I think AFM did a good job in explaining a pro met's position, so I won't try to be redundant, but I will say a few things.
We as pro met's take time out of our busy schedules, that often include shiftwork, to contribute to this board. We have no personal gain from this board except for the satisfaction of contributing to it. That is why it bothers me to no end to see a pro met get bashed by somebody over a 'gut feeling' or 'hunch', especially when I see where they live (meaning the hunch usually leads to a storm track to where they live.) I, for the life of me, cannot figure that one out. If you disagree with me, that is fine, just back it up with some data. Have I been wrong? Heck yeah. I have been humbled many times, but I don't need somebody posting away how wrong I was. I can figure that out for myself and learn from it.
Given the data and the position of the storm yesterday, I would not change any of my opinions in hindsight. So an apology is not in order. What has happened is several relocations of the center which have changed the entire ballgame. Don't believe for one second the GFS actually got it right. I think it got darn lucky. It's 12z solution yesterday did not make meteorological sense based on a number of synoptic factors. The GFS also cannot forecast center relocations, so that is why I said it got lucky. Okay, my rant is done with.
Now onto today. I am very interested in seeing today's global output. 12z upper air analysis places a 593dm ridge over the SE U.S. The 500mb height over Miami is 591dm with a east wind. Therefore...there may be some more WNW than NW motion in the next 24 to 48 hours. This will be critical because it will determine how much land interaction there is with Cuba. Just something to watch.