't worried about it could be right folks...

remember all of the arguing about this last night 8-)


Yea...that was Bob Breck who mentioned something like that last night and we thought he was crazy.


He obviously saw something 99% of us including the NHC didn't see.


unless you were at NHC yesterday dont think for a second that Breck is outforecasting anyone at NHC. I am sure NHC had all the scenarios covered and just because we dont see it in a disco or TWO that they arent aware of what is going on.
0 likes   

Johnny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1428
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:35 pm
Location: No Snow For You, Texas

#303 Postby Johnny » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:51 am

I think Masters was just throwing out a little food for thought. Alot of possibilities are on the table and he was just throwing one more into the frey. Will it happen? Not likely but it's a possibility.
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2777
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

#304 Postby Frank P » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:53 am

Stormcenter wrote:
Frank P wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
skysummit wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
jschlitz wrote:To be technical, yes it is relative


Looks like the new orleans MET that said there was alot of shear ahead of it and wasn't worried about it could be right folks...

remember all of the arguing about this last night 8-)


Yea...that was Bob Breck who mentioned something like that last night and we thought he was crazy.


He obviously saw something 99% of us including the NHC didn't see.


Don't get me wrong I like Breck, but he missed this one bad early on... j

Yeah and Breck said last year that Katrina would NOT get into the GOM, for us not to worry about it and would be an east coast problem.... I'll never forget that.... he wasn't seeing all that well last year, perhaps he has had some lasak surgery since Katrina... :D


Yes he say something like that on Thursday when Katrina was still in the Atlantic but to his credit sounded the alarm on Friday evening. My brother lives north of N.O. and sent me a video of his broadcasts as the storm approched.


Don't get me wrong I do like Breck, he has such passion for tropical weather, he just missed this one (Katrina) bad early on...
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23006
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#305 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:54 am

miamicanes177 wrote:Ok how does anyone know why Dr. Masters said the center location would increase the risk to the East Coast? I really see this going into the GOM...


One problem with that prediction is that all the dynamic models predict a mid to upper-level high over the southeast U.S. by Tuesday, about the time the system would reach western Cuba. It would seem unlikely that anything would track toward the east U.S. Coast or Florida if the GFS, ECMWF, and Canadian are correct.

Here's the mean flow from 700-400mb valid 7am CDT Tuesday (GFS):

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/debby19.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
beachbum_al
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2163
Age: 55
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: South Alabama Coast
Contact:

#306 Postby beachbum_al » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:55 am

miamicanes177 wrote:Ok how does anyone know why Dr. Masters said the center location would increase the risk to the East Coast? I really see this going into the GOM...


I am curious too. I would think if the center form more to the north would mean more of a Central/North east GOM threat and not MX,TX, or LA. And believe I wish this thing would go EAST...like out to sea.

And the computer models below his page show a more east than what it was showing but I don't see where it is going toward the East Coast. Would appreciate a mets opinion on this?
Last edited by beachbum_al on Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

#307 Postby Sanibel » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:56 am

Derek can't be all that bad if he golfs. ;-)
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7192
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#308 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:56 am

SCMedic wrote:http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=477&tstamp=200608

Maybe you should all read what the Jeff Masters has to say...Pretty solid synopsis.


an interesting read to say the least, lets see what recon finds and how things develop the next 6 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
cajungal
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2330
Age: 49
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Schriever, Louisiana (60 miles southwest of New Orleans)

#309 Postby cajungal » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:58 am

I think this will be more of a gulf problem and not an east coast problem. Unless the center closes off really far to the north. I still think this blob 97L is gulf bound.
0 likes   

User avatar
Beam
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:06 pm

#310 Postby Beam » Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:58 am

Easy on the gulf predictions, people. This thing has to develop first.

That said, there's definitely a closed circulation to the west and north-west of the convection. If it can get some thunderstorms over it, it'll probably be classified.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#311 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:05 pm

Beam wrote:Easy on the gulf predictions, people. This thing has to develop first.

