The fallacy of calling 94L Ivan ...

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#41 Postby coriolis » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:41 pm

Does this mean that the forecasts for landfalls anywhere from east coast florida to texas were all right after all? It only took 3 landfalls to do it.
0 likes   
This space for rent.

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38102
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#42 Postby Brent » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:42 pm

HurryKane wrote:
yoda wrote:
HurryKane wrote:
...the NHC is going against their history here.


Well, apparently it wasn't without the vigorous type of debate we've seen here:

WTNT44 KNHC 222302
TCDAT4
TROPICAL DEPRESSION IVAN SPECIAL DISCUSSION NUMBER 67
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
7 PM EDT WED SEP 22 2004

AFTER CONSIDERABLE AND SOMETIMES ANIMATED IN-HOUSE DISCUSSION OF THE
DEMISE OF IVAN...IN THE MIDST OF A LOW-PRESSURE AND SURFACE FRONTAL
SYSTEM OVER THE EASTERN UNITED STATES...THE NATIONAL HURRICANE
CENTER HAS DECIDED TO CALL THE TROPICAL CYCLONE NOW OVER THE GULF
OF MEXICO TROPICAL DEPRESSION IVAN. WHILE DEBATE WILL SURELY
CONTINUE HERE AND ELSEWHERE...THIS DECISION WAS BASED PRIMARILY ON
THE REASONABLE CONTINUITY OBSERVED IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE
AND LOW-LEVEL CIRCULATION.



yep.. very interesting. Oh well. Wonder what they mean by animated...


Oh, I'm kinda hoping Stewart took Avila DOWN, baby!

:D


CNN just reported arrests at the NHC...

:lol: :lol: :lol:
0 likes   
#neversummer

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38102
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#43 Postby Brent » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:42 pm

coriolis wrote:Does this mean that the forecasts for landfalls anywhere from east coast florida to texas were all right after all? It only took 3 landfalls to do it.


Well if you believe Ivan is really Ivan, yes. :wink:
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#44 Postby yoda » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:42 pm

Oh dear Brent. Was Avila one of them? :lol: :lol:
0 likes   

recmod
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#45 Postby recmod » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:43 pm

SO..........are you guys saying that when Jeanne spit out its low level circulation center to the west over Cuba earlier this week that the newly formed circulation should have resulted in a name change????????????

How about Mitch in 1998??? That one was a non-entity for days over Central America before reforming in the Gulf. The NHX retained his name then.... I really don't see any lack of continuity in the NHX reasoning.

One thing I WOULD like to add....to those on the board earlier this week that were naysaying the possible return of Ivan: Many of you were quite beligerent in your ridicule of anyone who posted the possibility of Ivan coming back. I could "cut and paste" many nasty posts from know-it-alls that have turned out to be wrong. The bottom line: everyone should be welcome to post their observations and opinions on this board. If you don't agree, that's fine. Posts reasons and logic to back up your own opinion. But keep the childish rebukes to yourself.
0 likes   

recmod
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#46 Postby recmod » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:43 pm

oops...NHX in my last post chould have read NHC
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38102
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#47 Postby Brent » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:44 pm

yoda wrote:Oh dear Brent. Was Avila one of them? :lol: :lol:


Hopefully.

:roflmao:
0 likes   
#neversummer

jude
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:53 am

#48 Postby jude » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:49 pm

Isn't tha same name game going to create havoc with computer systems for years to come?
Glad I don't teach a weather statistics course.
0 likes   

User avatar
FritzPaul
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 468
Age: 58
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 7:09 pm
Location: Pensacola, FL
Contact:

#49 Postby FritzPaul » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:50 pm

yoda wrote:
HurryKane wrote:
...the NHC is going against their history here.


Well, apparently it wasn't without the vigorous type of debate we've seen here:

WTNT44 KNHC 222302
TCDAT4
TROPICAL DEPRESSION IVAN SPECIAL DISCUSSION NUMBER 67
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
7 PM EDT WED SEP 22 2004

AFTER CONSIDERABLE AND SOMETIMES ANIMATED IN-HOUSE DISCUSSION OF THE
DEMISE OF IVAN...IN THE MIDST OF A LOW-PRESSURE AND SURFACE FRONTAL
SYSTEM OVER THE EASTERN UNITED STATES...THE NATIONAL HURRICANE
CENTER HAS DECIDED TO CALL THE TROPICAL CYCLONE NOW OVER THE GULF
OF MEXICO TROPICAL DEPRESSION IVAN. WHILE DEBATE WILL SURELY
CONTINUE HERE AND ELSEWHERE...THIS DECISION WAS BASED PRIMARILY ON
THE REASONABLE CONTINUITY OBSERVED IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE
AND LOW-LEVEL CIRCULATION.

ONCE THE LOW PRESSURE AREA REACHED THE GULF OF MEXICO IT BEGAN TO
GRADUALLY DEVELOP CONVECTION AND A SURFACE CIRCULATION. SATELLITE
IMAGES...RECON DATA AND BUOYS IN THE GULF OF MEXICO INDICATE THAT
THE SYSTEM IS ORGANIZED ENOUGH TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A TROPICAL
DEPRESSION. THE CURRENT SOUTHERLY SHEAR OVER THE DEPRESSION IS
FORECAST TO RELAX A LITTLE...ENOUGH TO ALLOW THE SYSTEM TO REGAIN
TROPICAL STORM STATUS BEFORE LANDFALL.

THE BEST ESTIMATE OF THE INITIAL MOTION IS 295/12 KNOTS. THIS
GENERAL MOTION IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE AROUND THE SUBTROPICAL HIGH
CENTERED OVER THE UNITED STATES. THE INTENSITY AND TRACK FORECASTS
AS WELL AS THE WIND RADII REQUIRE THE ISSUANCE OF A TROPICAL STORM
WARNING FROM THE MOUTH OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SARGENT TEXAS.

