Hurricane Daniel (05E) in CPAC
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
If only the EPAC had there own Recon, but the Pacific is so wide that it would take them more than day to get to Daniel.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Maybe they will upgrade Daniel to a Cat-5 in the After Season Reports.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Wait a minute. Does the Epac have 11 PM Advisories because I beleive the 11 PM should be out by now.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
The 2 AM will probably say that Daniel's winds have increased to 155 mph.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
benny wrote:ODTs were over 7 with Isabel... cloud tops haven't gotten as cold in Daniel. Let's not go over the top yet. Beautiful yes. Isabel strength... not on the basis of satellite only.
Umm, what are you talking about? I don't know what ODTs are and the cloud tops in Daniel are in fact just as cold as Isabel's. I have images of Isabel's cloud tops and they are almost the same but Daniel had some more deep red convection around the eye at certain times. I say, it's time to go over the top because we have a CAT5 on our hands. Now, even if some of these tools we use show Daniel isn't a CAT5, I'm not sold at all. I can tell at this point this isn't a category 4. CAT4's never look this good (except Floyd).
Isabel did not have that cold of cloud tops these kind of storms normally have warmer clouds. So yes this is a cat5. I remember tracking Isabel looked just like this with the red ring with the most intense convection over the southern part.
Yep, I have the image too.
Maybe they will upgrade Daniel to a Cat-5 in the After Season Reports.
They better, if they don't soon of course.
I think they will upgrade it at 5am.
That's what I was thinking.
More by me soon.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Usually when there is no recon, the NHC like to stay conservative with their numbers instead of jumping the gun. IMO they'll graudually increase his wind speeds over the next 2-3 advisories.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:How about Hurricane Emily of last year, I mean she didn't have as as good as a SAT presentation as Daniel, but she was upgraded.
Emily did receive 7.0 from TAFB (140) knots at 2345Z on the 16th and 0545 on the 17th. Recon did not support the first estimate, but did briefly support the latter.
ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/pub/atcf/archive ... 052005.dat
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/di ... .025.shtml?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/di ... .026.shtml?
0 likes
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:IMO they'll graudually increase his wind speeds over the next 2-3 advisories.
They have been doing that this whole time

Usually when there is no recon, the NHC like to stay conservative with their numbers instead of jumping the gun.
That's what I have found in many Epac systems as well. Atlantic, not really.
Current Strength IMO: 145 Knots
0 likes
This is one of the best formed eyes a hurricaen can have.
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc0 ... atest.html
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc0 ... atest.html
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
I just saw the comparison a few pages back Cyclenall and I think Daniel deserves an upgrade. I'm going to sound crazy, but IMO Daniel is a better looking Annular than Isabel.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Also don't believe Katrina got above 6.5 so?
The 0545Z estimates on the morning of the 28th were 6, 6.5, and 7, with 6.5 being the one supported by recon. The following round of estimates were unaminous 7.0s, which matched recon. Katrina did receive a 7.5 from TAFB on the next round of estimates, while the other two agencies stayed with 7.0
ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/pub/atcf/archive ... 122005.dat
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/di ... .020.shtml?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2005/di ... .022.shtml?
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Does anyone have a loop of Daniel that starts from when he just formed to now?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, Google Adsense [Bot], lolitx, Sunnydays, WeatherCat and 49 guests