That said, there's definitely a closed circulation to the west and north-west of the convection. If it can get some thunderstorms over it, it'll probably be classified.


Yep I agree. All we have now is maybe a borderline depression at best.
I would also not go as far as to put 97L in the GOM or send it up the East Coast. There is just too much that can change between now and the time it gets around those areas when it's movement might be affected.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

#312 Postby CajunMama » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:06 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
Beam wrote:Easy on the gulf predictions, people. This thing has to develop first.

That said, there's definitely a closed circulation to the west and north-west of the convection. If it can get some thunderstorms over it, it'll probably be classified.


Yep I agree. All we have now is maybe a borderline depression at best.
I would also not go as far as to put 97L in the GOM or send it up the East Coast. There is just too much that can change between now and the time it gets around those areas when it's movement might be affected.


I totally agree. Too much cart before the horse. Now i know everyone likes to speculate but my goodness!
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#313 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:06 pm

wasn't directed at you tony

only those making the generalized statements that fast systems cannot form
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6369
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

#314 Postby boca » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:07 pm

If the recaon found a SSW wind at 27mph would it be classified as a depression or would it be an outflow boundary from a thunderstorm the recon just happen to stumble on.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#315 Postby fci » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:07 pm

brunota2003 wrote:
SCMedic wrote:http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=477&tstamp=200608

Maybe you should all read what the Jeff Masters has to say...Pretty solid synopsis.

Hmmm...from Dr Masters Blog:
What the new center means for this storm
The separation of its center from the coast removes the primary impediment to intensification for 97L. It looks more likely that this storm will develop into at least a strong tropical storm, and probably a hurricane. The track such a hurricane might take is highly uncertain, but the more northerly center increases the risk for Haiti, the Dominican Republic, the Bahamas, and the U.S. East Coast.
Now with that said...I really dont like a more northern reformation...which is what happend...:eek: DIE!!! it better not be no East Coast storm...it better not be a storm period...


The part about a more northerly center was from his PREVIOUS blog not the latest blog. He said that since the new model data with relocated center won't be out until evening, he was repeating his previous blog from this morning.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38107
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#316 Postby Brent » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:08 pm

boca wrote:If the recaon found a SSW wind at 27mph would it be classified as a depression or would it be an outflow boundary from a thunderstorm the recon just happen to stumble on.


I don't know... but Claudette in 2003 was named because of a SSW wind after hours of recon searching. It was in the Central Caribbean and moving very rapidly(around 25-30 mph).
0 likes   
#neversummer

Derek Ortt

#317 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:09 pm

I think recon also found a full vortex in Claudette, though I may be mistaken
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#318 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:10 pm

Brent wrote:
boca wrote:If the recaon found a SSW wind at 27mph would it be classified as a depression or would it be an outflow boundary from a thunderstorm the recon just happen to stumble on.


I don't know... but Claudette in 2003 was named because of a SSW wind after hours of recon searching. It was in the Central Caribbean and moving very rapidly(around 25-30 mph).


TROPICAL STORM CLAUDETTE DISCUSSION NUMBER 1
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
5 PM EDT TUE JUL 08 2003

THE STRONG TROPICAL WAVE OVER THE CENTRAL CARIBBEAN WAS A MESS OF
CONFLICTING SIGNALS TODAY. ON ONE SIDE...THE SATELLITE APPEARANCE
WAS THAT OF A SIGNIFICANT TROPICAL STORM...WITH SATELLITE INTENSITY
ESTIMATES AS HIGH AS 45 KT FROM TAFB. ON THE OTHER SIDE...THE
HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT...WHICH MADE SEVERAL PASSES THROUGH THE
APPARENT CENTER AND FOUND NO CLOSED CIRCULATION. JUST AS THE PLANE
WAS LEAVING THE AREA AT 18Z IT FOUND 20 KT SOUTHWESTERLY WINDS...
INDICATING A POORLY-DEFINED CIRCULATION...AND PRESSURES OF
1006-1007 MB. BASED ON THIS...THE WAVE HAS BEEN UPGRADED TO
TROPICAL STORM CLAUDETTE. THE 45 KT INITIAL INTENSITY IS BASED ON A
57 KT FLIGHT-LEVEL WIND MEASURED BY THE AIRCRAFT.