FORECASTER AVILA


yep.. very interesting. Oh well. Wonder what they mean by animated...[/quote]

Meaning they couldn't arrive at a peaceful consensus.
They may need a bear watch issued for the NHC! :P
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#50 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:50 pm

Omg...why don't people read?

recmod...Jeanne was a CONTINUOUS TROPICAL CYCLONE...Jeanne neither A) became extratropical or B) became a tropical wave. Refer to my earlier post on the difference.


Mitch had a continuous surface low...now...just because the clouds are gone doesn't mean it's a non-entity.

IVAN...had become extratropical...IVAN's surface center disappeared....IVAN split into two 500 mb vorts.

:)
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

#51 Postby HurryKane » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:51 pm

Brent wrote:
yoda wrote:Oh dear Brent. Was Avila one of them? :lol: :lol:


Hopefully.

:roflmao:


See, I can decode government speak. Avila wrote it, so...

AFTER CONSIDERABLE AND SOMETIMES ANIMATED IN-HOUSE DISCUSSION OF THE
DEMISE OF IVAN...


What that really means is "Stewart dropped me headfirst on the floor and gave me the noogie of a lifetime." And then...

WHILE DEBATE WILL SURELY
CONTINUE HERE AND ELSEWHERE...THIS DECISION WAS BASED PRIMARILY ON
THE REASONABLE CONTINUITY OBSERVED IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE
AND LOW-LEVEL CIRCULATION.


This translates to "I AM RIGHT, dammit, but Stewart made me see stars so I have to grudingly agree with his superior analysis."

:)
Last edited by HurryKane on Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#52 Postby Stormsfury » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:52 pm

recmod wrote:SO..........are you guys saying that when Jeanne spit out its low level circulation center to the west over Cuba earlier this week that the newly formed circulation should have resulted in a name change????????????


NOPE .. clearly the same weather system, no troughs interacting into splitting the "CORE CIRC" ... a relocated, or new center developing within an ongoing storm is all too common ... yet, when IVAN completely LOSES its SFC circ to and absorbed by an extratropical low pressure system ... and only a sliver of a 500mb vort max is the only thing left, NO SFC reflection ... WTF?

How about Mitch in 1998??? That one was a non-entity for days over Central America before reforming in the Gulf. The NHX retained his name then.... I really don't see any lack of continuity in the NHX reasoning.


Again, no splitting of the system ... the system didn't split into two pieces thusly the CORE of Mitch was still intact ...

One thing I WOULD like to add....to those on the board earlier this week that were naysaying the possible return of Ivan: Many of you were quite beligerent in your ridicule of anyone who posted the possibility of Ivan coming back. I could "cut and paste" many nasty posts from know-it-alls that have turned out to be wrong. The bottom line: everyone should be welcome to post their observations and opinions on this board. If you don't agree, that's fine. Posts reasons and logic to back up your own opinion. But keep the childish rebukes to yourself.


I backed my opinions up with sound reasoning and meteorological thoughts on why I believed it did didn't have much of a chance ... dry air, stable boundary layer air, etc ...

Well, I busted ... and the one player that I didn't think would aid in re-development (a boost from the deep tropical regions), occurred ...

SF
0 likes   

Guest

#53 Postby Guest » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:54 pm

Stormsfury I agree. NHC has broke the common law.
0 likes   

User avatar
greeng13
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 838
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 4:23 pm
Location: charleston, sc

#54 Postby greeng13 » Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:58 pm

ivan/minivan has started the militant wing of the nhc!
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#55 Postby Hurricanehink » Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:00 pm

Possibly, they will have this part of the storm as Tropical Storm #14 or something like that. I think it should be Matthew, and Stormsfury, I back you 100%.
0 likes   

User avatar
greeng13
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 838
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 4:23 pm
Location: charleston, sc

#56 Postby greeng13 » Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:03 pm

it's already ivan though...unless they retract it and call it something else post-mortem
0 likes   

cybercyclone
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Portsmouth VA

#57 Postby cybercyclone » Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:05 pm

How strong was the Northern "Lobe"? HPC haf issued a 1002 MB low off the coast of ORF shortly after the initial re-emergence into the Atlantic, that at least seems to indicate that some sort of surface anomaly was what went south, though I am not a pro and could be wrong.
0 likes   

MW98GT
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 7:13 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

#58 Postby MW98GT » Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:09 pm

I use Hurrtrak and the plot does look funny. Hurrtrak thinks the storm is going 200 degrees at 4 mph. The track when it hit was around 20 degrees. It basically looks like it was spit back out.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#59 Postby Stormsfury » Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:33 pm

cybercyclone wrote:How strong was the Northern "Lobe"? HPC haf issued a 1002 MB low off the coast of ORF shortly after the initial re-emergence into the Atlantic, that at least seems to indicate that some sort of surface anomaly was what went south, though I am not a pro and could be wrong.


Maps that were posted back a few days ago by DT (WxRisk.Com) showed that that particular low pressure system developed in response to baroclinic effects and NOT a part of Ivan's SFC reflection ... that low was in response to the trough/baroclinicity of a different 500mb s/w ... very choatic looking actually ...

SF
0 likes   

DoctorHurricane2003

#60 Postby DoctorHurricane2003 » Wed Sep 22, 2004 7:36 pm

Did you ever email the NHC with your synopsis?...if so what was their response?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, cycloneye, gib, jgh, JtSmarts, ouragans, Steve, Steve H., Stratton23, zzzh and 78 guests