Largest eye at landfall in the United States

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derek Ortt

#41 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:48 pm

marginal cat 3 (which I highly doubt Alica was... 100KT at 850mb does not equate to a cat 3 hurricane), may be the MPI for the northern GOM (barring QG enhancement of course). That may explain why weaker systems like Humberto and Cindy intensify up until landfall, but the more intense storms like Katrina weaken quickly
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34005
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#42 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:47 pm

My guess for Alicia is 90 kt, thinking the 100 kt was indeed flight level but the maximum winds were not measured.
0 likes   

User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 57
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

Re: Largest eye at landfall in the United States

#43 Postby LSU2001 » Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:23 pm

Image

Audrey looked pretty large and intense as she approached the Tx. La. coasts.
Tim

This wikipedia entry for Betsy sounds eerily familiar to the stories after Katrina.


Betsy also drove a storm surge into Lake Pontchartrain, just north of New Orleans, and the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, a deep-water shipping channel to the east and south. Levees for the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet along Florida Avenue in the Lower Ninth Ward and on both sides of the Industrial Canal failed. The flood water reached the eaves of houses in some places and over some one story roofs in the Lower Ninth Ward. Some residents drowned in their attics trying to escape the rising waters.

These levee breaches flooded parts of Gentilly, the Upper Ninth Ward, and the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans as well as Arabi and Chalmette in neighboring St. Bernard Parish. President Lyndon Johnson visited the city, promising New Orleans Mayor Vic Schiro federal aid.

It was ten days or more before the water level in New Orleans went down enough for people to return to their homes. It took even longer than that to restore their flooded houses to a livable condition. Those who did not have family or friends with dry homes had to sleep in the shelters at night and forage for supplies during the day, while waiting for the federal government to provide emergency relief in the form of trailers.

In all, 164,000 homes were flooded at the second landfall.

Evidence suggests that cheap construction and poor maintenance of the structures led to the failure of the levees. However, popular rumor persists that they were intentionally breached, possibly as a means of salvaging the more prosperous French Quarter.[7] Similar rumors abound in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#44 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:24 pm

a recent study by Brian jarvinen showed that Audrey was a cat 1 hurricane at landfall (shows that ALL hurricanes must be taken very seriously). It has been posted here before
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re:

#45 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:36 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:marginal cat 3 (which I highly doubt Alica was... 100KT at 850mb does not equate to a cat 3 hurricane), may be the MPI for the northern GOM (barring QG enhancement of course). That may explain why weaker systems like Humberto and Cindy intensify up until landfall, but the more intense storms like Katrina weaken quickly



I assume then (I don't actually know), a Cat 3 or Cat 4 storm like the famous 1900 Galveston storm was probably a Cat 5 in the Central Gulf?



Just another reason to live in Texas, I suppose.
0 likes   

User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 57
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

Re:

#46 Postby LSU2001 » Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:40 am

Derek Ortt wrote:a recent study by Brian jarvinen showed that Audrey was a cat 1 hurricane at landfall (shows that ALL hurricanes must be taken very seriously). It has been posted here before


Very, very interesting Derek, I have always heard about how horrible Audrey was and how it was a Cat. 4 at landfall. I read the part of the study on Audrey and WOW. If it was really a Cat 4 the disaster would have been much much worse. (it was bad enough as a Cat. 1) I really liked the part about how Audrey was like Katrina in that it had a large windfield and it was this that pushed the surge.

Just goes to show you can learn something new everyday
:P
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Largest eye at landfall in the United States

#47 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:29 pm

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/12Tides.pdf



Audrey only had Cat 1 winds, but a central pressure normally found in a Cat 3, and a larger than normal envelope of maximum winds. Hence a storm surge normally associated with higher winds.


Maybe somebody should create an "Enhanced Saffir-Simpson" scale that takes into account major hurricane type surge as well as wind and central pressure.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34005
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#48 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:10 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:marginal cat 3 (which I highly doubt Alica was... 100KT at 850mb does not equate to a cat 3 hurricane), may be the MPI for the northern GOM (barring QG enhancement of course). That may explain why weaker systems like Humberto and Cindy intensify up until landfall, but the more intense storms like Katrina weaken quickly



I assume then (I don't actually know), a Cat 3 or Cat 4 storm like the famous 1900 Galveston storm was probably a Cat 5 in the Central Gulf?



Just another reason to live in Texas, I suppose.


Some of them probably were. The Galveston storm (my guess for that is 110 kt at landfall) was probably about 130-135 kt at its peak (it could have been Cat 5 though), although some other notable storms like the Indianola hurricane were likely Cat 5 at peak intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re:

#49 Postby Category 5 » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:40 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:a recent study by Brian jarvinen showed that Audrey was a cat 1 hurricane at landfall (shows that ALL hurricanes must be taken very seriously). It has been posted here before


I assume it just weakened rapidly before landfall correct?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re:

#50 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:51 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:a recent study by Brian jarvinen showed that Audrey was a cat 1 hurricane at landfall (shows that ALL hurricanes must be taken very seriously). It has been posted here before


Interesting. I read it was a Category 4. From the radar image I have seen, it was quite large.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Re:

#51 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:54 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Some of them probably were. The Galveston storm (my guess for that is 110 kt at landfall) was probably about 130-135 kt at its peak (it could have been Cat 5 though), although some other notable storms like the Indianola hurricane were likely Cat 5 at peak intensity.


