Ed Mahmoud wrote:¡Aye Caramba!
Need 500 map for that time..
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ed Mahmoud wrote:¡Aye Caramba!
cycloneye wrote:Jan,what is the intensity shown in 7 days?
vacanechaser wrote:WOW... looks like the gfs may be on to something.... looks like interesting times ahead... now it seems we have 90l for the caribbean, we will be very busy the next week or so...
Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team
KFDM Meteorologist wrote:Right at Miami on the 21st
Ed Mahmoud wrote:vacanechaser wrote:WOW... looks like the gfs may be on to something.... looks like interesting times ahead... now it seems we have 90l for the caribbean, we will be very busy the next week or so...
Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team
90L won't be a Caribbean system for a week. It is the fresh from Africa system. 55 knots by SHIPS in 5 days, about a day East of the islands
It's comforting now, but it is also well over 10 days out and a lot can change in that timeframe. Looks like this has a higher than normal potential to hit somewhere though, and not be a fish like we all wanted it to be.KFDM Meteorologist wrote:GFS had the High west of Texas building back hopefully to protect us here in Texas.
vacanechaser wrote:WOW... looks like the gfs may be on to something.... looks like interesting times ahead... now it seems we have 90l for the caribbean, we will be very busy the next week or so...
Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team
Wx_Warrior wrote:You can pray for a fish but this one as the US on it's mind!
Brent wrote:The Euro track is a lot more ominous than the GFS because it doesn't go over the tall mountains of Hispanola. That could be the difference between a much weaker storm and a very strong hurricane.
shortwave wrote:anyone know the exact margin of error for location and strength 10 days out? a bit hungover to look it up at the moment..lol
The average 5-day track error from the NHC last year was just under 300 nautical miles ( http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/figs/OFCL_ATL_trk_error_trend_noTDs.gif )...and that was for developed systems. The current error for an undevloped system at 10+ days could easily be up to 700-1000+ nautical miles. lol. Basically it is a crap shoot.shortwave wrote:anyone know the exact margin of error for location and strength 10 days out? a bit hungover to look it up at the moment..lol
Users browsing this forum: redingtonbeach and 39 guests