INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6110
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#341 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:28 pm

Taking bets now...no jk...but we should make a poll about whether we think this could develop or not
0 likes   

User avatar
knotimpaired
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:14 am
Location: Vieques, PR
Contact:

#342 Postby knotimpaired » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:28 pm

What are everyone's theory about African Dust?

We have not seen Puerto Rico which is about 7 miles away for weeks and weeks.

Today it is as clear as a bell and we can see buildings.

Rumors down here say that if the African Dust settles then a "storm is a brewing".

But this system seems way to south for that. Any idea what and if the Dust has to do with the storm tracks?
0 likes   

User avatar
canetracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 751
Age: 62
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#343 Postby canetracker » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:34 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:Taking bets now...no jk...but we should make a poll about whether we think this could develop or not

I, for one, would vote that it is questionable for development. I do, however, think it is indicative of signs of things to come for mid to latter August and Septmeber. Yesterday evening this area was just a convective wave along the ITCZ and all of sudden it spun up.
99L bears watching but my main concern is not so much this area, but the pattern of development it is pointing to for the remainder of the season.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#344 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:35 pm

Unless it has some crazy blowup tonight, I don't know how well tomorrow will go.
0 likes   

User avatar
TexWx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
Contact:

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#345 Postby TexWx » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:36 pm

Seems as if the circulation is just running away.
0 likes   

philnyc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, New York City, New York
Contact:

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#346 Postby philnyc » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:36 pm

NONAME wrote:What is the Diffrence between DSHP and SHIP because they are different at 120hrs out with DSHP 62kt and SHIP at 77


Where's the dry air? Here is the GFS Global forecast for tomorrow afternoon (2007-07-31 at 18Z), with 99L's position annotated with red circle:

Image

Where is everybody finding mid-level dry air?
0 likes   

User avatar
canetracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 751
Age: 62
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#347 Postby canetracker » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:43 pm

philnyc wrote:
NONAME wrote:What is the Diffrence between DSHP and SHIP because they are different at 120hrs out with DSHP 62kt and SHIP at 77


Where's the dry air? Here is the GFS Global forecast for tomorrow afternoon (2007-07-31 at 18Z), with 99L's position annotated with red circle:

Image

Where is everybody finding mid-level dry air?

I really look forward to your posts. Although, I can't answer your question, I do have a question for you. Why do your charts show moisture when the water vavor loop shows dry air? Is the water vapor showing surface level? Just trying to learn and thanks in advance for your reply.
0 likes   

philnyc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, New York City, New York
Contact:

Re:

#348 Postby philnyc » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:48 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:we are not seeing chantal on its way. The thing is light years away from TD status. That convective blow up is not even associated with the MLC, but appears to be related to some convergence east of it. Yes, a center could reform it the convergence can persist for about 24h... but that would slow development even more.


"Yes, a center could reform if the convergence can persist for about 24h... but that would slow development even more."

Hi Derek!
Can you explain that last statement? Why would a reformed center slow down development?

Phil :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#349 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:50 pm

I like the anticylonic outflow aloft. I think it has a decent shot of developing over the next few days.
0 likes   

User avatar
btangy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:06 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

#350 Postby btangy » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:50 pm

I would be extremely careful with the GFS analysis or any analysis/reanalysis' mid-level humidity over the tropical oceans. It is notorious for being one of the most uncertain variables and is subject to some potentially large errors. Satellites can't resolve mid-level moisture well and there are no radiosondes obviously to constrain the model 'first guess.'
0 likes   

TheRingo
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 170
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 4:46 pm

Re: Re:

#351 Postby TheRingo » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:50 pm

philnyc wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:we are not seeing chantal on its way. The thing is light years away from TD status. That convective blow up is not even associated with the MLC, but appears to be related to some convergence east of it. Yes, a center could reform it the convergence can persist for about 24h... but that would slow development even more.


"Yes, a center could reform if the convergence can persist for about 24h... but that would slow development even more."

Hi Derek!
Can you explain that last statement? Why would a reformed center slow down development?

Phil :)


maybe this new center is the wave detaching itself from the itcz.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#352 Postby skysummit » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:53 pm

I can't wait to see what the morning holds...if anything.

Image
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#353 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:55 pm

new center would take some time to form; tus, slowing development

As for the GFS model analysis, it is totally WORTHLESS. Unless there was a change, the GFS does NOT assimilate humidity data. The Barbados sounding showed air far drier than anything suggested by GFS
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanefloyd5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1659
Age: 44
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:53 am
Location: Spartanburg
Contact:

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#354 Postby hurricanefloyd5 » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:55 pm

looks like the center shiftedcloser/near the thunderstorms now!!!!!!!!
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#355 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:00 pm

Still not even close to being a depression. It has a lot of work left to do.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#356 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:01 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#357 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:02 pm

I still say give it a few days. It likely will have a much better chance once it reaches the central/western Caribbean.
0 likes   

philnyc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, New York City, New York
Contact:

Re: INVEST 99L,East of Windwards

#358 Postby philnyc » Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:03 pm

canetracker wrote:
philnyc wrote:
NONAME wrote:What is the Diffrence between DSHP and SHIP because they are different at 120hrs out with DSHP 62kt and SHIP at 77


Where's the dry air? Here is the GFS Global forecast for tomorrow afternoon (2007-07-31 at 18Z), with 99L's position annotated with red circle:


Where is everybody finding mid-level dry air?


I really look forward to your posts. Although, I can't answer your question, I do have a question for you. Why do your charts show moisture when the water vapor loop shows dry air? Is the water vapor showing surface level? Just trying to learn and thanks in advance for your reply.


Thanks, canetracker!
The water vapor loops most people use are really showing UPPER LEVEL water vapor which has little to do with tropical development. Satellites that measure radiated energy from upper level moisture often "see" only that - the upper levels, because that upper level radiation masks any radiation from the mid and lower level water vapor beneath it. So the energy from the middle and lower levels is never seen.
Since it is water vapor in the middle levels of the troposphere that are critical in helping a developing disturbance or even a strong one to intensify, you need to make sure that the water vapor sat you're looking at is middle level. This season, CIMSS added a really good satellite view of water vapor (I suspect because so many people were mistakenly confusing upper with mid-level). Here's the link:
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/wavetrak/winds/m8wvmid.html

The only unfortunate thing about it is that it still doesn't give you "exact" numbers to make decisions by. That's why I love the ARL REAL system where you can make maps like I did above. Here's the link:
http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/cmet.html

It takes a little practice to use it, but it's totally worth it. For the tropics, I prefer the GFS global model (drop down menu is there). You will visually know what's really going on and what's forecast to happen, rather than have to picture it in your mind.
If there's one thing I'd like to see happen here with all of these discussions, it would be to stop seeing that upper level water vapor chart. If I didn't have anything else, I'd look at it, but why bother when we have these new, better tools?
Last edited by philnyc on Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#359 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:03 pm

RL3AO wrote:Still not even close to being a depression. It has a lot of work left to do.


Yep, it isn't even a low right now even though it has some decent convection. But plenty of time to develop. 98L will be named first if it does.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#360 Postby PTrackerLA » Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:09 pm

This new flare-up keeps things somewhat interesting with this system. As others have stated, I can't wait to see what it looks like in the morning. Development will likely be very slow but IMO, if it can keep somewhat of an identity to make it into the central and western Caribbean all bets are off.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: redingtonbeach and 46 guests