I tend to think the Great Galveston Hurricane of 1900 was a large hurricane. I have read that the Indianola Hurricane hit Texas as a Category 5 hurricane. 1886 was a bad year for Texas in which four hurricanes affected the state, like what Florida went through in 2004. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Largest eye at landfall in the United States

#52 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:56 pm

LSU2001 wrote:\

Evidence suggests that cheap construction and poor maintenance of the structures led to the failure of the levees. However, popular rumor persists that they were intentionally breached, possibly as a means of salvaging the more prosperous French Quarter.[7] Similar rumors abound in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.


Same thing they said with the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927, when levees were bombed for the water to flow into St. Bernard Parish.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#53 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:53 pm

Big Eyes= Big Surges if the windfield follows along the
Gulf Coast
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#54 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:39 pm

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/12Tides.pdf

here is the link to the Jarvinen study that shows Audrey as a cat 1
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Largest eye at landfall in the United States

#55 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:44 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/12Tides.pdf



Audrey only had Cat 1 winds, but a central pressure normally found in a Cat 3, and a larger than normal envelope of maximum winds. Hence a storm surge normally associated with higher winds.


Maybe somebody should create an "Enhanced Saffir-Simpson" scale that takes into account major hurricane type surge as well as wind and central pressure.




Jinx...
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: Largest eye at landfall in the United States

#56 Postby Category 5 » Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:21 am

That report pretty much makes Audrey sound like a Katrina like storm, it's winds fell rapidly but the pressure rose more slowly. Resulting in a very abnormal Wind Speed/Pressure combination.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34005
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Largest eye at landfall in the United States

#57 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:47 am

LSU2001 wrote:Image

Audrey looked pretty large and intense as she approached the Tx. La. coasts.
Tim

This wikipedia entry for Betsy sounds eerily familiar to the stories after Katrina.


Betsy also drove a storm surge into Lake Pontchartrain, just north of New Orleans, and the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, a deep-water shipping channel to the east and south. Levees for the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet along Florida Avenue in the Lower Ninth Ward and on both sides of the Industrial Canal failed. The flood water reached the eaves of houses in some places and over some one story roofs in the Lower Ninth Ward. Some residents drowned in their attics trying to escape the rising waters.

These levee breaches flooded parts of Gentilly, the Upper Ninth Ward, and the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans as well as Arabi and Chalmette in neighboring St. Bernard Parish. President Lyndon Johnson visited the city, promising New Orleans Mayor Vic Schiro federal aid.

It was ten days or more before the water level in New Orleans went down enough for people to return to their homes. It took even longer than that to restore their flooded houses to a livable condition. Those who did not have family or friends with dry homes had to sleep in the shelters at night and forage for supplies during the day, while waiting for the federal government to provide emergency relief in the form of trailers.

In all, 164,000 homes were flooded at the second landfall.

Evidence suggests that cheap construction and poor maintenance of the structures led to the failure of the levees. However, popular rumor persists that they were intentionally breached, possibly as a means of salvaging the more prosperous French Quarter.[7] Similar rumors abound in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.


The eroded eastern eyewall makes me think Audrey was a weakening storm at landfall in the later stages of an ERC. My thinking is that the pressure was around 950mb at landfall (a blend of the data), so it was considerably weaker than Rita. My guess is 85 kt for the landfall intensity (and I think 100 kt was its peak intensity, even though the pressure was higher at about 958mb at that time - ERC's were enlarging the storm greatly).
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#58 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:09 am

That same Jarvinen study showed that the Galveston hurricnae was in deed a marginal cat 4 at landfall
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Largest eye at landfall in the United States

#59 Postby Recurve » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:49 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/12Tides.pdf



Audrey only had Cat 1 winds, but a central pressure normally found in a Cat 3, and a larger than normal envelope of maximum winds. Hence a storm surge normally associated with higher winds.


Maybe somebody should create an "Enhanced Saffir-Simpson" scale that takes into account major hurricane type surge as well as wind and central pressure.


If I have it right, that's somewhat the direction Powell is going with the H*Wind analysis, tries to get a better handle on the windfield and assigns categories up to 6 in .1 increments. Sorry I don't have a link but it's on the AOML/HRD site I believe.
0 likes   

richtrav
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:48 pm
Location: South Texas

#60 Postby richtrav » Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:18 am

The Texas coast, especially the southern part, has some pretty dry desert country to its west. I thought that was a big reason that Allen did not turn into an absolute disaster for the southern coast, it apparently sucked in enough air from the Mexican deserts to cripple it before landfall. That and the path most big hurricanes have to take to get to the southern coast generally involve crossing the Yucatan (though Beulah and Emily both crossed the Yucatan and redeveloped into Cat 3s anyways)
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LarryWx, Ulf and 21 guests