THE INITIAL MOTION IS A VERY RAPID 280/25. CLAUDETTE IS SOUTH OF A
STRONG SUBTROPICAL RIDGE...AND SHOULD CONTINUE IN A FAST EAST TO
EAST-SOUTHEAST FLOW FOR ANOTHER 24 HR OR SO. AFTER THAT...THE
STORM WILL APPROACH A WEAKNESS IN THE RIDGE...WHICH WILL WEAKEN
FURTHER AFTER 48 HR AS A STRONG DEEP-LAYER TROUGH DEVELOPS OVER THE
EASTERN U. S.. NHC TRACK GUIDANCE RESPONDS TO THIS BY FORECASTING
A RAPID WEST-NORTHWESTWARD MOTION FOR 48 HR...FOLLOWED BY
DECELERATION AND A MORE NORTHWESTERLY TRACK. ONE POSSIBILITY TO BE
WATCHED IS THAT THE TROUGH COULD TURN CLAUDETTE MORE NORTHWARD THAN
FORECAST. HOWEVER... CURRENT TRENDS SUGGEST THAT CLAUDETTE WILL BE
WEST OF THE TROUGH AXIS IN 72-96 HR...WHICH WOULD PRODUCE A SLOWER
AND MORE WESTWARD MOTION.

CLAUDETTE CURRENTLY SHOWS GOOD ANTICYCLONIC OUTFLOW IN ALL
DIRECTIONS...AND AS LONG AS IT DOES NOT RUN UNDER THE UPPER-LEVEL
LOW TO THE WEST IT SHOULD CONTINUE TO STRENGTHEN. LARGE-SCALE
MODELS SUGGEST THAT THE UPPER-LEVEL WINDS SHOULD REMAIN
FAVORABLE...SO THE INTENSITY FORECAST CALLS FOR STRENGTHENING UNTIL
THE CENTER REACHES THE YUCATAN PENINSULA. AFTER SOME WEAKENING
OVER LAND...THE SYSTEM SHOULD RE-INTENSIFY OVER THE SOUTHWEST GULF
OF MEXICO.

WHILE THE WIND RADII ARE FAIRLY SMALL...OTHER NEAR-GALE WINDS
CONTINUE OVER THE NORTHERN AND NORTHEASTERN CARIBBEAN AWAY FROM
CLAUDETTE. PLEASE CONSULT FORECASTS FROM THE TROPICAL PREDICTION
CENTER AND THE WFO SAN JUAN PUERTO RICO FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

FORECASTER BEVEN


FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS

INITIAL 08/2100Z 15.0N 71.3W 45 KT
12HR VT 09/0600Z 15.8N 74.8W 50 KT
24HR VT 09/1800Z 16.9N 79.0W 55 KT
36HR VT 10/0600Z 18.0N 82.7W 60 KT
48HR VT 10/1800Z 19.3N 86.0W 65 KT
72HR VT 11/1800Z 21.0N 90.0W 45 KT...INLAND
96HR VT 12/1800Z 22.5N 92.5W 50 KT...OVER WATER
120HR VT 13/1800Z 24.0N 94.5W 55 KT
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#319 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:10 pm

Lets see what they find over the whole system. I would check about 50 miles north closer to the LLC southern side. Also get some wind data in stuff. Then we can see if it can be upgraded.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23006
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#320 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:11 pm

Grenada winds now southwest at 13 kts, 1009mb.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], TampaWxLurker and 46 guests